European Capital Markets

Question A:

Creating a ‘28th regime’ - an optional, EU-wide code of corporate, securities and insolvency law that firms could adopt and which would pre-empt the application of any of the 27 national rulebooks - would be substantially more effective in building a European capital market than continuing efforts to achieve harmonisation of the national rulebooks.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Creating the 28th regime would substantially increase the supply of capital to new ventures and growing businesses.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

A well-functioning and efficient single EU capital market requires a strengthened European Securities and Markets Authority, comparable to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, to operate as a single market regulator.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
It's not clear how widely used such a 28th regime would be used. Even if it was, it would probably take many years to lead to a significant change in the way capital markets in the EU work. There is already an EU company law setting minimum standards that has had little effect.
-see background information here
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
i see no reason not to try to do both
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
For an efficient capital market union you would need a high uptake. The European society legal framework is not encouraging. Also, wide perimeter quite challenging. But perhaps limiting the 28th regime to bankruptcy procedures could work.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
An optional regime would avoid many political-economy roadblocks. National supervisors would keep control of domestic offers; banks could still sell their own products. Harmonization does not harmonize- countries "gold-plate" the ruels to protect their own champions
-see background information here
-see background information here
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
More promising than harmonization, but still unclear how successful 28th regime would be.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Building a harmonized regime is not working, so we can forget that. Building a new regime, a 28th one, is an option, but it is not the only one. An equivalent, though much cheaper solution would be to let firms choose among existing (27) regimes. Luxembourg as EU Delaware?
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Time is now of the essence. There is considerable evidence that EU harmonization of rules is slow and not very effective. EU harmonization with national implementation can even increase differences across EU markets (see link below).
-see background information here
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Sure, but agreeing on the 28th regime could be very difficult and might produce a monster.

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Again this is very uncertain. So far the CMU has made very limited progress.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
"substantially" feels too strong.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
By allowing the rapid scaling up of business it would increase the value of the opportunities and hence the amount of capital markets would want to allocate
-see background information here
-see background information here
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Not clear that the lack of a single legal regime is the main barrier.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Given my answer to the previous question, this one is a no-brainer...
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Reducing regulatory obstacles and differences in rules via 28th regime should increase supply of capital to public and private firms.
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Iincrease, yes, but "substantially"?

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
I think strengthening ESMA would help. The SEC operates in an environment with many different state laws. An enhanced ESMA could change things substantially in the way SEC did when it was founded.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
ESMA is the wrong institution to pick for a European SEC. It is set up as a democratic, college-like regulator rather than a technical supervisory team, but rather representatives of their respective. governments. We desperately need an. independent and competent authority.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
National regulatory agencies differ in capabilities, funding, etc. So even if there was a single EU rule book or 28th regime, without a single market regulator, there would be divergence and patchwork in implementation and enforcement.
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History