Question A:
Subsidizing renewable energy sources is better than taxing fossil fuels, assuming the subsidy or tax would be set at levels that would reduce carbon emissions by an equivalent amount.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question B:
Germany’s solar-energy subsidies to date have produced net social benefits for Germany.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question C:
Solar-energy subsidies to date in Germany and other countries have produced net social benefits for the world.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question A Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Philippe Aghion |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Franklin Allen |
Imperial College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
There seem to be strong learning by doing effects. Subsidies can help target these where these effects are largest.
|
||||
Pol Antras |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Timothy J. Besley |
LSE | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Olivier Blanchard |
Peterson Institute | Bio/Vote History | ||
First pass: Fight a distortion, don't create a second one.
|
||||
Nicholas Bloom |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard William Blundell |
University College London | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré |
Paris School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
Subsidies need to be financed through taxing other tax bases, with new distortions. Better to stick with the polluter-payer principle.
|
||||
Elena Carletti |
Bocconi | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jean-Pierre Danthine |
Paris School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Paul De Grauwe |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jan Eeckhout |
UPF Barcelona | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ernst Fehr |
Universität Zurich | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Xavier Freixas |
Barcelona GSE | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln |
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jordi Galí |
Barcelona GSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Luis Garicano |
LSE | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Francesco Giavazzi |
Bocconi | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Rachel Griffith |
University of Manchester | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Veronica Guerrieri |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Luigi Guiso |
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Martin Hellwig |
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods | Bio/Vote History | ||
Subsidizing renewable energy may induce innovation through learning by doing. Taxing carbon may just induce cross-border substitution.
|
||||
Patrick Honohan |
Trinity College Dublin | Bio/Vote History | ||
Better potential for double dividend.
|
||||
Henrik Kleven |
Princeton | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jan Pieter Krahnen |
Goethe University Frankfurt | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Per Krusell |
Stockholm University | Bio/Vote History | ||
A tax is a more direct instrument for reducing emissions - the main goal - and R&D subsidies are at best an imperfect substitute.
|
||||
Botond Kőszegi |
Central European University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eliana La Ferrara |
Harvard Kennedy | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christian Leuz |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
CO2 tax better than either one; Subs require govmnt to pick energy source & hard to justify unless spur innovation w/ large spillovers.
|
||||
Costas Meghir |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Peter Neary |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Given revenue neutrality, choosing between the policies hinges on uncertainty (which renewables?) & on macro considerations: stimulus better
|
||||
Kevin O'Rourke |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marco Pagano |
Università di Napoli Federico II | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Lubos Pastor |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Torsten Persson |
Stockholm University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christopher Pissarides |
London School of Economics and Political Science | Bio/Vote History | ||
Tax plus subsidy acts on two fronts
|
||||
Richard Portes |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
Budget constraint
|
||||
Canice Prendergast |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Lucrezia Reichlin |
London Business School | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Rafael Repullo |
CEMFI | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hélène Rey |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
Pollution needs to be taxed. Governments need revenues.
|
||||
Antoinette Schoar |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
John Van Reenen |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
Carbon taxes can be very effective in steering technical change & doesn't require so direction http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1178.pdf
|
||||
John Vickers |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Activities that generate negative externalities need direct discouragement
|
||||
Hans-Joachim Voth |
University of Zurich | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Beatrice Weder di Mauro |
The Graduate Institute, Geneva | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Karl Whelan |
University College Dublin | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Charles Wyplosz |
The Graduate Institute Geneva | Bio/Vote History | ||
These are equivalent measures, except that the first one raises the tax burden while the second one reduces it ceteris paribus.
|
||||
Fabrizio Zilibotti |
Yale University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Question B Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Philippe Aghion |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Franklin Allen |
Imperial College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
The quicker we get up the learning curve for these technologies the better.
|
||||
Pol Antras |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Timothy J. Besley |
LSE | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Olivier Blanchard |
Peterson Institute | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nicholas Bloom |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard William Blundell |
University College London | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré |
Paris School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
Quite inefficient policy. Coal plants are still alive. Cost passed on households.
|
||||
Elena Carletti |
Bocconi | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jean-Pierre Danthine |
Paris School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Paul De Grauwe |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jan Eeckhout |
UPF Barcelona | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ernst Fehr |
Universität Zurich | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Xavier Freixas |
Barcelona GSE | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln |
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jordi Galí |
Barcelona GSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Luis Garicano |
LSE | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Francesco Giavazzi |
Bocconi | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Rachel Griffith |
University of Manchester | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Veronica Guerrieri |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Luigi Guiso |
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Martin Hellwig |
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods | Bio/Vote History | ||
We all feel so good about them!!! :-) A serious answer to the question is hardly possible.
