Clark Center Forum

About the Clark Center Forum

The Forum for the Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets is home to the European, Finance, and US Economic Experts Panels as well as a repository of thoughtful, current, and reliable information regarding topics of the day.
On Global Markets

Digital Markets

Digital markets present policymakers with a quandary. This arises partially from the fact that, in the grand scheme of things, they remain a relatively recent phenomenon, and so, unlike many other markets, decades of data and evidence on how they typically develop and operate are still lacking.  The contours of the debate were neatly set […] 
On Global Markets

America’s Loss, Europe’s Gain?

American science may be under threat. Last week, the Financial Times looked at the potential impacts of the Trump administration’s cuts to science funding. As the FT reported: Last month, almost 2,000 researchers including dozens of Nobel Prize winners issued an open letter raising the alarm. “We see real danger in this moment,” said the […] 
US

Digital Market Regulation

This US survey examines (a) The current antitrust laws and regulations in the United States are inadequate for preventing digital platform firms from engaging in acquisitions and exclusionary conduct that harm competition; (b) Background on the Digital Markets Act: https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/index_en; Digital markets would work better if, in a manner broadly similar to the European Union’s Digital Markets Act*, criteria were established to designate some large firms as 'gatekeepers' and a regulatory body was established to govern the business practices of those gatekeepers 
On Global Markets

Foreign Aid Cuts

In 1970, more than half a century ago, the United Nations General Assembly passed resolution 2626 committing economically advanced countries to spending 0.7% of their gross national income (GDI) to official development assistance (ODA) by 1975.  Few countries ever actually met that target. And this year both the United States and the United Kingdom have […] 
Europe

Foreign Aid

This European survey examines (a) The reductions in Western programs of development assistance will have no measurable effects on GDP growth in the recipient countries over the next five years; (b) The reductions in Western programs of development assistance will have substantially negative effects on the most vulnerable people in the recipient countries over the next five years; (c) Development assistance motivated by the potential benefits for the donors in terms of prosperity and security is measurably more effective in promoting GDP growth in recipient countries than aid based on humanitarian or other moral principles 
US

Foreign Aid

This US survey examines (a) The cancellation of the majority of programs run by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) will have no measurable effects on GDP growth in the recipient countries over the next five years; (b) The cancellation of the majority of USAID programs will have substantially negative effects on the most vulnerable people in the recipient countries over the next five years; (c) Development assistance motivated by the potential benefits for the donors in terms of prosperity and security is measurably more effective in promoting GDP growth in recipient countries than aid based on humanitarian or other moral principles