US

Defense Procurement

Question A:

Defense procurement that invites potential suppliers to propose technologies with potential military benefits rather than requiring them to meet tightly specified government requirements would generate substantially stronger military capabilities.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Defense procurement that enables start-up firms and other new entrants to participate (either as sole contractors or jointly with others, including incumbents) would generate substantially more innovation in military capabilities than directing spending predominantly towards incumbent contractors.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Strongly Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
A mix of the two is best. Sometimes clients know what they need and sometimes vendors have good ideas. With innovation casting a broad net is especially wise.
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
This idea makes sense. However, it is hard to combine it with a standard bidding process. Why will a company suggest an innovative product if the buyer can turn round and ask someone else to develop it? So it may be necessary to combine this with a partnership-type approach.
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Private suppliers and the military need to work together since military requirements often exceed civilian standards. The key problem is the slow response of government to new ideas proposed by private suppliers.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
This is miles away from my expertise, but based familiarity with other government contracting rules, this seems plausible.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Not sure about "substantially".
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Proposing technologies is not enough; the contract with the government would have to ensure those capabilities were used in weapons systems
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Seems like free disposal implies offering this option cannot make things worse, at least.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
The current system is focused on large and complex systems like aircraft carriers, beyond what a "start-up" can do. Start-ups can develop new technologies, like drones, that threaten those systems. We need to encourage them.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History