Question A:
A wealth tax would be an effective way to reduce inequality.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question B:
A wealth tax in a form discussed in the UK (where individuals could be taxed a percentage of their net worth over £750,000, excluding any personal pension savings and their main home) would be an effective way to improve public finances after the Covid-19 crisis.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question C:
A public policy goal that could be accomplished with a well-enforced wealth tax could be accomplished at lower cost with modifications to existing taxes, such as income tax, capital gains tax, inheritance tax and property tax.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question A Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Franklin Allen |
Imperial College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
A wealth tax is effective where asset prices are readily available but in many countries, particularly in Europe this is not the case.
|
||||
Pol Antras |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
Hard to argue that it would not if properly implemented (i.e., addressing potential loopholes)
|
||||
Oriana Bandiera |
London School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Olivier Blanchard |
Peterson Institute | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nicholas Bloom |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Wealth taxes have some major distortions, so it would reduce inequality but be economically very costly. Hence I would prefer an income tax.
|
||||
Richard William Blundell |
University College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Elena Carletti |
Bocconi | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jean-Pierre Danthine |
Paris School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
A wealth tax would clearly be a positive move in the intended direction. It will not be a silver bullet.
|
||||
Paul De Grauwe |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
In order to have strong redistributive effects the wealth tax should have a progressive feature
|
||||
Jan Eeckhout |
UPF Barcelona | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ernst Fehr |
Universität Zurich | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Xavier Freixas |
Barcelona GSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln |
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jordi Galí |
Barcelona GSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Francesco Giavazzi |
Bocconi | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Rachel Griffith |
University of Manchester | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Veronica Guerrieri |
Chicago Booth | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Luigi Guiso |
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance | Bio/Vote History | ||
main cause of wealth concentration is heterogeneity in returns to wealth; a feasible wealth tax can only lower heterogeneity a bit
|
||||
Sergei Guriev |
Sciences Po | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Patrick Honohan |
Trinity College Dublin | Bio/Vote History | ||
It could be, but history suggests that large loopholes would enable most of the super-rich to avoid it.
|
||||
Beata Javorcik |
University of Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jan Pieter Krahnen |
Goethe University Frankfurt | Bio/Vote History | ||
A wealth tax will lower inequality only if the resulting wealth transfer/tax avoidance activities do not outweigh the intended effect.
|
||||
Botond Kőszegi |
Central European University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eliana La Ferrara |
Harvard Kennedy | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Christian Leuz |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
It is one lever to fight ineq but lots of issues w/implementing WT well. Issues w/progressive consumption tax as alternative too, so unclear
-see background information here -see background information here |
||||
Thierry Mayer |
Sciences-Po | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Costas Meghir |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Peter Neary |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marco Pagano |
Università di Napoli Federico II | Bio/Vote History | ||
Of course much depends on how it is implemented!
|
||||
Lubos Pastor |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Much wealth is not liquid, not easy to monetize. Also incentives to hide wealth (gold, paintings).
|
||||
Torsten Persson |
Stockholm University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christopher Pissarides |
London School of Economics and Political Science | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard Portes |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Canice Prendergast |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Carol Propper |
Imperial College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Imran Rasul |
University College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Lucrezia Reichlin |
London Business School | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Rafael Repullo |
CEMFI | Bio/Vote History | ||
The effect on inequality is likely to be small.
|
||||
Hélène Rey |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Antoinette Schoar |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kjetil Storesletten |
University of Minnesota | Bio/Vote History | ||
As a tool for addressing inequality, progressive income taxes is more effective than wealth taxes
|
||||
Daniel Sturm |
London School of Economics | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
John Van Reenen |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
John Vickers |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Reform of the hotch-potch of existing capital taxes might be more effective. Simply adding to the hotch-potch could backfire.
|
||||
Hans-Joachim Voth |
University of Zurich | Bio/Vote History | ||
The superrich will find ways to avoid it - it will underimne wealth accumulation by the bottom 95%
|
||||
Karl Whelan |
University College Dublin | Bio/Vote History | ||
Just yes.
|
||||
Charles Wyplosz |
The Graduate Institute Geneva | Bio/Vote History | ||
It works but is it the best?
|
||||
Fabrizio Zilibotti |
Yale University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Question B Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Franklin Allen |
Imperial College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
It would probably not raise too much revenue if rates are low. If rates are high many people might leave so again it will not raise much.
|
||||
Pol Antras |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Oriana Bandiera |
London School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Olivier Blanchard |
Peterson Institute | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nicholas Bloom |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
All the money would leave the country. Sounds great on paper, but in the real world this would cause an rush of cash abroad, damaging the UK
|
||||
Richard William Blundell |
University College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Elena Carletti |
Bocconi | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jean-Pierre Danthine |
Paris School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
I tend to agree although I am uncertain as to the percentage of tax receipts that such a tax would raise
|
||||
Paul De Grauwe |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jan Eeckhout |
UPF Barcelona | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ernst Fehr |
Universität Zurich | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Xavier Freixas |
Barcelona GSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln |
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jordi Galí |
Barcelona GSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Francesco Giavazzi |
Bocconi | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Rachel Griffith |
University of Manchester | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Veronica Guerrieri |
Chicago Booth | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Luigi Guiso |
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance | Bio/Vote History | ||
That is like taxing the top 1%. If they have 30% of wealth and wealth to income is 3 , that would increase revenues by 1% of GDP
|
||||
Sergei Guriev |
Sciences Po | Bio/Vote History | ||
With negative yields on government debt, there is no pressure to "improve public finances"
|
||||
Patrick Honohan |
Trinity College Dublin | Bio/Vote History | ||
Could be a useful addition to the tax toolbox. Buy, where used, wealth taxes have yield relatively small percentage of tax revenue.
