Stablecoin Adoption

Question A:

The markets for consumer and business payment services would be substantially more efficient if payments by stablecoins (privately issued digital tokens pegged to a fiat currency) became an accepted alternative to traditional payments.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Ten years from now, stablecoins will account for a substantial share of payment flows and deposits in the global banking system.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Stablecoins do not have inherent advantages over other digital technologies for payments settlement.
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Uncertain. Stable coin is not technologically simpler than central ledger. It seems to offer regulatory work around, for example creating effectively narrow banks and payments oriented money market funds that the Fed and other regulators will now not allow with conventional tech.
Cornelli
Francesca Cornelli
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Du
Wenxin Du
HBS
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
If stablecoins become widely accepted (which is not all that likely), the added competition for banks would increase efficiency. Bank-railed payment services would improve and interchange fees for credit cards would decline significantly.
Eberly
Janice Eberly
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fama
Eugene Fama
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Depends on the method of exchange, not just the medium of exchange.
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Efficiency: 1) Near instant transfers anywhere in world on Layer 2s; 2) miniscule fees (no swipe fee); 3) secure (100% collateralized with safe assets under GENIUS); 4) much needed backup system (does not use banking system, offers an alternative if problems w/ banking system).
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
I don't see the use case for the US, other than perhaps cross-border payments. FedNOW can solve most of this. This is still mostly about crypto to crypto transactions
Koijen
Ralph Koijen
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Strongly Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Lo
Andrew Lo
MIT Sloan Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Big difference between domestic and international payments. Also might be more efficient than current system (very inefficient) but a lot less than a modern publicly provided payment infrastructure (combo of digital currency and modern payment system)
Matvos
Gregor Matvos
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
We have no idea at this point.
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
In some countries yes, but not clear it will be true in others where the payment system is already quite efficient (assuming that rules concerning KYC and AML still apply to stablecoin transactions, too).
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
There are extremely well-developed payments rails using traditional ledgers and currencies. Stablecoins have no technological advantage, and blockchain based coins are less efficient. They have only a regulatory advantage. MMMFs regulated like stablecoins would be more efficient.
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Hoover Institution Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
stable coins may be subject to runs
-see background information here
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
The future of payments technology is extremely uncertain, and depends on political factors as well as economic considerations.
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Again, much is regulatory arbitrage not better technology. Currently stable coin regulation does not allow the payment of interest. If rates rise at all, electronic money will have to pay. Privacy vs. law enforcement the other big unknown.
Cornelli
Francesca Cornelli
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Du
Wenxin Du
HBS
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Stablecoins could account for a large share of remittances and business payments to and from emerging markets. Most other payments will probably still be made with bank deposits. There is a lot of uncertainty around these outcomes.
Eberly
Janice Eberly
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fama
Eugene Fama
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
But users should get yield. Tether had double the profit of BLK last year. Tether per employee profit was $85m. We will see alternatives to stablecoins such as tokenized bonds that pay yield. Also, I expect governments to issue stablecoins (why not? they are technically not CBDC)
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Could be the case that in countries with unstable economies, stable coins could make it easier to "dollarize".
Koijen
Ralph Koijen
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Lo
Andrew Lo
MIT Sloan Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Much will depend on whether public institutions will step up to provide a basic infrastructure that will obviate the need for stable coins,
Matvos
Gregor Matvos
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
In parts of the world, this will likely be an attractive means of payment relative to other options.
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
There is a huge amount of regulatory uncertainty over the treatment of traditional financial institutions like regulated stablecoins, and a huge amount of legal uncertainty over how they will be allowed to evolve.
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Hoover Institution Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
The pace of technology (e.g., quantum) and the inherent challenges seem hard to predict.
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
this is a distinct possibility, but will require a legal framework and substantial coordination, as well as adoption throughout the financial sector.
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History