US

AI, Work, and Education

Question A:

Use of artificial intelligence over the next ten years will lead to a substantial increase in the unemployment rates in advanced countries.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Use of artificial intelligence over the next ten years will have a negative impact on the earnings potential of substantial numbers of high-skilled workers in advanced countries.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Use of artificial intelligence over the next ten years will lead to substantially greater uncertainty about the likely returns to investment in education.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
I interpret use of AI to refer to current AI design and deployment practices. Fundamentally, such effects depend on choices made by AI companies (and businesses). There is a pro-worker AI path that would not lead to such unemployment effects, but that's not what is pursued.
-see background information here
-see background information here
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
It is too early to know. Past technological innovations have not. But this time could be different.
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
There will be substantial dislocation but I think people will find other jobs when AI is a substitute for what they are doing and in other cases it will be a complement.
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
I am more confident that inequality will rise (wages fall in the lower end) than unemployment rising.
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Historically, labor displacing technologies sho up as declines in participation rates not an increase in unemployment rates.
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
There will be serious impacts of AI on the labor force but the impact on unemployment will depend on the sector and country. Many workers will suffer substantial wage loss. Older workers may retire earlier than planned. Unemployment is not indicative of long-run impacts.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Expect increased productivity to lead to more employment over time. There may be short-term volatility.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
low conviction, but it does not seem to be happening and there are forces that can go in both directions.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Many jobs will surely be lost, but we don’t know yet how many new ones will be created.
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
AI will eliminate many types of jobs, but will likely open up many new ones, just as with previous technological innovations.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
As technology and the China shocks previously, AI will change the relative demand for workers with different skills. Countries with more rigid wages would face increased unemployment while other countries should experience wage stagnation and losses.
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Could be a lot of underemployment.
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Seems more likely that there would be a decline in the labor force participation rate as workers made obsolete drop out of the formal labor market, but who knows...
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
I would expect certain occupations to be substantially negatively affected, but countervailing influences and adoption frictions will expectedly mitigate negative overall effects.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Previous forms of automation have not lead to high aggregate unemployment. This technology may, however, be different, so it is uncertain. Unemployment is more likely when displacement is coupled with high unemployment insurance benefits.

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
There are many claims that AI will impact high-skill workers. The evidence outside of coding is scant. AI will displace customer service and many other service workers. If displaced, high-skill workers may be able to adapt better to AI and take jobs away from low-skill workers.
-see background information here
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Agree but tricky to tell WHICH workers.
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
New jibs will be created. But some high educated workers may end up moving down the job ladder if there job is displaced.
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Many administrative jobs will be eliminated. Reimbursements at Stanford is increasingly burdensome. Bureaucrats slow the process with silly questions that have easy answers. AI bureaucrats may ask the same questions but they will be faster .... and cheaper!
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
High-skilled professionals whose work is repetitive---e.g., radiologists---may be oarticularly affected
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
AI will decrease the earnings potential of a substantial number of jobs, but will open up earning potential in other types of jobs.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Use of artificial intelligence over the next ten years will have a negative impact on some high-skilled workers and a positive impact on others.
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Could happen in theory, but the early empirical work (and to be fair it is very early) is not showing any sign of this.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
A real possibility reasonable guess give its trend and general purpose nature and basic supply vs demand logic (it proxy well for an increase in supply of high skill labor), but HIGH UNCERTAINTY remains —> low confidence on my "guesstimate" (can it push demand out too?).

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
This is true even if AI does not affect high-skill workers adversely. AI is creating huge uncertainty about the labor market and jobs, and this will impact education. AI in classrooms is also impacting human cognition and creating uncertainty about how student learning.
-see background information here
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Agree esp if we are talking about very specific types of education such as law school as opposed to more general purpose education.
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
For 50 years I told students that math and CS courses will give you an advantage no matter what field you end up in. The big change is computers are becoming (as I predicted in my book in 1998) as smart as people. Being smarter than other people used to be enough. Not any more.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
We will still need people to tell the AI what to do.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
whether it is objectively true that the uncertainty is higher, the perception is likely to be such.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
We will find out when studies like this one are updated.
-see background information here
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
At this point, AI creates a great deal of uncertainty, in many areas, and is likely to continue to do so.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
In many sectors affected by AI one sees a drop in the demand for workers entering the labor force.
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Could go either way!
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Possible since other skills may become relatively more scarce. Best guess, but high UNCERTAINTY —> low confidence in guesstimate.