|
||||
Beata Javorcik |
University of Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jan Pieter Krahnen |
Goethe University Frankfurt | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Botond Kőszegi |
Central European University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eliana La Ferrara |
Harvard Kennedy | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Christian Leuz |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Know little about UK specifics but disagree w/ notion to create new tax to restore finances post covid. Perhaps one-off tax better?
|
||||
Thierry Mayer |
Sciences-Po | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Costas Meghir |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Peter Neary |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Effective yes. Politically feasible? Unclear
|
||||
Marco Pagano |
Università di Napoli Federico II | Bio/Vote History | ||
Much depends on the tax rate and on tax enforcement.
|
||||
Lubos Pastor |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Torsten Persson |
Stockholm University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christopher Pissarides |
London School of Economics and Political Science | Bio/Vote History | ||
A tax on excess profits made during the pandemic by the likes of Amazon and Ocado would be much better
|
||||
Richard Portes |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Canice Prendergast |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Carol Propper |
Imperial College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
While a wealth tax is a good idea, there are evasion/avoidance issues that need to be tackled, and the higher the rate, the more of this.
|
||||
Imran Rasul |
University College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Lucrezia Reichlin |
London Business School | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Rafael Repullo |
CEMFI | Bio/Vote History | ||
The effect on public finances is likely to be small.
|
||||
Hélène Rey |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Antoinette Schoar |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kjetil Storesletten |
University of Minnesota | Bio/Vote History | ||
Tax base is small after deducting main home plus net worth of $1,000,000. Therefore tax rate must be very large to raise substantial revenue
|
||||
Daniel Sturm |
London School of Economics | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
John Van Reenen |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
John Vickers |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hans-Joachim Voth |
University of Zurich | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Karl Whelan |
University College Dublin | Bio/Vote History | ||
Not sure about the framing. Arguments for a wealth tax should not be about "fixing public finances". Exclusions from the tax seem big.
|
||||
Charles Wyplosz |
The Graduate Institute Geneva | Bio/Vote History | ||
RIch people move, with their feet and their tax-advisors.
|
||||
Fabrizio Zilibotti |
Yale University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Question C Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Franklin Allen |
Imperial College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
Probably there's an MM type theorem out there but whether the assumptions are reasonable is doubtful. Monetary policy may be a better way.
|
||||
Pol Antras |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Oriana Bandiera |
London School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Olivier Blanchard |
Peterson Institute | Bio/Vote History | ||
not sure about the ``lower cost'' part. there are equivalence theorems, and then it depends on implementation problems.
|
||||
Nicholas Bloom |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Having worked in the UK treasury on tax policy - and dealt with taxes in the real world - details matter. A wealth tax would not work well.
|
||||
Richard William Blundell |
University College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Elena Carletti |
Bocconi | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jean-Pierre Danthine |
Paris School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
Other taxes may be more efficient at raising funds. Green taxes may be less distortionary. A wealth tax should be part of the package!
|
||||
Paul De Grauwe |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jan Eeckhout |
UPF Barcelona | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ernst Fehr |
Universität Zurich | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Xavier Freixas |
Barcelona GSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln |
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jordi Galí |
Barcelona GSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Francesco Giavazzi |
Bocconi | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Rachel Griffith |
University of Manchester | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Veronica Guerrieri |
Chicago Booth | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Luigi Guiso |
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Sergei Guriev |
Sciences Po | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Patrick Honohan |
Trinity College Dublin | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Beata Javorcik |
University of Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jan Pieter Krahnen |
Goethe University Frankfurt | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Botond Kőszegi |
Central European University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eliana La Ferrara |
Harvard Kennedy | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Christian Leuz |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Equivalence w/ capital income tax under some conditions; some arguments in favor of WT (see below), but there are also inher and prop taxes.
-see background information here |
||||
Thierry Mayer |
Sciences-Po | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Costas Meghir |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Peter Neary |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
In principle, yes. Raising capital gains tax in particular would tax flows of new wealth. But a wealth tax is still desirable.
|
||||
Marco Pagano |
Università di Napoli Federico II | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Lubos Pastor |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Torsten Persson |
Stockholm University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christopher Pissarides |
London School of Economics and Political Science | Bio/Vote History | ||
The administration of a wealth tax would be a nightmare and the ones that will get away will be the wealthiest. More money for accountants
|
||||
Richard Portes |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Canice Prendergast |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Carol Propper |
Imperial College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Imran Rasul |
University College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Lucrezia Reichlin |
London Business School | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Rafael Repullo |
CEMFI | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hélène Rey |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
depends on implementation
|
||||
Antoinette Schoar |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kjetil Storesletten |
University of Minnesota | Bio/Vote History | ||
Property taxes can raise large revenue with small distortions. Use progressive income taxes and dividend taxes to address inequality
|
||||
Daniel Sturm |
London School of Economics | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
John Van Reenen |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
John Vickers |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hans-Joachim Voth |
University of Zurich | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Karl Whelan |
University College Dublin | Bio/Vote History | ||
There are lots of ways to tax wealth but objections to raising inheritance taxes etc. will be just as strong as objections to a wealth tax.
|
||||
Charles Wyplosz |
The Graduate Institute Geneva | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Fabrizio Zilibotti |
Yale University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|