US Economic Experts Panel

The Clark Center for Global Markets explores economists’ views on vital policy issues via our US and European Economic Experts Panels. We regularly poll over 80 economists on a range of timely and relevant topics. Panelists not only have the opportunity to respond to a poll’s statements, but an opportunity to comment and provide additional resources, if they wish. The Clark Center then shares the results with the public in a straightforward and concise format.

Please note that from September 2022, the language in our polls will use just two modifiers to refer to the size of an effect:

  • ‘Substantial’: when an effect is large enough that it would make a difference that matters for the behavior involved.
  • ‘Measurable’: when the direction of the effect is clear, but perhaps experts would differ as to whether it is substantial.
US

Sovereign Wealth Funds

Question A:

The Democrats and Republicans have floated the idea of a US sovereign wealth fund. For background, see here and here.

Establishing a domestic sovereign wealth fund to invest in infrastructure, emerging technologies, and/or strategic sectors would bring substantial benefits to the US economy over a ten-year horizon.

Responses

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology
Question B:

The typical advanced economy could substantially boost growth by establishing a sovereign wealth fund to invest in infrastructure, emerging technologies, and/or strategic sectors.

Responses

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology
Question C:

For a typical advanced economy, establishing a sovereign wealth fund would be substantially better for citizens relative to paying down the debt as a use for excess revenue.

Responses

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology
 
Read More
Economic Growth, Development, & Productivity
US

Election Economic Policy Ideas

Question A:

Giving the President more direct influence over monetary policy would lead to substantially worse monetary policy decisions.

Responses

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology
Question B:

Imposing tariffs results in a substantial portion of the tariffs being borne by consumers of the country that enacts the tariffs, through price increases.

Responses

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology
Question C:

There is little empirical evidence that price gouging is causing high grocery prices.

Responses

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology
Question D:

Widespread use of price controls creates substantial economic distortions.

Responses

Source: Clark Center Economic Experts Panel
Methodology
 
Read More
International Trade & Exchange Rates
US

National Rent Caps

This US survey examines: (a) Capping annual rent increases by corporate landlords at 5%, as proposed by President Biden, would make middle-income Americans substantially better off over the next ten years; (b) Capping annual rent increases at 5%, as proposed by President Biden, would substantially reduce the amount of available apartments for rent over the next ten years; (c) Capping annual rent increases at 5%, as proposed by President Biden, would substantially reduce US income inequality over the next ten years 
Read More
Investment, Infrastructure, & Cities
US

Tax Cuts Extension

This US survey examines (a) All else equal, making permanent the 2017 tax cuts that were set to expire at the end of 2025 would substantially increase federal deficits and the federal debt over the coming decade; (b) All else equal, making permanent the 2017 tax cuts that were set to expire at the end of 2025 would measurably increase the rate of US economic growth over the coming decade, (c) In the US, given Congressional budget scoring rules, temporary tax cuts generate sufficient pressure for extension as to be effectively permanent 
Read More
Economic Growth, Development, & Productivity
US

Publicly Traded Firms, Private Firms and the Economy

This US survey examines (a) The lower willingness of private firms to go public, combined with the increased number of publicly traded firms being taken private over the last 25 years, is measurably net negative for economic growth; (b) All else equal, reducing regulatory barriers (including reporting requirements such as Sarbanes Oxley 404) to public listing would substantially increase the share of publicly traded firms in the economy; (c) The lack of transparency about unlisted private firms' financial performance substantially hinders the efficiency of the allocation of capital 
Read More
Business, Management, & Corporate Performance
US

Regulating AI

This US survey examines: (a) Antitrust investigations of the dominant firms in artificial intelligence are likely to lead to substantially lower prices of AI products and services for businesses and consumers; (b) Antitrust investigations of the dominant firms in artificial intelligence are likely to promote greater competition and innovation in AI; (c) Potential harms from artificial intelligence are better assessed by market deployment rather than seeking to slow the pace of AI research and implementation 
Read More
Regulation, Competition, & Market Power
US

Tariffs on Chinese Electric Vehicles

This US survey examines (a) The proposed US tariffs on Chinese EVs would lead to measurably higher employment in the US automotive industry over the next five years; (b) The proposed US tariffs on Chinese EVs would lead to measurably higher prices of EVs in the US; (c) The proposed US tariffs on Chinese EVs would measurably slow the adoption of green technology by consumers 
Read More
Environment, Climate Change, & Natural Resources
US

Tariffs

This US survey examines (a) Tripling existing import taxes on Chinese steel and aluminum products would lead to measurably higher employment in the US steel industry over the next five years; (b) Tripling the tariffs would lead to measurably higher steel and aluminum prices for American producers and measurably higher finished-good prices for American consumers; (c) The gains for the American economy from tripling the tariffs would measurably outweigh the losses. 
Read More
International Trade & Exchange Rates
Subscribe for Updates

Topics

BankingBondsBusiness Cycles, Recessions, & CrisesBusiness, Management, & Corporate PerformanceCorporate GovernanceDemocracy, Government, & Public PolicyDemographics, Aging, & GenderEconomic Growth, Development, & ProductivityEconomists, Economic Theory, & Economic OrganizationsEducation & SkillsEnvironment, Climate Change, & Natural ResourcesFinance and the EconomyFinancial CrisesFinancial Markets & BankingFinancial RegulationHealthcare & WellbeingInternational FinanceInternational Trade & Exchange RatesInvestment ManagementInvestment, Infrastructure, & CitiesInvestmentsJobs, Pay, & UnemploymentMigrationMonetary Policy, Interest Rates, & InflationPersonal FinancePoverty, Inequality, & Social MobilityPublic Debt & DeficitsRegulation, Competition, & Market PowerScience, Technology, & InnovationSocial Policy & SocietyTaxes & Public SpendingTransport

Popular "On Global Markets" Articles

Stablecoins vs Bank Deposits

Stablecoins vs Bank Deposits

February 20th, 2026
A New Kind of AI Worry

A New Kind of AI Worry

March 9th, 2026
Housing Affordability

Housing Affordability

March 13th, 2026

Recent Polls

AI and Stock Prices

AI and Stock Prices

March 6th, 2026
Emissions Regulation

Emissions Regulation

February 26th, 2026
Emissions Regulation

Emissions Regulation

February 26th, 2026
Interest-Bearing Stablecoins

Interest-Bearing Stablecoins

February 17th, 2026
Housing Affordability

Housing Affordability

February 11th, 2026