Question A:

The cancellation of the majority of programs run by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) will have no measurable effects on GDP growth in the recipient countries over the next five years.

Responses

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
11%
0%
9%
24%
46%
11%
0%

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
14%
35%
41%
10%
0%

Question B:

The cancellation of the majority of USAID programs will have substantially negative effects on the most vulnerable people in the recipient countries over the next five years.

Responses

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
11%
0%
0%
0%
2%
50%
37%

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
0%
0%
1%
47%
52%

Question C:

Development assistance motivated by the potential benefits for the donors in terms of prosperity and security is measurably more effective in promoting GDP growth in recipient countries than aid based on humanitarian or other moral principles.

Responses

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
11%
11%
2%
28%
48%
0%
0%

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
1%
40%
59%
0%
0%

Question A Participant Responses

Participant
University
Vote
Confidence
Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
The evidence for a long run negative effect of aid on growth is weak, but the abrupt elimination of aid will have a small negative effect in the short term.
-see background information here
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
I suspect that the effect will be negative. I'm uncertain if it will be large enough to be measurable. In any case, we won't have a research design that can actually measure it. There are many "common shocks" hitting many countries at this moment in time.
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
It might make receiver countries less stable, which ultimately hurts GDP growth as well.
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Amounts are small but question is misguided bc GDP misses health and other determinants of welfare. Plus, it is possible that there are GDP effects if aid prevents consumption disasters, civil war etc....
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Many USAID programs, such as PEPFAR, do not aim to directly improve economic growth.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Strongly Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
USAID was tiny compared to the economies involved, and so the effects of its cancellation may be difficult to detect.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Certainly for countries such as South Sudan, Somalia or DRC where USAID financing represented multiple percentage points of GNI.
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Didn't know any of the numbers here, so I looked up one country off the top of my head, Liberia. Received about $150m in U.S. aid in 2023. GDP that year was $4.24B, so aid was 3.5%. Loosing that seems enough to measurably affect growth.
-see background information here
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
It is very difficult to estimate the casual effect of USAID on country level growth. But the immediate macro effects will be negative, and the long term consequences likely to be significant.
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant
University
Vote
Confidence
Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Humanitarian aid, health related aid matters and disaster relief matter. I uncertain, though, about whether USAID is large enough to have a "substantial" effect.
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
We see this happening in Myanmar already. And this is just one tiny manifestation of the harm that the U.S. (and, specifically, the world's richest man) has chosen to inflict on the world's most vulnerable populations.
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Global health aid!
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
The sudden cancellation of programs like PEPFAR will lead to a decline in health care. Even if host countries replace the programs, that will take time particularly without the help of the USAID people who have the expertise the host needs.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
USAID was targeted at the most vulnerable, who have little other recourse.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Notably ending programs like PEPFAR
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
See analysis for prior question.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
There is strong evidence that many specific USAID programs in health, education, and social protection are highly effective, and that their withdrawal will have have string negative effects on the well-being of the poor. .
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant
University
Vote
Confidence
Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
I don't even understand the question. What is the tension between prosperity and security vs. humanitarian and other moral principles?
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Humanitarian is often about prosperity and security. Plus GDP is not welfare (see PEPFAR).
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Foreign aid is often not given to improve economic growth. For example, military aid to Egypt is justified by other objectives.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
The most successful programs such as for global health have both rationales
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
It is difficult to say what the effect of aid, motivated by security benefits to donors, will have on recipients.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Too much elasticity of meaning in those words to say anything definitive.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
A contender for most poorly worded question in recent history
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
I don't know of any convincing evidence of this.
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History