US

Patents

Question A:

All else equal, Patent Assertion Entities — which specialize in acquiring and asserting patents and are popularly known as “patent trolls" — promote innovation in the U.S.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Within the software industry, the US patent system makes consumers better off than they would be in the absence of patents.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
It creates incentives for many spurious patents that might actually block innovation.
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Currie
Janet Currie
Princeton
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Allowing more competition for patent rights is good, but frictions in that market might suggest barring trolls. I'm uncertain.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
No definitive evidence but available evidence points negative. See references
-see background information here
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
If patents are correctly granted trolls can encourage innovation. if patents are incorrectly granted trolls can impede innovation.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
This may just be rent seeking but how can this activity be prevented without destroying the transferability of patents, a form of property?
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Conclusive evidence is difficult to come by, but there appears to be no evidence that they have a positive effect.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Not simple. Probably encourages independent inventors & small firms, but their weak-basis lawsuits are a tax on other innovators.
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Patent trolls pay for patents, which encourages innovation, but they obviously also suppress future innovation
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
In some fields they seem to impede innovation. I applaud Tesla's recent decision to release all their patents.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Strongly Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
A lot of the open source software has been hugely influential.
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Currie
Janet Currie
Princeton
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
The usual incentive-for-innovation justification for patent protection seems to apply here, as in many other markets.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
There is a lot of room for improvement of the current system, but without any patents at all, there would be no incentives to innovate.
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Patents can encourage innovation. But many trivial software patents seem to be granted, which can discourage innovation and hurt consumers.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Example: Economists oppose software development in economics. Innovation would be further reduced if there were no financial returns.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Open source is at least a viable alternative. Patents have advantages, but their net effect is unclear.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
A sensible system for software patens would clearly be better than nothing. The current system? Not so clear.
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Very much a quantitative question.
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
This is the domain in which the patent system seems to be in most need of reform.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History