US

Taxing Capital and Labor

Question A:

One drawback of taxing capital income at a lower rate than labor income is that it gives people incentives to relabel income that policymakers find hard to categorize as "capital" rather than labor".

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Despite relabeling concerns, taxing capital income at a permanently lower rate than labor income would result in higher average long-term prosperity, relative to an alternative that generated the same amount of tax revenue by permanently taxing capital and labor income at equal rates instead.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Although they do not always agree about the precise likely effects of different tax policies, another reason why economists often give disparate advice on tax policy is because they hold differing views about choices between raising average prosperity and redistributing income.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
See work of Diamond and Saez in JEP: The Case for a Progressive Tax: From Basic Research to Policy Recommendations
-see background information here
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Currie
Janet Currie
Princeton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
The incentive this creates to recategorize is clear. That this results in a drawback seems right, but less clear to me.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Goldin
Claudia Goldin
Harvard
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
yes
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Apart from the issue of carried interest, this is not a big issue in taxation.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
don't know how successful they are, but the incentives are clear
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Lazear
Edward Lazear
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shin
Hyun Song Shin
Princeton
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
See Romney, Mitt.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Zingales
Luigi Zingales
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Two things are ott confused. Continuously taxing savings is hugely inefficient. Taxing income at source even if it is capital income isn't.
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
My fear is that the distortions from relabeling the potential gains from lower capital taxes in the second best world in which we live.
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Currie
Janet Currie
Princeton
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
I prefer not to think of all capital as the same.
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
This seems right on average to me, but does it need to be true under all conditions? Of this I am less confident.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldin
Claudia Goldin
Harvard
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
lots of conflicting results in the research in this area
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Standard theory is clear that this is good for growth but empirical work is less clear. Is std theory wrong or is evidence not credible?
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Mirrlees-type arguments for taxation of the return to capital involve a sacrifice of the total size of the pot to bring about redistribution
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
But the levels of rates matter and just getting the rate capital down might have no meaningful effects.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Not what every study finds, but most I have seen.
-see background information here
Lazear
Edward Lazear
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
this is probably true if "average prosperity" means income per capita
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shin
Hyun Song Shin
Princeton
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Most evidence points to technical change as the main force behind long run growth. Capital accumulation plays a role only in the short run.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
If you tax investment income what will people do? Stuff their money in the mattress?
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Zingales
Luigi Zingales
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Main reasons: diffs in social prefs and differ in priors about "elasticity" of responses to taxes + regs. Most agree on signs not magnitudes
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Currie
Janet Currie
Princeton
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
I don't like the phrasing of 'average' in the question.
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
My anecdotal experience is that economists differ widely on the relative costs of income heterogeneity (equity versus efficiency).
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Goldin
Claudia Goldin
Harvard
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
The key parameter is the elasticity of substitution in the social welfare function across people. We don't agree on that.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
This is a powerful factor that is often overlooked: the efficiency vs equity debate is still alive, even if sometimes hidden.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Positive (more agreement) vs. Normative (less agreement).
Lazear
Edward Lazear
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
if "average prosperity" means average income per capita
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shin
Hyun Song Shin
Princeton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
duh
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Zingales
Luigi Zingales
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History