Enhanced Regulation of Private Fund Advisers

Question A:

SEC Announcement: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2023-155

The benefits of the new SEC rules on private funds - which require private funds to provide transparency to their investors regarding the fees and expenses and other terms of their relationship with private fund advisers and the performance of such private funds - substantially exceed their costs.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

The new SEC rules will have a substantially negative impact on the industry by stifling capital formation and reducing competition.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

It is appropriate policy for the SEC to impose such rules on private funds even though the investors (limited partners) are sophisticated entities.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
As private funds have grown in importance and have attracted more capital, basic transparency standards are appropriate.
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
These are bargains between sophisticated people. "Market failure" happens when a market disappears. This one is booming. Caveat emptor. Also will quash competition by adding vague regulations. Funds need lobbyists and lawyers to function. See Hester Pierce's blistering comment.
-see background information here
Cornelli
Francesca Cornelli
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
There is empirical evidence, for example of Begenau and Siriwadane, that PE fees take advantage of some limited partners relative to others.
-see background information here
Eberly
Janice Eberly
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
These investors are experienced and should be routine due diligence to ask about all fees before investing. If the fund gives them false information, the fund can be sued.
Hirshleifer
David Hirshleifer
USC
Strongly Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
The rules impose meaningful costs that disadvantage smaller funds and new entrants. There is very little benefit. Most LPs are large and sophisticated or have sophisticated advisors.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Koijen
Ralph Koijen
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Lo
Andrew Lo
MIT Sloan Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
This should lower investors' costs of comparing PE funds, and it should mitigate conflicts of interest (whereby fund managers give better terms to favored clients).
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Matvos
Gregor Matvos
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
The need for these rules seems unclear. The potential risks and harms outlined by the SEC in the final rule do not seem compelling.
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
The costs of reporting that include valuation of hard-to-value assets seem costly, particularly for small advisers, but transparency and most of the restrictions typically add value for investors. But we need research to measures and know costs and benefits.
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Investment vehicles can be complicated and transparently describing costs may be difficult.
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
High degree of uncertainty of the costs vs. benefits.
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Potential inefficiencies (and rents) seem to be large in this sector.
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Sufi
Amir Sufi
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
While compliance is costly, the rule will bring more transparency, and competition to the PE space which will benefit a quickly growing customer base. Due diligence costs for investors will go down.
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The SEC regulations are milder than those originally proposed and are unlikely to have a large impact on the industry.
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Negative impact on industry, yes. Will turn it in to a few large more monopolistic firms that are good with regulators. Capital formation, no. This is expensive fingers on scales of bilateral negotiations of large institutions, won't affect stock prices or flow of investment.
Cornelli
Francesca Cornelli
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
More transparency of fees would stifle competition? That's not true in most other markets. E.g., price transparency in corporate bond markets has been shown to lower investors costs, on average. There is a risk, though, that entry into PE markets could be reduced by lower rents.
-see background information here
Eberly
Janice Eberly
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
On the contrary – disclosures, if they’re not too costly, increase competition.
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hirshleifer
David Hirshleifer
USC
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Substantial is a high bar.
Koijen
Ralph Koijen
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Lo
Andrew Lo
MIT Sloan Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Matvos
Gregor Matvos
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
The burden of the rules does not seem big enough to cause a substantial negative impact.
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
While there will be concerns in the industry about legal liability, these additional protections may also draw more investors in and more funds from existing investors. And if these are costs, finance will find a way to provide the funding.
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
The costs will disproportionally affect smaller managers or those who are developing non-traditional assets.
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Sufi
Amir Sufi
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Specialized auditors will develop to do this reporting work efficiently after an initial period of start-up costs.
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Sophistication is a relative term, and while private LP's are more sophisticated than retail mutual fund investors, they can still benefit from transparency regulation.
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Regulalors always underestimate heterogeneity. These are sophisticated investors. Smaller investors do cost more.
Cornelli
Francesca Cornelli
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Is there a market failure? Maybe. Investors that have enough wealth are deemed "sophisticated,' but need not be, and can be exploited. Mandatory transparency can help, and can increase competition.
-see background information here
Eberly
Janice Eberly
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
It’s a tough call, but a priori many investors are not so sophisticated. And markets with “shrouded attributes” are inefficient if a too large fraction of clients are unsophisticated.
-see background information here
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
The original 1933 act was designed to protect retail investors. Sophisticated investors should know better.
Hirshleifer
David Hirshleifer
USC
Strongly Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Koijen
Ralph Koijen
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Lo
Andrew Lo
MIT Sloan Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
There is substantial heterogeneity in the level of investor sophistication, even among this set of investors. Also, even sophisticated investors can incur substantial costs to 'learn' the true costs of these funds
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Matvos
Gregor Matvos
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
It is appropriate to impose these rules, which are about transparency, even if the investors are "sophisticated", though I'm not sure how "sophisticated" they really are.
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rich does not mean sophisticated.
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
The resources of the SEC are limited and best used to protect retail investors.
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Not all LPs are sophisticated. And even sophisticated ones can benefit from shopping efficiently (knowing the menu).
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
The LPs, as qualified purchasers, may well be "sophisticated," but that does not imply they otherwise receive the relevant information at issue here.
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Sufi
Amir Sufi
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Many institutional investors lack the resources (especially human capital and time) to do thorough due diligence. And there is enormous duplication of effort. With rising private asset ownership, more investor protection is warranted.
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History