Windsor Framework

Question A:

The amendments to the Northern Ireland protocol agreed by the UK and the EU are unlikely to have a measurable direct impact on UK growth over the next two years.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

If renewed UK-EU scientific cooperation were achieved in the wake of the Windsor framework, it would be likely to have a measurable positive impact on UK growth over the next five years.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
The protocol is likely to reset EU-UK relations. It will set the stage for a much more harmonious relationship, which could well have a measurable effect on UK growth.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Taking a more pro-EU approach and reducing uncertainty could improve British growth. This is unwinding a little of the craziest bits of Brexit.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Could reduce the level of institutional uncertainty and unlock future agreements such as UK-US. But probably limited impact in the short term.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
Sciences Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Direct effect will be small given that Northern Ireland accounts for only 2 per cent of the UK GDP. Indirect and longer term effects could be greater if the deal unlocks improved UK-EU cooperation.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
The Northern Ireland trade volume is limited in size, relative to the UK economy. The importance of "Windsor" agreement is more symbolic, and it eases the path towards better collaboration between UK and EU in the future. In this indirect way, there agreement may impact growth.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Better relations with the EU can increase business and investor confidence
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
There will be longer term positive effects (investment in NI, rejoining Horizon programme, ...) but nothing significant that soon.
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
They help the UK move on and start many other reforms it needs.
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Effect is small, but on Northern Ireland will be non-trivial. In general effets of Brexit have been large and negative and will continue to be so for decades
-see background information here
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Not sure. It will definitely boost economy of Northern Ireland. It may even be at the expense of the economy of Great Britain. It is all madness, since before Brexit most Northern Ireland and Great Britain already had access to each others' markets and those of the EU.
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Positive but unclear whether a measurable impact in two years
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Very little in trade policy has much impact in the short run but it is important for the UK’s long-term prosperity that it have good economic relations with its nearest neighbours.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
The impact of local research on growth is likely to be small, at best.

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Difficult to say how effective this collabortion will be. The last few years have been quite difficult for the relationship.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
. Not first order anyway and 5 years is likely too short to see measurable effects
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Is this a trick question? It takes far more than 5 years for a rise in basic science funding to impact GDP - think more like 10 to 30 years :-)
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Scientific cooperation is always good for growth. But takes time to materialize.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
This would obviously be very positive but it is hard to be sure that the impact would be significantly positive within 5 years.
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
Sciences Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
The deal unlocks potential improvements in UK-EU economic cooperation removing some of the uncertainty that holds back UK investment post-Brexit. (Also could remove certain medium term threats to the Northern Ireland and Ireland economies).
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Actual scientific collaboration will not change by much (with or without the framework), and I guess that UK will substitute for EU money anyway - given that net funding of Research via EU is close to zero anyway (note: participation in Horizon program requires co-funding by UK).
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Effect is likely directionally positive, but scientific progress takes time to manifest in growth.
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
At 5-year horizon, positive effects on research (e.g. in biotech) and associated economic activity are likely - but growth effects not huge.
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Science and education are two of the few world-leading industries in the country
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
UK re-joining Horizon is fantastic news and great for UK and EU science. But the lags between research, innovation and growth are long, variable and uncertain
-see background information here
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
The demise of Horizon, ERC and other EU grants is a disaster for UK universities, and the potential innovations necessary to fuel growth. I do not have much confidence that this will be resolved in the same manner as it was before Brexit.
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The question contains a big “if”. Failure to renew cooperation could be quite damaging for the UK economy.
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
The sign of the impact is clear. It’s magnitude is not.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History