‘Getting Brexit Done’

Question A:

Following the UK election result, the certainty that the country is going to leave the European Union will provide a substantial short-term boost to the UK economy.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Given that the transition period currently expires at the end of 2020, there is still a considerable risk that the UK will leave the European Union without a trade agreement.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Leaving the European Union without a trade agreement would have a large negative impact on the UK economy.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Investment has been low since the Brexit vote. Now there is more clarity after the election it should increase.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Decline in uncertainty will be good for the economy, but there may be other transitional costs
Besley
Timothy J. Besley
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Two effects. The certainty of Brexit: bad. The removal of the uncertainty and option value: good. (+ election of a tory: good for business)
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
More certainty on higher transaction costs: net effect is unclear.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The uncertainty about the trade deal will remain dampening optimism
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Giavazzi
Francesco Giavazzi
Bocconi
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Reduction in risk of no-deal exit helps, but reduced chance of remain does not.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Kleven
Henrik Kleven
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The demise of the "fork" (in versus out) reduces ambiguity greatly, allowing longer term planning once again.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Uncertainty resolution is positive, but it made Brexit near certainty. So bump might not be large. Still huge uncertainty about trade deal.
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Neary
Peter Neary
Oxford
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
This could happen if confidence improves, but exchange rate fluctuations in the first post-election week suggest markets are unconvinced
-see background information here
O'Rourke
Kevin O'Rourke
Oxford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
There is still going to be uncertainty about whether or not there will be a trade deal. So any effect would be small.
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Brexit uncertainty has been a dampener on investment. There will be a boost, although maybe not substantial until we know the deal
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Economy stagnating recently. Some uncertainty now resolved, so psychological effects on consumers, maybe starts on some delayed investments
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
There is great uncertainty about the path that will be chosen, from no deal to soft Brexit.
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Brexit is a certain economic bad, so the fact this will happen outweighs any benefits from the reduction in uncertainty
-see background information here
-see background information here
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Net effect of withdrawal certainty and heightened trade agreement uncertainty, given PM's commitment not to extend transition, is unclear
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Weder di Mauro
Beatrice Weder di Mauro
The Graduate Institute, Geneva
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
There is still considerable uncertainty for firms (particularly in services) about the nature of the UK's future trading relationship.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Some uncertainty is removed but the trade agreement remains to be negociated
Zilibotti
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Yale University
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The law outlawing extension appears to be a negotiating strategy. There is a risk that they don't the deal.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
This question is about politics, not economics. Judging from what Johnson said today (12/17), there will be a deal. But what do I know?!
Besley
Timothy J. Besley
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
There will likely be an agreement; the problem is its content.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Giavazzi
Francesco Giavazzi
Bocconi
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
the difficulty will arise from the incompatibility between free trade US-UK, barriers US-EU and relatively open borders UK-EU.
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Probability of no deal is still not zero, but is greatly reduced.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Kleven
Henrik Kleven
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
I don't thing that the EU on the other side of the table will play hard ball - they will rather give in, allowing for a trade arrangement.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Especially if BJ introduces bill that prevents extension beyond 2020.
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Neary
Peter Neary
Oxford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
UK policy seems focused on committing to leave hoping to get a better deal as a result. Unlikely to happen; EU has stronger bargaining power
O'Rourke
Kevin O'Rourke
Oxford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
I expect some kind of incomplete trade deal, especially on goods, because of the opposition of supporters of the government to no deal
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Expectations and demands of UK and EU 27 are strongly incompatible. But Johnson is totally unpredictable.
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Short time to negotiate increases chances of no deal and of soft Brexit. Everything in between takes time to negotiate.
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Government announced it will legislate against extension. Although it could change this, it makes no-deal more likely
-see background information here
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Clear risk of UK/EU not concluding trade agreement in 2020, even for goods only. Irony that risk reduces the more UK aligns with EU rules.
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Weder di Mauro
Beatrice Weder di Mauro
The Graduate Institute, Geneva
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Expect to hear "no deal is better than a bad deal" again. I suspect a bare-bones trade deal (zero tarrifs & quotas, no services) can be done
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Wishful silver lining? It could lead to Britain remaining de facto in the EU.
Zilibotti
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Yale University
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
I think there is likely to be a negative short term effect but in the medium and long term it is not clear what will happen.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Almost certainly would generate uncertainty and increase other transitional costs
Besley
Timothy J. Besley
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
likely adverse, size uncertain, and showing up slowly over time
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Giavazzi
Francesco Giavazzi
Bocconi
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
This is why no deal is now unlikely
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Kleven
Henrik Kleven
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
This is too complicated a case to think it through properly now.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Strongly Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
BoJo aims for Canada-style FTA w/o alignment, so services not covered. Thus, even w/ such trade agreement likely negative impact from Brexit
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Neary
Peter Neary
Oxford
Strongly Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
All professionally-respected studies show that barriers with EU will impose economic costs for which no other trade agreement can compensate
-see background information here
-see background information here
O'Rourke
Kevin O'Rourke
Oxford
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
UK depends on trade with the EU. No trade deal brings a big barrier to such trade
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
There will be a large negative effect even with a trade agreement if it doesn't cover services and the UK leaves the Single Market
-see background information here
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Most independent studies have shown large effects of no deal.
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
It's obvious that driving up trade costs with UK's neighbours will mean lower incomes, and the bigger the trade cost the more the damage
-see background information here
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Absence of trade agreement with UK's main trading partner would be a large negative supply shock at least in the short term
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Weder di Mauro
Beatrice Weder di Mauro
The Graduate Institute, Geneva
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
This (rather than failure to sort out the other issues in the WA) is the biggest chance that Brexit has a large sudden negative shock.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
WTO rules would cripple significant segments of the British economy.
Zilibotti
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Yale University
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History