Sustained tax and spending policies that boost consumption in ways that reduce the saving rate are likely to lower long-run living standards.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
LONG run and sustained...
|
||||
Janet Currie |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
It depends what the spending is for.
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Boosting the short run implies a tradeoff, and a distortion in market incentives for long run efficient savings.
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
lower long run savings is likely to lower long run living standards regardless of source. likely, not certain.
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
I would give a different answer depending on whether we were talking about Brazil or China.
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Claudia Goldin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
Important question with an answer that depends on too many factors for a flippant response on my part.
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
if we are talking long-run
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Only an unlikely exotic economy could over come the basic principle that more now means less later.
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Artificial depression of saving, which is the (unintentional) effect of many govt policies, reduces welfare unless itoffsets some distortion
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Not everywhere and always, but probably here and now for most such policies.
-see background information here |
||||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Poorly worded and loaded question.
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hyun Song Shin |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
Unclear what is meant by a "spending policy that boosts consumption."
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Luigi Zingales |
Chicago Booth | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|