Emissions Regulation

Question A:

US regulation of greenhouse gases – including carbon dioxide from motor vehicles and power plants, and methane from oil and gas wells – rests on the Clean Air Act. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently announced its rescission of the greenhouse gas endangerment finding and motor vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards: https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/final-rule-rescission-greenhouse-gas-endangerment. The President of the National Academy of Sciences subsequently wrote to the organization's members, noting that 'the EPA justified its decision on legal, economic, and regulatory opinions, and not on the science’.

The weight of economic analysis and evidence supports the conclusion that some form of regulation of greenhouse gas emissions is warranted.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

For US consumers and firms, the health and environmental benefits of greenhouse gas emission standards outweigh the costs, making the EPA rescission substantially net negative for American society.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Since the environmental costs of greenhouse gas emissions are globally distributed, some form of collective international regulation is warranted.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
There is very strong scientific evidence that greenhouse gases are damaging to the climate.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
There is a lot of empirical evidence in the existing literature documenting a large impact of the Clean Air Act on several important outcomes. I am just providing a very few examples (much more are provided e.g. in the literature review by Aldy et al 2022).
-see background information here
-see background information here
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Fighting climate change is an almost classical case of public goods provision. Provided, of course, you believe what scientists form several disciplines have been saying for a long time: climate change is at least partly man-made, and can thus be slowed down by policy action.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
I interpreted regulation broadly to include taxation on emissions.
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Climate change is already having disruptive effects on the US climate. It is difficult to get insurance as a result of these changes in many places. These effects will get worse over time without action.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
the nature of the game is that not playing, and absent retaliation, may make you better off
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
In principle there is a collective action problem. But in practice, a majority of countries in the world are now involved in the green transition and are developing green technologies. The United States could miss this revolution (on top of being a free rider).
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
I do agree with this statement even if I think that it is not well framed. It is indeed hard to think about relevant metrics that would allow to compare the health and environmental benefits (e.g. in terms of life; I don’t think it makes sense to give a monetary price to life).
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
US is sufficiently large to affect global outcomes.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Setting and enforcing emission standards is one way to achieve the internalization of greenhouse gas externalities. SInce the recission of emission policy is not substituting other ways of emission internaliztion, the net effect is necessarily negative.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
For firms, abatement is costly, but large benefits to consumers &society. Estimates for global social cost of carbon (=benefits of abatemnt) $200-250, which often exceeds abatemnt costs. But US SCC is much lower, so case rests on US abatemt leading to abatemt by other OECD ctrys
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Global action is warranted because of the global nature of the problem.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Though good luck getting that through.
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
International coordination is best. A lot can however be done at the level of a large country like the US or a continent like Europe
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
International competition is one reason why collective greenhouse gas policy is so difficult to achieve. International agreements can help to avoid predatory emission policies.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History