US

Digital Privacy and Digital Harm

Question A:

The potential for consumers to be harmed by digital platforms’ use of their personal data is sufficient that they would benefit from laws assigning them some kind of default control rights over their data.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

The risks of harm from use of social media services - such as harm to mental health, exploitation of children, and more - are now high enough that society would benefit from federal regulations setting safety standards and creating a process of compensation for harm by digital platforms.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
It may be difficult to make this work, but the current configuration is deeply problematic, subject to abuse, and seemingly getting worse in real time (witness Meta's recent sleazy behavior).
-see background information here
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Agree though implementation is challenging.
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Consumers currently trade their data for use of services. A mere default allows consumers to continue to make this trade.
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
If control is sufficiently important to platforms they can always buy it back from consumers
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Key to do it selectively, weighing private vs social benefits and also what can be effectively anonymized.
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
We already have some protection. Other than enforcing existing laws, it is unclear what else is possible. Current AI tools are able to learn much from an individual's ordinary internet activity. See work of Michal Kosinski at Stanford GSB.
-see background information here
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Some rights might be ok, but laws often can be harmful like the GDPR rule in Europe that destroys immense value.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Need to realize that GDPR had many unintended consequences, so care is needed.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
The details of such a law would matter a lot.
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Specially the right to be informed and the right to rectification at no-cost.
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
It is hard to see this being a bad thing, but creating a regime that actually benefits consumers would not be at all simple.
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
I agree with this in theory, but in practice, GDPR in the EU seems to just produce sludge. If you reject the default cookies you often get sent down a rabbit hole. One click opt out would be good, or a phone setting even better.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
When's the last time you read the "terms and conditions" when you installed software?
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Privacy its breaches are an important issue (and do involve some externalities, e.g. if I provide my friends on a social network) and competitive issues (price discrimination). Less obvious though what the right solution is that does not introduce too much friction in the market.
-see background information here

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
We now have clear evidence that Instagram in particular harms the well-being of young women.
-see background information here
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Some safety standards seem appropriate but liability structures that create more platform liability for user generated content have important costs and benefits.
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
I'm highly uncertain how to do this without significant adverse consequences. So far, GDPR regulation in the EU has not gone very well.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
The harm is substantial beginning with addiction and effects on attention spans. Regulation and increased liability would be good steps forward.
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
I think the answer depends on the form of the "safety standards" and the "process of compensation for harm"
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
This will give them better incentives than now to monitor what is on their platforms
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Is there beneficial regulation consistent with our freedoms? AI is often doing analysis that people do themselves. The difference is that AI can analyze and remember larger amounts of data. How can we control AI without controlling normal human interactions?
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
This is not an easy problem to solve. Mandating a legal solution will reduce innovation and move toward European-type solutios that do not work.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
The evidence of the dangers of social media is now compelling enough to prompt action.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Well-designed regulations and a capable agency could benefit consumers, but there are many ways for regulation to go wrong.
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Like the previous question it is hard to answer this in the abstract. yes, there are probably some regs that would have benefits>costs but how to know in advance that this will be true.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Creating the regulations will be hard, and there is not a lot of convincing evidence on some of the potential harms, but there are some that are serious, well-documented and with unclear legal frameworks.
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
A market full of externalities via social interactions and evidence of negative effects justifies some thoughtful regulation, especially for non adults to help parents.
-see background information here