Populism and the Economy

Question A:

Economic insecurity is a more important driver of the recent rise of populist movements than voters’ concerns about national culture and identity.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Populist movements that achieve electoral success lead to a substantial slowdown in economic growth.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Some degree of potentially growth-constraining policies on trade, investment and/or migration is necessary to limit the further rise of populist movements in Europe.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
There are many reasons for populism and the importance of each varies by country. For many people, economic insecurity is key, while for others it is national culture/identity. I think the reluctance of centrist parties to take a long view and make hard choices is also key.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Populism is on the rise in all sorts of countries, whatever their level of development and economic success.
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
The role of economic insecurity in the rise of populist movements has been extensively documented by Cagé & Piketty (2023, 2025) in the case of the far-right RN in France and their main conclusions – based on careful empirical and historical analysis - apply to other contexts.
-see background information here
-see background information here
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
I think both factors are really important. Economic insecurity certainly also plays a major role.
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
I have a paper showing this band a recent boom “elements” published by CUP
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Economic uncertainty is not the only and probably not the foremost reason for people being discontent. The current rise of the extremes (in Germany on both sides of the spectrum) is a sign that many people want real change rather than coalitions that got essentially stuck.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Both factors are important (i.e., have empirical support or explanatory power), but it is difficult to rank them. They can even interact.
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
works linking adverse economic shocks, like the European crisis (Algan et al. 2018) and secular factors, like trade globalization (Autor et al. AER, Colantone and Stanig) on populist ideology and voting. But also empirical papers pinpointing the role of cultural factors.
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Both economics and culture clearly matter; their relative importance varies across voters. For an economic model in which populism arises as a rational voter response, see my 2021 Journal of Finance article with Pietro Veronesi.
-see background information here
-see background information here
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
First, the two complement each other. Second, no clear evidence in the literature of one being more important than the other.
-see background information here
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Even Scandinavia has a populist movement, even though the economic hardship and uncertainty is low compared to other countries. So economic conditions cannot be the main driver
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Right-wing populism is overrepresented in economically inferior groups. See Dal Bo et al (REStud
-see background information here
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Some do and some don't. It very much depends on the country and the particular programs implemented.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
milei as a potential exception?
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
But there is an element of tautology inasmuch as policies tend to be categorised as populist when they are ineffective or counterproductive albeit plausible.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
The statement is too bold/too easy to be true for all types of extremist populism. To some extent, populist movements have not much to do with the economy, and leave it more or less "free hand".
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
I definitely see conceptual arguments or reasons. There is some evidence but not yet strong empirical support.
-see background information here
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
clear-cut empirical evidence of the costs of populism: lower output growth, slight increase (or no movement at best) of inequality, plus significant adverse effects on institutions, which in turn affect long-run growth
-see background information here
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
See Guriev and Papaioannou
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
It is very hard to establish causality, but the best that the literature has been able to do supports the statement.
-see background information here
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
While one can find arguments to support this (political instability, cronyism, loss of trade, loss of workforce due to lower immigration, demographic pension deficits, etc) I am not aware of any empirical evidence.
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
I have seemed limited evidence on negative long run effects. Short run can go the other way round.

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
My view on this is similar to my first reply. In Europe the problem is that many governments seem unwilling to take a long view and go for easy short term measures. The reluctance by many governments to spend what is needed on defence is a good example.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
even if positive in the aggregate, some lose, who cannot be easily compensated, and we have to pay more attention to them, both on human and political grounds.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Yes, but we can't lump everything together! In particular, introducing fiscal, social, and environmental protectionism seems to be the most urgent task today (migration policy is a different matter). Moreover, such policies might not constrain growth.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
I still think that smart policies are possible. Also, policies should be better explained.
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
I disagree because I think what a successful anti-populist movement needs is a bold plan or idea that stimulates plans and visions for a better future. My preferred such vision is a democratically legitimized push for a stronger Europe - in defense, economics, financial markets
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
I see populist movements as considerable threat to democracy and so sacrificing some growth or accepting some economic loss to quell these movements makes sense. But we don't know which policies reliably work in limiting populism, or if suggested restrictions work, so uncertain.
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
There are other, growth-promoting policies that could do the job. See the Draghi or Letta reports.
-see background information here
-see background information here
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
It may be part of a the optimal bundle of policies, but it is not necessarily so. Also, following the first question, raising economic growth would reduce the populist appeal, so constraining growth goes in the wrong direction.
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Europe needs policies to increase growth and investments and reduce red tape and bureaucracy to combat populism. In addition the immigration policies that have been put in place lead to adverse selection and poor assimilation.
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
EU have already implemented such policies. Should do less rather than more at this point.
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Dealing with current issues with standard policies can do, if and when undertaken forcefully.