Government Bond Yields

Question A:

Deteriorating fiscal outlooks have contributed substantially to the recent rise in long-term government bond yields across advanced economies.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

A substantial portion of the increase in yields is caused by the increased supply of government bonds, even after controlling for inflation and sovereign default risk.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acharya
Viral Acharya
NYU Stern
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
It is coincident with other stretched Western economy government balance sheets also struggling to be rolled over, and also with private sector competition with IG debt being issued by AI hyper-scalers. Convenience yield at the long end is stably eroded since April 2025.
-see background information here
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Historically the relationship between fiscal outlook and bond returns is weak. It may have kicked in recently but it is hard to be sure.
-see background information here
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Face it, we don't really know. And which country? The france-germany spread is a default premium. The level of US rates, less clear. Measures of inflation or default premium are not that elevated. The crisis will come but not obviously right now.
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Du
Wenxin Du
HBS
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Eisfeldt
Andrea Eisfeldt
UCLA Anderson
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
A positive relationship between deficits and yields is consistent with fiscal theory.
Fama
Eugene Fama
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
I agree for some countries like France. I disagree for other many other countries such as U.S. and Germany.
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Hard to know how that has changed. what has changed is real investment demand from AI and inflation from higher oil prices. would look to those two as more likely to be important for the recent increases.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
One of several factors
Krishnamurthy
Arvind Krishnamurthy
Stanford GSB
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Its more about markets requiring higher yields to accept more supply than default risk per se. The significant effect is that rates on both public and private debt are up. A second effect is that the convenience yield on public debt is down, pushing up public more.
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Mester
Loretta Mester
UPenn Wharton
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Fiscal sustainability is a problem in many advanced economies including the US. There is no indication that there is a plan to dealing with the fiscal situation in the US. Growth and productivity is not enough to solve this issue.
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Muir
Tyler Muir
UCLA Anderson
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Feels right but I don’t see much support in the data except for France. I'd think fiscal channel should show up in inflation expectations, default risk, long yields rising more than short. Past year in the US: 2yr up more than 10yr, inflation breakevens flat, no action in US CDS
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Fiscal solvency concerns should show up in breakeven inflation or sovereign CDS spreads, which is mostly not happening (exception e.g. France).
Papanikolaou
Dimitris Papanikolaou
Northwestern Kellogg
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Markets have become more sensitive to fiscal conditions now that central banks are not absorbing a significant fraction of the new flow
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The statement is true for a few countries, with France being the leading example. But for most developed economies, the increase in interest rates has been an increase in real rates not inflation premia and hasnot been associated with increases in default risk as priced by CDS.
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Not uniformly across countries
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Hoover Institution Stanford
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Thesmar
David Thesmar
MIT Sloan
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
they have contributed (e.g. France), but this is only part of the story. US monetary policy expectations and money moving to equities & AI also explain a big part, potentially the bulk. for instance, german bonds are safe but yields have gone up.
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
At 100% debt/GDP, economy is vulnerable to negative shocks about future primary surpluses. The Iran war, low corp. tax revenues, and slowly increasing costs of entitlement programs have worsened the fiscal outlook.
-see background information here
Wallace
Nancy Wallace
Berkeley Haas
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Zhu
Haoxiang Zhu
MIT Sloan
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acharya
Viral Acharya
NYU Stern
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
I find in ongoing work with Michael Fleming, Toomas Laarits and Or Shachar that the supply shocks are aggravating the tilt of intermediaries away from long-term bonds to short-term Tbills, adding to the rate volatility
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Government bond supply is one factor, but so is private demand for loanable funds (driven in the US by the AI investment boom). The relative importance of these factors is unclear.
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Kind of mechanically, if one sector is borrowing a huge amount more, even if they have good plans to pay it off, interest rates rise.
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Du
Wenxin Du
HBS
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Eisfeldt
Andrea Eisfeldt
UCLA Anderson
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
It’s possible, and consistent with recent auction phenomena, but it is challenging to disentangle these effects.
Fama
Eugene Fama
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
The supply of government bonds is highly predictable. The surge in AI-related and data center bonds was unexpected. Nominal bond yields are up because expected real rates have increased due to higher expected economic growth.
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Krishnamurthy
Arvind Krishnamurthy
Stanford GSB
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Mester
Loretta Mester
UPenn Wharton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Government issuance will need to rise to fund Increased defense and safety net spending, and to cover interest expenses unless the fiscal situation is dealt with.
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Muir
Tyler Muir
UCLA Anderson
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Supply today: far more long-term Treasury debt, Fed no longer absorbing it, ECB and BoJ shrinking holdings. Supply risk ahead: potentially weaker promise of future QE so private investors bear more supply risk (Haddad, Moreira, Muir). Growth due to AI also likely important though
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Not clear, as we also have an AI-debt and AI-investment boom going on at the same time (that is expected to accelerate in the coming years).
Papanikolaou
Dimitris Papanikolaou
Northwestern Kellogg
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
The primary cause is the U.S. AI-driven investment boom,, then secondly, prospective deficits. Some countries like the U.S. have been reducing primary deficits and shortening the duration of their debt. But higher rates have raised deficits & increased supply, maybe substantially
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Expectations of future supply increases
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Hoover Institution Stanford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Thesmar
David Thesmar
MIT Sloan
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
yes, in conjunction with reduced demand to do AI bond issues + attraction of equities
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
The supply is large, but even more importantly, the buyer composition has changed with fewer foreign and central bank purchases. Price sensitive domestic buyers require higher yields.
-see background information here
Wallace
Nancy Wallace
Berkeley Haas
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Zhu
Haoxiang Zhu
MIT Sloan
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History