US

Pied-a-Terre Tax

Question A:

The New York governor has proposed a pied-à-terre tax to support the New York City mayor’s efforts to close the city’s budget gap: https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-hochul-announces-pied-terre-tax-proposal-luxury-second-homes-valued-5-million-or-more

Details are starting to emerge: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/17/nyregion/second-home-tax.html

In the meantime, consider a tax that starts at 0.5% of assessed value over $5 million and rises to 4% of assessed value over $25 million, as in this 2019 proposal: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/S44/amendment/original

An annual property tax surcharge on second homes in New York City valued at $5 million or more would raise annual revenues of at least $500 million for the city over the next five years.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

An annual property tax surcharge on second homes in New York City valued at $5 million or more would lead to a substantial exodus of businesses and high-net-worth individuals from the city over the next five years.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

An annual property tax surcharge on second homes in New York City valued at $5 million or more would make housing substantially more affordable for ordinary New Yorkers over the next five years.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Seems unlikely given the transition matrix implied by the Vancouver experiment. But there is a mansion transfer tax on induced sales so the total short run revenue effect is potentially in the ballpark.
-see background information here
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
I can find enough on what elasticity range would make this true.
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Many will find ways to avoid paying the tax - e.g., by renting out their properties. And there are also many questions regarding the valuation of the apartments.
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Far from a sure thing but it seems plausible
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
This depends on the empirical elasticities of migration and home buying that NO ONE in the economics panel knows. So, anyone who purports to give a definitive answer is just guessing without data. We are not supposed, as good economists, to guess without evidence.
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Some owners will undoubtedly leave. London has seen an exodus after raising taxes on this high wealth group. Uncertain how many will be left to pay the tax. And valuations will go down.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
I expect litigation to slow this down and then implementation will take time. So even without any behavioral responses I expect it to harder to raise any revenue than is being promised.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Many properties are valued below market.
-see background information here
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
I suspect that the 500 million figure as calculated by proponents of the tax on the assumption that there will be no behavioral response, whereas I expect a behavioral response that will diminish the tax revenue.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Not an expert on revenue estimation.
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
People with expensive unoccupied homes in Manhattan are wealthy and likely have inelastic demand.
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Litigation, sales, and restructured ownership will reduce tax revenue.
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
It should be straightforward to compute an upper bound, but I do not have the detailed information for that. Unknown elasticities make the effect lower, but there is a lot of uncertainty on that.

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
A "substantial" exodus in response to such a modest tax would require a huge elasticity of mobility, which is unlikely to apply given the amenities and services that the very rich enjoy in New York City.
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
The tax induces a little in-migration of permanent residents and these properties will not remain vacant. "Substantial" depression of business activity seems unlikely.
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
There are few individuals affected to start with, and most of those affected would not pay much or would find ways to avoid taxation. But if someone like Ken Griffin leaves the city, this could have significant consequences for the finances of NYC.
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
See my previous response. Do not guess without evidence, my fellow economists.
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
NYC efftective property tax rates are about 1%. Any of the surtax proposals would make the marginal effective property tax rates for high value property very high by US standards, and create a large competitive disadvantage for NYC property.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
It will lead to a reduction. The question is how substantial. But, I will vote for substantial assuming it coincides with a deterioration in other services in NYC.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Disclosure: Ken Griffin was an early supporter of the Clark Center. I have not spoken to him about this. It depends on how this is might be implemented. If Citadel alone pulled the plug on its new project on Park Avenue that would be substantial. Be careful what you wish for!
-see background information here
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Only income taxes have been shown to have much impact.
-see background information here
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
I do not expect residents to respond substantially to a tax on second homes.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Massachusetts' millionaires' tax hasn't done so, and New York has more magnetism. But who knows.
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
If a wealthy person chooses to sell their expensive apartment to a wealthy resident, that is likely to generate more economic activity for the city than the visitor does
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
It's second homes, so probably more responsive to property tax changes. But not enough to amount to a substantial impact.
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
This is a possibility, but I see it as remote now. The direct effect is likely low. But there is a risk if starts to signal higher progressively in other ways that may lead to more significant migration decisions.

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
I don't see how a tax can make housing more affordable. If the argument is that people would leave their secondary homes in response to the tax and this would increase the supply of housing for low-income or middle-income households, then it seems a very strange argument.
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
On net, given how inelastic supply is, we don't expect this to stymie construction much. The tax should have price effects, but something substantial for typical NYers is unlikely.
-see background information here
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
The tax is totally irrelevant for the question of affordability.
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
This is obvious. The amount of space to which this would apply is trivial, so that the effect on the supply of housing would be trivial. This could not possibly affect the price per sq ft of housing for people with modest incomes.
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
The increase in property tax rates would cause substantial reductions in the market value of the affected properties. This would not help many people. Being a Stanford home owner, I know that the increase in property taxes is capitalized into the home prices.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Will make it more affordable for rich New Yorkers. Unlikley to help the median New Yorkers. In fact, might hurt as the city gets less vibrant and there are fewer jobs. Again, see London and the UK.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
This is not going to change building supply anytime soon. See Rollet's job market paper for all the impediments.
-see background information here
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Strongly Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
"Affordability" typically refers to prices and rentals below the luxury housing market; I expect limited trickle-down.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
No reason to expect this.
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
The policy either generates revenue OR expands the supply of housing, in which case prices must fall. But the effect will be small, not "substantial".
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
No, quantitatively that is clearly impossible. I see way the spillovers from this small slice of land and building can affect the much greater issue of relative housing scarcity.