Question A:
Network externalities give Twitter an incumbent advantage that will slow substantially the migration of users who would prefer alternative platforms.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question B:
As of now, there needs to be more government regulation around Twitter’s content moderation and personal data protection.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question A Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Of course, software, design and services also matter. But networks are social media platforms' most valuable asset.
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
It takes years for these incumbency advantages to erode, but it happens! Think of MySpace, Friendster, and Facebook...
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
Positive feedback from network effects help you take off, but they make it easier to spiral downhill. Easy come, easy go. If a better alternative draws customers despite the incumbent advantage as it grows it enjoys positive feedback and if twitter shrinks it has negative.
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
That is, there is competition for the market more than competition in the market
|
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Many services create network externalities that hinder entry. Twitter is not unique in that regard. Also, other services have successfully entered -- TikTok and many others that an old man like me do not use.
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Network externalities are especially important in social media, calling for new research and new regulation and policy tools.
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
An advantage, yes, but no reason to expect it will substantially slow migration. MySpace fell to Facebook rapidly, and Facebook displaced other networks overseas rather quickly.
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
Network externalities slow migration initially but speed it after some point
|
||||
James Stock |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Is this a question about network externalities or a prediction of the future. Because status quo bias is also a big factor. People stick to (say) banks even after fraud convictions. Either way, twitter will be hard to topple.
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
Question B Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
The network-nature of social media platforms means that there are myriad economic and social externalities, and there is no reason to think that either the platforms or users will internalize them.
-see background information here -see background information here |
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
I would say yes except that I have no idea what workable legislation would look like
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
any possible regulation should not be specific to Twitter and requires public discussion about freedom of speech.
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
You would think that losing $40n of your own money would encourage someone to figure it out on their own
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
At a minimum the same rules as for newspapers.
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
I see no reason why content regulation on Twitter should exceed regulation of newspapers and magazines, or regulation of what material is sent via US Mail. Twitter is just a cheaper way of communication. Privacy protections are necessary.
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Depends on what the regulation would be!
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
This would be legally and politically divisive in the extreme. Perhaps a consensus would form in the future but impossible now.
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
This is the case for social media more generally.
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
I agree reluctantly, because the status quo is so unsatisfactory, but I don't know what exact form of regulation can be relied upon to do more good than harm. And the exact form of regulatio is what matters.
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
The government should not regulate content on Twitter any more than it should regulate the content of the NYTimes or Fox News. Personal data protection should not be different at Twitter than at other platforms.
|
||||
James Stock |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
I don’t see how government regulation can work on content. How would that regulation have worked during the Trump administration? What about cable news? Hard problem. Is there a successful model we can learn from? Not an expert.
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|