Defense Procurement

Question A:

Defense procurement that invites potential suppliers to propose technologies with potential military benefits rather than requiring them to meet tightly specified government requirements would generate substantially stronger military capabilities.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Defense procurement that enables start-up firms and other new entrants to participate (either as sole contractors or jointly with others, including incumbents) would generate substantially more innovation in military capabilities than directing spending predominantly towards incumbent contractors.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
The way that Ukraine has successfully innovated is a very interesting example for other countries. It seems there is continuous back and forth between the companies and the front line operatives using the technologies. It's not quite as the question poses the issue.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
It is ok to do it for some procurement but not for all of it.
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
The specifications may aim at interoperability, which is a major issue for defense procurement.
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
-There may be good reasons for tight specifications because any single weapon element needs to fit into a broader defense system. So consistency and fit and also uniform standards are absolutely key.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
This is a typical cost benefit analysis: encouraging innovation in new military technology needs to be balanced against the risk that they could have unwanted negative effects, hurt civilians, etc. It will depend on how well government procurement can assess these risks upfront.
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Red tape and cumbersome procurement rules makes it hard for small innovative companies to compete
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Likely but there are also clear downsides of comparing widely different proposals.
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
I think there is room for innovation by start-ups and this is very important. But there is also room for innovation by incumbents. It's true that drones have emerged as a potent and essential weapon. However, Patriot missiles developed by incumbents are also essential.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Unsure what prevents smaller firms to compete. As a matter of facts, there are huge economies of scale in this area. Need to combine innovation (smaller firms) with scale (consolidation).
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
The process of identifying alternative weapon systems, like proof of concept etc., could and should be separated strictly from the mass-product procurement process itself. So again, here, a high degree of standardization in the procurement process makes sense
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
In principle, procurement is open to start-ups or new entrants, but there are many practical challenges to (successful) participation in def procurement. Thus, in practice, participation can be quite limited. Broader participation, more ideas, more innovation.
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
it depends on how well managed the procurement process is, and firm capabilities need to be carefully assessed upfront. More competition in the supply chain is good if these suppliers are competent/correctly incentivized. There is a long literature in org econ on the pitfalls!
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History