|
||||
Patrick Honohan |
Trinity College Dublin | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Henrik Kleven |
Princeton | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jan Pieter Krahnen |
Goethe University Frankfurt | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Per Krusell |
Stockholm University | Bio/Vote History | ||
My understanding is that they have been very costly and not paid back for Germany.
|
||||
Botond Kőszegi |
Central European University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eliana La Ferrara |
Harvard Kennedy | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christian Leuz |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Wide range of estimates&benefits abroad; FiT&output sub often expensive; wind did better. Maybe offsetting benefits w/ energy independence
-see background information here -see background information here |
||||
Costas Meghir |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Peter Neary |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
These policies are a global public good: clear net benefits for the world (emissions fall) but not necessarily for Germany
|
||||
Kevin O'Rourke |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marco Pagano |
Università di Napoli Federico II | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Lubos Pastor |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Torsten Persson |
Stockholm University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christopher Pissarides |
London School of Economics and Political Science | Bio/Vote History | ||
I don't know enough about them to judge
|
||||
Richard Portes |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
Germany has fiscal space.
|
||||
Canice Prendergast |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Lucrezia Reichlin |
London Business School | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Rafael Repullo |
CEMFI | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hélène Rey |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
German energy policy relies far too much on coal. Needs meaningful carbon price.
|
||||
Antoinette Schoar |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
John Van Reenen |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
John Vickers |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
They look a high-cost way to get the benefits, many of which are non-German. Hard to judge the net effect.
|
||||
Hans-Joachim Voth |
University of Zurich | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Beatrice Weder di Mauro |
The Graduate Institute, Geneva | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Karl Whelan |
University College Dublin | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Charles Wyplosz |
The Graduate Institute Geneva | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Fabrizio Zilibotti |
Yale University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Question C Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Philippe Aghion |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Franklin Allen |
Imperial College London | Bio/Vote History | ||
Not so clear solar-power is the best alternative for Germany. I am afraid I don't know enough about the technologies and Germany's climate.
|
||||
Pol Antras |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Timothy J. Besley |
LSE | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Olivier Blanchard |
Peterson Institute | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nicholas Bloom |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard William Blundell |
University College London | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré |
Paris School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
The problem is less solar-energy subsidies than the phasing out of nuclear power.
|
||||
Elena Carletti |
Bocconi | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jean-Pierre Danthine |
Paris School of Economics | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Paul De Grauwe |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jan Eeckhout |
UPF Barcelona | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ernst Fehr |
Universität Zurich | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Xavier Freixas |
Barcelona GSE | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln |
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jordi Galí |
Barcelona GSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Luis Garicano |
LSE | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Francesco Giavazzi |
Bocconi | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Rachel Griffith |
University of Manchester | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Veronica Guerrieri |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Luigi Guiso |
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Martin Hellwig |
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods | Bio/Vote History | ||
China is exporting lots of solar panels!
|
||||
Patrick Honohan |
Trinity College Dublin | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Henrik Kleven |
Princeton | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jan Pieter Krahnen |
Goethe University Frankfurt | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Per Krusell |
Stockholm University | Bio/Vote History | ||
The R&D has had benefits and the point is that they are global, not German-specific. I have not seen any cost-benefit analysis though.
|
||||
Botond Kőszegi |
Central European University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eliana La Ferrara |
Harvard Kennedy | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christian Leuz |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Subs spurred tech dev & adoption that w’d not have occurred as quickly; also evidence of tech spillovers but size unclear yet crucial to Q.
-see background information here |
||||
Costas Meghir |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Peter Neary |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Definitely positive, though clearly not necessarily very large relative to the scale of global emissions
|
||||
Kevin O'Rourke |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marco Pagano |
Università di Napoli Federico II | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Lubos Pastor |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Torsten Persson |
Stockholm University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christopher Pissarides |
London School of Economics and Political Science | Bio/Vote History | ||
They have reduced carbon emissions
|
||||
Richard Portes |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Canice Prendergast |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Lucrezia Reichlin |
London Business School | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Rafael Repullo |
CEMFI | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hélène Rey |
London Business School | Bio/Vote History | ||
Positive externality of more solar energy adoption
|
||||
Antoinette Schoar |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
John Van Reenen |
LSE | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
John Vickers |
Oxford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Again they look a high-cost way of doing it, even allowing for dynamic cost-reduction effects on solar power.
|
||||
Hans-Joachim Voth |
University of Zurich | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Beatrice Weder di Mauro |
The Graduate Institute, Geneva | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Karl Whelan |
University College Dublin | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Charles Wyplosz |
The Graduate Institute Geneva | Bio/Vote History | ||
The rest of the world stands to benefit from less toxic emissions in Germany at German taxpayer's expense.
|
||||
Fabrizio Zilibotti |
Yale University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|