US

Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program

Question A:

By providing electronic benefit cards to choose and buy groceries at stores, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program currently does more for its recipients' well-being than it would if the program directly provided a smaller array of foods to its recipients, while commensurately reducing the amount they could spend on groceries of their own choosing.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

By providing electronic benefit cards to choose and buy groceries at stores, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program currently does more to raise food security and reduce hunger than it would if the program directly provided a smaller array of foods to its recipients, while commensurately reducing the amount they could spend on groceries of their own choosing.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Food stamp recipients are generally not starving but they are poor. Fungibility of resources more useful than boxes of prefab meals
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
In the end, the political economy would be less favorable, and the benefit less likely to last. Quite apart from economic effects.
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Boxes might "nudge" recipients in healthier directions, but this is uncertain. Moreover, delivery and special diet problems would be severe
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein
MIT
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Tastes vary and and so people will be better off if they can chooses what to eat.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
The tradeoff is (i) possibly more nutritious food if selected paternalistically versus (ii) food aligned w family's specific needs.
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
In the past (50's, 60's) before food stamps, poor people were given surplus peanut butter and cheese. Not a good idea then or now.
-see background information here
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Despite stereotypes of the incompetent poor, there is little reason to believe the government is a more efficient shopper than are people.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
We should be giving more choice to recipients, with a conditional cash transfer program, instead of adopting this central-planning proposal.
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
People who give different answers likely have different concepts of well-being.
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
9, not 10 because of tiny chance that a beautifully-designed nudge from a basket of healthy goods would make recipients happier in long run.

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Economic insecurity of food stamp recipients would rise if their choices were further constrained. Not clear that hunger is the main issue
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Again, the political economy is the vital factor, and which suppliers benefit.
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Since SNAP can be restricted to certain SKUs, it is silly to debate in-kind provision.Nutrition could be improved & specificity maintaind
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Adding a procurement-and-distribution system to SNAP would increase costs, without obviously making the program more effective.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
The answer depends on the importance of recipient choices that make them happy but are nutritionally poor. I have no idea.
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History