Sustained tax and spending policies that boost consumption in ways that reduce the saving rate are likely to lower long-run living standards.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
| Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
![]() Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
![]() Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
LONG run and sustained...
|
||||
![]() Janet Currie |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
It depends what the spending is for.
|
||||
![]() Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Boosting the short run implies a tradeoff, and a distortion in market incentives for long run efficient savings.
|
||||
![]() Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
lower long run savings is likely to lower long run living standards regardless of source. likely, not certain.
|
||||
![]() Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
I would give a different answer depending on whether we were talking about Brazil or China.
|
||||
![]() Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Claudia Goldin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Important question with an answer that depends on too many factors for a flippant response on my part.
|
||||
![]() Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
if we are talking long-run
|
||||
![]() Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
|
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Only an unlikely exotic economy could over come the basic principle that more now means less later.
|
||||
![]() Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Artificial depression of saving, which is the (unintentional) effect of many govt policies, reduces welfare unless itoffsets some distortion
|
||||
![]() Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Not everywhere and always, but probably here and now for most such policies.
-see background information here |
||||
![]() Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Poorly worded and loaded question.
|
||||
![]() Maurice Obstfeld |
Peterson Institute for International Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
![]() Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Hyun Song Shin |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Unclear what is meant by a "spending policy that boosts consumption."
|
||||
![]() Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
![]() Luigi Zingales |
Chicago Booth | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||





































