Defense Spending

Question A:

A substantial increase in defense spending largely funded by government borrowing would deliver a measurable boost to economic growth over the next five years.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Increasing public investment in defense R&D would generate substantial technological spillovers and productivity gains in addition to the boost to national military capabilities.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

The market power of defense suppliers substantially raises procurement costs without adding to military capabilities.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
This is a difficult issue with a great deal uncertainty. However, it seems that defence spending needs to focus to considerable degree on innovation and this may lead to direct growth and spill over effects.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
probably, but, if indeed debt financed, through the fiscal boost to demand. The supply side effects can go either way, crowding out investment more directly useful to growth
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
In some countries, there is a risk of increasing spreads, given current fiscal situation.
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Especially if the borrowing is collective across the EU
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Defense spending will be, at least in part, a net addition to public investment.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
More plausible in the short-run but over 5 years the effect it is uncertain and depends on a variety of factors such as monetary policy, spare capacity, how much is imported or spent domestically, and the composition of defense spending (e.g., how much R&D).
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
ample micro and macro evidence on the positive working via innovation effects of large military spending, like WWII (DARPA), on growth (besides positive short-run multiplier effects). See among other Antolin-Diaz and Surico (AER), Surico, Martinez, Gazzani and Natoli)
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Depends on the composition of that spending. But, given recent proposals and the track record outside of armed conflict, I am pessimistic.
-see background information here
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
However, if the increase in domestic spending translates into purchases to foreign defense suppliers, it will not do much to boost domestic economic growth.
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Ultimately defence spending has to be met with tax increases
-see background information here
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
unclear how much extra capacity exists that could be activated; debt levels are very high across Europe already
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Yes, I think there is a fair chance this will happen. The way of fighting wars is changing significantly given what is happening in Ukraine and Iran. Innovation is critical factor so there may be significant spill over effects.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
"substantial" is too strong (remember the remark that teflon was one of the main effects of NASA on the economy). More directly targeted investment would do more.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Depends on market structure, procurement process, etc.
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
The answer to this question depends on whether or not the defense items purchased are being newly developed, e.g. in Europe, or off-shelf from, e.g., the US.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Recent evidence supports the statement, indicating that defense R&D crowds in private R&D and produces technological and productivity spillovers, but returns depend on program design and technology diffusion
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
It can, under the right circumstances, which is not quite close to enough to the "would" in the question.
-see background information here
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Much empirical evidence that defence R&D can boost productivity growth and crowd in private innovation if crafted wisely.
-see background information here
-see background information here
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Depends on the counterfactual. E.g. compare public funding of scientific research.
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
doubtful; Europe especially has not shown great talent for this
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
The risk is that public investment is invested into laggard national champions.

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
It's a very difficult issue whether monopoly or competition leads to more innovation. I think this issue is uncertain. It depends very much on the particular situation.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Provided that market power exists. I admit total ignorance about the market power of that sector.
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
not just monopoly power, but straight lobbying.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
In defense markets, political considertions typically play a big role, reducing competition from alternative suppliers.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Supplier concentration weakens competition and can create inefficient contracting, but evidence is mixed. See two studies below illustrating that evidence/answer is uncertain.
-see background information here
-see background information here
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
This is an important point but depends on the execution and governance of the defense spending and investments.
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Defence procurement highly concentrated in primes which leads to higher prices, worse quality and lack of innovation (this has got worse in US over last 30 years)
-see background information here
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
What else is new?