Tech Sovereignty

Question A:

The European Commission recently presented the European Technological Sovereignty Package, a set of measures intended to strengthen Europe's capacity in semiconductors, artificial intelligence (AI), cloud and open source: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_1187

EU countries' current reliance on non-European digital infrastructure – including cloud computing, AI, microchips, software and data centres – carries substantial economic risks in the medium term.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

By securing critical supply chains (such as advanced semiconductors), scaling local cloud data centres and funding open source alternatives, the EU's technological sovereignty package will substantially reduce economic risks in the medium term.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

By securing critical supply chains (such as advanced semiconductors), scaling local cloud data centres and funding open source alternatives, the EU's technological sovereignty package will substantially increase the long-term productivity and innovation capacity of European tech firms.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Given the current geopolitical situation, it is very important Europe has its capabilities in these areas.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Strongly Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
In the age of geopolitical (and geo-economic) rivalry, the dependency on several basic technological inputs creates a classical hold-up situation that not only limits Europe's value added services, but also creates choke points that restrict international policy options.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Strongly Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Risk that tech supply chains will be used for geopolitical leverage is high in medium term. Obvious challenge is to replace them but Europe needs to try.
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
We can buy all that pretty cheaply from the leading producers.

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
This is a very important issue that we need to take action on.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
It may be VERY expensive to do so, so this will entail its own economic risks.
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Clearly dependent on the how !
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
It is a step in the right direction, but a lot will depend on the scale and the implementation.
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Absolutely, by establishing redundancy in supply chains and digital infrastructure, Europe's room to move in the direction it wants is significantly enlarged.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Substantial is a high bar and, as always, implementation and execution are key for actual outcomes (rather than intended ones).
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Strongly Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
I hope it will
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
as usual, the underlying *reasons* for extreme weakness in AI are barely addressed; my guess - it will end like the Lisbon Agenda, a vainglorious soundbite for the Eurocratic bubble
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Why do we need the Commission for that? First order of business should be eliminate the reasons why Europe is lagging.

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
This seems more tenuous to me. Europe needs to think carefully as to why it is not very innovative compared to the US and China. We need to understand why they are so much more successful in this and what Europe can do to improve.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
The gains would be in security, not productivity
Auriol
Emmanuelle Auriol
Toulouse School of Economics
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Likely to be some cost in developing our own products. So, on net, may decrease expected growth rate, but increase resilience.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Cagé
Julia Cagé
Sciences Po
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
but again lots of pitfalls!
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Fatás
Antonio Fatás
INSEAD
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
An increased independence of Europe's digital infrastructure and supply chains is good for geoeconomics, but not necessarily for productivity and innovation.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Yes, if the package jump starts technological development and creates competition. But it is also easy to see how this package could provide subsidies for (less productive) European companies or could shield them from competition and hence have the opposite effect.
Manova
Kalina Manova
University College London
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Papaioannou
Elias Papaioannou
London Business School
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Not sure that the effect will be "substantial"
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
The advantage of technological independence is mainly to reduce geopolitical risk. Expected growth is probably maximized by relying on US technology
Strömberg
Per Strömberg
Stockholm School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
It will cost money and achieve little; one more example showing that Stalin is alive and well and working in Brussels
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
All of these things are highly desirable, of course. But, again, why isn't it not happening? The Draghi Report includes a huge list of barriers to dismantle, but vested interests make sure that it's not happening. This sounds like the infamous Lisbon Treaty.