Energy and Emissions in Developing Countries

Question A:

The OECD’s projected cumulative emissions of greenhouse gases from today until the year 2100 is 616.2 billion metric tons of CO2e, compared to 2,734 billion metric tons for the rest of the world - 82% of the total. (Larsen et al, Rhodium Group, 2024: https://climateoutlook.rhg.com/reports/rhodium-climate-outlook-2024-probabilistic-global-emissions-and-energy-projections)

The domestic net benefits of emissions reductions vary substantially across countries because of differences in income levels and exposure to climate risk.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

In the absence of incentives from developed countries, developing countries will not reduce their emissions substantially in places where the private costs of fossil fuels remain meaningfully lower than those of zero-carbon fuels.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Providing incentives for developing countries to reduce their emissions through penalties (such as a carbon border adjustment mechanism or carbon club) is substantially less effective than providing equivalent incentives through subsidies (such as payments for climate damages in exchange for emissions reductions).

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Exposure to climate risk, in particular, seems crucial in determining net benefits of reducing emissions. For islands currently just above sea level, the risk is existential, while for others it may be much less.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Also depending on the starting point (energy mix, share of industry in the economy)
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
But are significant for nearly all.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
"Net benefit" is difficult to define, whereas "perceived benefit" (by the respective population) is likely to be dependent on the level of development - and on the moral-political stance: climate deniers are significant in numbers in some countries.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
While I agree, there is still considerable uncertainly how much individual countries will be affected by climate change (who may get of lightly and who will suffer the most)
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
It depends on the net benefits and the politics of the country. Some may still reduce.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Removing subsidies to fossil fuels would already reduce the price gap. This would save public money that can be redirected to the transition.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Subsidies might help. But China and India might join collective action given that those large nations internalise part of the climate change costs they are generating.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
In this case, there are strong (private) incentives to use fossil fuels. But some developing countries will nevertheless install policies to reduce their emissions and to counter these incentives. Magnitude of this effect or the net effect are unclear.
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Low-income countries naturally prioritize reducing the poverty of their own citizens today over improving the well-being of global citizens decades from now.
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
True if fossil fuels remain cheaper BUT transfers can be replaced by local carbon taxes.

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Subsidies would be better but there are significant problems with these such as who pays, corruption, and so forth. An alternative is to incentivize multinationals to help in this process (see Journal of International Business Studies article with URL below).
-see background information here
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Could be so in theory but in practice the governance of carbon credits is problematic.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
I agree but would argue that it is best to combine the two tools, i.e., a CBAM with subsidies to compensate the cost for developing economies
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
I don't think we have good evidence about weather carrots or sticks will work better. My prior is that it depends on the exact instruments and on their level. Given the political economy constraints on cash from developing countries, solutions like CBAM seem ideal to me.
-see background information here
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Prices matter.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Carbon club is more likely to produce consistent policies across the world, whereas a variety of incentive schemes may only lead to arbitrage.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Q is ill-posed. If incentives are set to be equivalent then reduction should be the same. But costs of providing incentives & ensuring compliance can vastly differ. Subsidies tend to be expensive. Behavioral effects of sticks vs carrots are different in practice. So uncertain
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Better yet to subsidize innovation that will make renewables and their storage cheaper than fossil fuels.
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Not sure I’d characterize CBAM as a “penalty”.
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
The case for transfers is driven by valid moral considerations. From and exclusive economic viewpoint, transfers are likely to be inefficient.