Question A:

The reductions in Western programs of development assistance will have no measurable effects on GDP growth in the recipient countries over the next five years.

Responses

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
15%
2%
9%
46%
24%
4%
0%

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
17%
52%
24%
6%
0%

Question B:

The reductions in Western programs of development assistance will have substantially negative effects on the most vulnerable people in the recipient countries over the next five years.

Responses

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
15%
2%
0%
0%
4%
50%
28%

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
0%
0%
3%
51%
46%

Question C:

Development assistance motivated by the potential benefits for the donors in terms of prosperity and security is measurably more effective in promoting GDP growth in recipient countries than aid based on humanitarian or other moral principles.

Responses

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
15%
11%
2%
28%
35%
9%
0%

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
6%
44%
41%
10%
0%

Question A Participant Responses

Participant
University
Vote
Confidence
Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Varies significantly across countries and difficult to say in any case.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
one would have to know much more about the various programs that have been stopped. But, if not about growth, probably about diseases, mortality...
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
I may have marked disagree but by mistake - please take me as agree
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Ending development aid does have an effect on GDP both directly, as the dollar spent are reduced, and indirectly, as the role played by programs for education and government efficiency for growth are reduced as well.
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
There is evidence that foreign aid can have a positive impact on economic growth and hence reductions would likely have negative effect. Evidence is not entirely conclusive (due to selection issues) and depends on recipient country institutions and the type of aid.
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The association between aid and GDP growth is weak in the data,
-see background information here
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Perhaps, more effect on poverty assistance than on growth of recipient countries.
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
short-term might be negative. long-term probably positive
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant
University
Vote
Confidence
Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
The former recipients of health care aid such as vaccines and HIV drugs will unfortunately suffer significantly.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
based on limited knowledge, it looks bad for some vulnerable groups.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Unless we believe that development money is spent in a completely inefficient way, the negative effect on vulnerable people is what we have to expect.
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Whenever foreign aid is effective at directing funds to those most in need, this statement should be true.
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Especially in disaster relief, but not only. There can be large welfare gains in providing social insurance, beyond GDP effects.
-see background information here
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant
University
Vote
Confidence
Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
This is a difficult one to judge with many different factors at play.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Any assistance benefit donors in a sense.
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
If the statement is really about "benefits for the donors" in terms of their own prosperity, this is an amazingly stupid statement.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
London Business School
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Aid-growth literature would suggest the opposite
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History