US

Publicly Traded Firms, Private Firms and the Economy

Question A:

The lower willingness of private firms to go public, combined with the increased number of publicly traded firms being taken private over the last 25 years, is measurably net negative for economic growth.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

All else equal, reducing regulatory barriers (including reporting requirements such as Sarbanes Oxley 404) to public listing would substantially increase the share of publicly traded firms in the economy.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

The lack of transparency about unlisted private firms' financial performance substantially hinders the efficiency of the allocation of capital.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Public firms have better access to credit and their actions may be more transparent, but it is not clear whether having fewer public firms has become a major factor in economic growth. Public firms may be subject to more short-termist pressure as well.
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
The balance of public and private markets may change over time.
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
There are too many factors at work to say this.
-see background information here
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
There are pluses and minuses to being public and none are fully understood. For example, public firms may be more concerned with short term financial results or accounting instead of economic profits.
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Loss of investment opportunities for the broader public is a significant negative.
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The risk-sharing function of public equity allows firms to raise large amounts of capital efficiently.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Economic growth in the U.S. and world has been solid. Private equity tends to improve productivity.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
see the explanation following the next two questions
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
The answer depends on why this has happened. Improvements in private equity should help growth. Worsening conditions for publicly-traded companies hurts growth.
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
I'm not clear on this one at all. Maybe startups' strategy shift from IPO to acquisition is somewhat harmful, but beyond that I just don't know.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
This sounds reasonable but I do not know the specific evidence supporting or contradicting it.
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
But there is no obvious implication that this way of getting them listed is desirable
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
In just about any activity where there is entry at the margin, lowering the cost of entry increases the quantity of entry.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
But that does not mean it's a good idea
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Excessive regulation has reduced attraction to list.
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
It is easy to blame regulation but other important factors are taxes, the concentration of wealth, and the technological improvements in organizing that wealth as private equity.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Economics 101. Regulation and costs to being public appear to have increased over time.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
There are plenty of reporting burdens that public firms face, not clear that they are all constructive
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Other factors, such as increases in private capital and the increased importance of intangible assets also lead to the reduction in the number of public forms, so it is difficult to assess the importance of regulatory barriers.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Reporting requirements are costly but associated enforcement by government and penalties lower agency costs.
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
If you reduce the cost of doing something that is beneficial to someone, they will do more of it.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Holding constant the wide distribution of investors typical of public firms, this is obvious. But private firms have far more concentrated ownership, with a substantial degree of direct shareholder oversight.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
With apologies for the self-reference, this paper demonstrates the benefits of SEC mandatory disclosure rules.
-see background information here
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The lack of transparency of large private firms is bad for many reasons including that we don't know about the environmental damage they are causing
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Transparency is necessary for the market to efficiently aggregate information.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
The lack of transparency definitely hinders the allocation and judging the quantitative impact is hard. This is the downside of the rise in the share of private firms.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
When corporations can hide their business plans, it allows them to have strategies that are illegal or would be made illegal if governments realized what was happening. Investments in these business models are inefficient and wrong.
-see background information here
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
I would defer strongly to my accounting colleagues here.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History