US

Enforcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Question A:

The president has signed an executive order that pauses enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Permanently ending US enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act will substantially increase global levels of bribery and corruption.

Responses

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
7%
13%
0%
2%
13%
41%
24%

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
0%
3%
14%
44%
39%

Question B:

Permanently ending US enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act will substantially improve US businesses' long-term profits and long-term competitiveness.

Responses

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
7%
13%
9%
26%
46%
0%
0%

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
15%
39%
47%
0%
0%

Question A Participant Responses

Participant
University
Vote
Confidence
Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The U.S. is a norm-setter for the democratic world. The new message is: corruption is how we will all do business.
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
If bribery of foreign officials is legalized, it's natural to predict more use of bribery as a business tool.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
This is not least the case because other countries may be inclined to follow suit.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
This is not a question that most economists could answer with expertise. Those who have the expertise should answer. Those who would just be pontificating should refrain.
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The US should encourage honest business practices, not turn a blind eye to corruption.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Strongly Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
It would increase, but nor certain about "substantial"
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
I don't know how one way or the other if FCPA was successful at shifting the equilibrium. Maybe it was and this will cause a big change; I just don't know the evidence.
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Existing empirical work is not that strong, but there is evidence that FCPA reduces bribery in third countries by US and (crucially) foreign firms that do business in the USA.
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant
University
Vote
Confidence
Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
The main problem for United States in the next four years is likely to be the collapse of its institutions and its own increasing corruption problem, starting from the very top. This would be one more step to enshrine a corruption culture in the United States.
Aguiar
Mark Aguiar
Princeton
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
I know of no evidence on this question. But if corruption raises profitability, I'm not sure that these are 'normal economic profits' or simply rents. And if they're rents, ending FCPA encourages rent-seeking. Rents are not by definition harmful, but rent-seeking surely is
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Bergemann
Dirk Bergemann
Yale
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Increased relative US competitiveness, yes. Increased long-term profitability depends on whether degrading the rule of law causes efficiency losses to trump relative US competitiveness.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Strongly Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Glaeser
Edward Glaeser
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
This is unclear for the same reason: Other countries may follow suit, leveling the playing field. At the same time the world will be worse off.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
This is not a question that most economists could answer with expertise. Those who have the expertise should answer. Those who would just be pontificating should refrain.
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Hurst
Erik Hurst
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Depends a lot on what other countries do. A race to the bottom where everyone is paying bribes is bad for everyone.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Strongly Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Presumably, other countries will respond by relaxing their constraints on bribery. So, the overall effect may be to reduce US firms' profits.
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Pathak
Parag Pathak
MIT
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Opening the doors to bribery and corruption will allow some people to enrich themselves, but there is little reason to think these gains will be channeled into profits or increased competitiveness.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
It would facilitate US activities in countries with corrupt officials, but honest officials may fear the effect on their reputation of dealing with a US firm.
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Scott Morton
Fiona Scott Morton
Yale
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Stantcheva
Stefanie Stantcheva
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Syverson
Chad Syverson
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
First, it depends on who is in the market. FCPA is used against non-US firms as well, and can lower equilibrium corruption. Second, do we really want to rely on corruption to gain advantage if indeed it does provide any?
Werning
Ivan Werning
MIT
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History