Question A:
All else equal, Patent Assertion Entities — which specialize in acquiring and asserting patents and are popularly known as “patent trolls" — promote innovation in the U.S.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question B:
Within the software industry, the US patent system makes consumers better off than they would be in the absence of patents.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question A Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
It creates incentives for many spurious patents that might actually block innovation.
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Janet Currie |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Allowing more competition for patent rights is good, but frictions in that market might suggest barring trolls. I'm uncertain.
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
No definitive evidence but available evidence points negative. See references
-see background information here |
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
If patents are correctly granted trolls can encourage innovation. if patents are incorrectly granted trolls can impede innovation.
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
This may just be rent seeking but how can this activity be prevented without destroying the transferability of patents, a form of property?
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Conclusive evidence is difficult to come by, but there appears to be no evidence that they have a positive effect.
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Not simple. Probably encourages independent inventors & small firms, but their weak-basis lawsuits are a tax on other innovators.
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
Patent trolls pay for patents, which encourages innovation, but they obviously also suppress future innovation
|
||||
Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
In some fields they seem to impede innovation. I applaud Tesla's recent decision to release all their patents.
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Question B Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
A lot of the open source software has been hugely influential.
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Janet Currie |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
The usual incentive-for-innovation justification for patent protection seems to apply here, as in many other markets.
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
There is a lot of room for improvement of the current system, but without any patents at all, there would be no incentives to innovate.
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
Patents can encourage innovation. But many trivial software patents seem to be granted, which can discourage innovation and hurt consumers.
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Example: Economists oppose software development in economics. Innovation would be further reduced if there were no financial returns.
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Open source is at least a viable alternative. Patents have advantages, but their net effect is unclear.
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
A sensible system for software patens would clearly be better than nothing. The current system? Not so clear.
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
Very much a quantitative question.
|
||||
Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
This is the domain in which the patent system seems to be in most need of reform.
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|