US

AT&T and Time Warner

A merger of AT&T and Time Warner would likely increase consumer surplus over the ensuing decade.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
This is one where the actual data that will be evaluated by the agencies is crucial to forming a conclusion.
-see background information here
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
we've had 2 previous waves of media content+distribution conglomerates. they failed badly. no econ of scope. broke up. What's different now?
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
As I pointed out earlier, this question is incoherent. Consumer surplus is not a general-equilibrium concept. It holds only in a market.
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Possible but no reason to think it is likely It may not even be good for the two firms. The merged entity may have too much political power.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
ATT and Time Warner stocks lost $10 billion at deal announcement. Questions opportunity to raise prices and efficiency gains.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
There are arguments pushing in either direction.
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Strongly Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
It is not clear what synergies would provide the foundation for increased consumer surplus, nor are the effects on competition clear.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
This is mostly vertical integration, which should reduce double marginalization.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Bigger does not always mean worse. As a United flier ny consumer surplus went up when they merged with Continental. Don't know here.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History