Question A:
Giving tax incentives to specific firms to locate operations in a city or state typically generates local benefits that outweigh the costs to the city and/or state providing the incentives.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question B:
The US as a whole benefits when cities or states compete with each other by giving tax incentives to firms to locate operations in their jurisdictions.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question A Participant Responses
| Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
 Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
 David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
If it was not to the benefit of the local government, why would they do it?
|
||||
 Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
The competition is fierce and the benefits uncertain. Winners curse is likely.
|
||||
 Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
 Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
 Robert Hall |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
 Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
If it's done carefully--the firms can't get the tax benefits and then leave--this can pay off for a city or state.
|
||||
 Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
 Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
It is difficult to believe that taxation decisions are consistent with cost-benefit analysis.
|
||||
 Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Of cours deals differ but usually the taxpayers get fleeced for a limited number of jobs that get relocated
|
||||
 Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
It has local benefits, but the costs can outweigh them (e.g., if far enough beyond the peak of the Laffer Curve).
-see background information here |
||||
 Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Benefits are wildly exaggerated in the popular press, and we lack definitive scientific evidence either way.
|
||||
 José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Well documented that subsidies to sport stadiums yield negative returns and no reason to believe that it is better for other industries
|
||||
 Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
I doubt it but don't recall seeing anything rigorous on this.
|
||||
 Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
 Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
See Greenstone, Hornbeck, and Moretti (JPE 2010) for some evidence of large positive spillovers
|
||||
 Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
I don't see how anyone can have an opinion about this without data. A $1 tax break is worth it. $100B not. In between?
|
||||
 Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
Question B Participant Responses
| Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Such competition helps for local political economy reasons but may shift too much otherwise-public resources towards footloose companies.
|
||||
|
Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
|
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
I would agree if I were certain that governors had their states' long term interests in mind when cutting tax deals. Not sure that's true.
|
||||
|
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
|
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
On its face, this sort of competition is useful. I can imagine that experts on this issue may suggest some unintended related distortions.
|
||||
|
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
|
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
|
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
|
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
There is no social benefit to the US as a whole unless the firms would have located abroad. There is a social loss from lower tax receipts.
|
||||
|
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
|
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
This is almost entirely zero sum, with the companies gaining and the taxpayers losing.
|
||||
|
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
It could help if tax rates tend to be too high for political economy reasons.
-see background information here |
||||
|
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Generally a waste of revenues in negative-sum game.
|
||||
|
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Such competitive does enhance allocative efficiency, but its primary effect is to transfer surplus from other taxpayers to firms.
|
||||
|
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Would agree if cities compete with uniform lower taxes for all firms.
|
||||
|
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Unless the firm would otherwise locate abroad, the only net effect is less tax revenue. The EU bans state aid for this reason.
|
||||
|
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
|
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
There is a clear zero-sum aspect to tax competition. But nothing else can restrain the leviathan. The balance is unclear.
|
||||
|
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Again data would be nice. Competition is good but unraveling is bad. Which is this? Transparency would help.
|
||||
|
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
