US

Experimental Research, Development Economics and Poverty Reduction

View European results for this poll Add to Poll

Question A:

Randomized control trials are a valuable tool for answering some long unsettled questions in development economics research.

Responses

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology

Question B:

Randomized control trials are a valuable tool for making significant progress in poverty reduction.

Responses

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology
Download Poll Data

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu 		MIT
Agree
6
 Bio/Vote History
RCTs like all other tools are of course useful. Each has limitations. For RCTs challenges are scalability, GE and political economy effects.
-see background information here
Alesina
Alberto Alesina 		Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji 		Yale
Strongly Agree
9
 Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach 		Berkeley
Strongly Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor 		MIT
Strongly Agree
10
 Bio/Vote History
Baicker
Katherine Baicker 		University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
3
 Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee 		MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand 		Chicago
Strongly Agree
5
 Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier 		Princeton
Agree
5
 Bio/Vote History
It should be one tool out of many useful tools. E.g. China’s large poverty reduction was mostly due to industrial policy.
Chetty
Raj Chetty 		Harvard
Strongly Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier 		Yale
Strongly Agree
6
 Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler 		Harvard
Strongly Agree
4
 Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton 		Princeton
Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie 		Stanford
Strongly Agree
2
 Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin 		Berkeley
Agree
6
 Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen 		Berkeley
Strongly Agree
5
 Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav 		Stanford
Strongly Agree
5
 Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair 		Yale
Agree
1
 Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein 		MIT
Strongly Agree
9
 Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee 		Chicago
Strongly Agree
10
 Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone 		University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
10
 Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall 		Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart 		Harvard
Strongly Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Holmström
Bengt Holmström 		MIT
Strongly Agree
10
 Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby 		Stanford
Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
RCTs are helpful for answering a variety of partial equilibrium questions, though of course not helpful for all questions.
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes 		Berkeley
Strongly Agree
10
 Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd 		Stanford
Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Well-constructed experiments are informative. However, one must avoid excessive generalization and extrapolation.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan 		Chicago Booth
Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap 		Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
9
 Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow 		Stanford
Strongly Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History

-see background information here
Levin
Jonathan Levin 		Stanford
Strongly Agree
4
 Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin 		Harvard
Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus 		Yale
Strongly Agree
5
 Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld 		Berkeley
Strongly Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez 		Berkeley
Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson 		Yale
Strongly Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Other tools are valuable as well, but RCTs are an important part of a balanced methodological arsenal.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman 		Columbia University
Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee 		MIT
Strongly Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro 		Berkeley
Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer 		University of Chicago
Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock 		Harvard
Strongly Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
This is a revolution in economics that has been tremendously important - not applicable everywhere but where it is, it can be definitive
Thaler
Richard Thaler 		Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
5
 Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry 		Northwestern
Strongly Agree
10
 Bio/Vote History
I'm not a disinterested bystander...
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu 		MIT
Agree
5
 Bio/Vote History
Depends on what significant means. RCTs provide valuable knowledge but development is mostly about institutions, norms, politics, technology
Alesina
Alberto Alesina 		Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji 		Yale
Strongly Agree
9
 Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach 		Berkeley
Uncertain
3
 Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor 		MIT
Strongly Agree
10
 Bio/Vote History
Significant does NOT mean that RCTs will get us all the way there. But they are indispensable in this effort.
Baicker
Katherine Baicker 		University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
3
 Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee 		MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand 		Chicago
Strongly Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier 		Princeton
Agree
6
 Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty 		Harvard
Strongly Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier 		Yale
Agree
6
 Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler 		Harvard
Strongly Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton 		Princeton
Strongly Disagree
9
 Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie 		Stanford
Agree
1
 Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin 		Berkeley
Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen 		Berkeley
Agree
5
 Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav 		Stanford
Strongly Agree
5
 Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair 		Yale
Agree
1
 Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein 		MIT
Strongly Agree
9
 Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee 		Chicago
Strongly Agree
9
 Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone 		University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall 		Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart 		Harvard
Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Holmström
Bengt Holmström 		MIT
Strongly Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby 		Stanford
Agree
6
 Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes 		Berkeley
Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd 		Stanford
Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Policies for reducing poverty must be based on a long-run perspective. Experiments that also have a long-run focus can be valuable.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan 		Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
 Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap 		Chicago Booth
Agree
1
 Bio/Vote History
External validity is complicated and as part of a confirmation process this can help, in isolation, much less clear.
Klenow
Pete Klenow 		Stanford
Strongly Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History

-see background information here
Levin
Jonathan Levin 		Stanford
Agree
3
 Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin 		Harvard
Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus 		Yale
Uncertain
3
 Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld 		Berkeley
Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez 		Berkeley
Agree
9
 Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson 		Yale
Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
The link from research to effective policy is difficult, no matter what research method, but RCTs can usefully contribute to this link.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman 		Columbia University
Agree
7
 Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee 		MIT
Uncertain
6
 Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro 		Berkeley
Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer 		University of Chicago
Uncertain
1
 Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock 		Harvard
Agree
8
 Bio/Vote History
My only caveat is that RCTs can solve some problems but not others, they are a key element of a larger suite of methods.
Thaler
Richard Thaler 		Chicago Booth
Agree
5
 Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry 		Northwestern
Strongly Agree
10
 Bio/Vote History
A tool; obviously not the only tool.
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here
-see background information here

Recent Polls

Sovereign Wealth Funds

Sovereign Wealth Funds

October 24th, 2024
Institutions and Prosperity

Institutions and Prosperity

October 22nd, 2024
Institutions and Prosperity

Institutions and Prosperity

October 22nd, 2024
Sovereign Wealth Funds

Sovereign Wealth Funds

October 15th, 2024
Constraints on Innovation in Europe

Constraints on Innovation in Europe

October 3rd, 2024