Question A:
The current $7,500 tax credit for purchasing electric vehicles is regressive.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question B:
To encourage greater take-up of electric vehicles, public expenditure on infrastructure to support them (such as charging stations) is likely to be more cost-effective than providing equivalent amounts as tax credits/purchase rebates for buyers.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question A Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
But this is misleading. Climate change is an existential emergency and its effects are larger on the poor. Need to use ALL policy options!
-see background information here |
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
EVs are high-status luxury goods bought by affluent households. The tax credit is akin to subsidizing high-efficiency jacuzzis
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
Would prefer a comparison to an explicit alternative.
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Getting $7500 off on a $65,000 car is probably not subsidizing low-income households.
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
As to billionaire vs. millionaire, it is progressive, but as to poor vs. millionaire regressive.
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
agreed but this is static view (e.g., current EV prices) if credits lower costs, then over longer run policy might not be regressive
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Electric cars are luxury goods
|
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
The credit itself is regressive but the benefits that it generates are more evenly shared.
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Lower income households can't afford most of the electric cars.
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Looking only at fiscal side, not benefits.
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
Poor design of the existing tax credit points to redesigning it, not eliminating it.
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
James Stock |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Question B Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Yes, but again I object to the "either or" framing. Given the emergency, we need to do both and many other things, many much more radical.
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Unlikely that this this solves regressiveness problem by spurring low income HHs to buy EVs. But might encourage somewhat broader adoption.
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
The cited paper suggests "agree", though there is some uncertainty given the paper is a different time and context.
-see background information here |
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
It isn’t cheap
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
confused ?. are network externalities > learning by doing spillovers ? what is goal 4 cost-effective? but do need common stds 4 charging
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Lack of charging stations is a major problem. Network externalities make a better case for subsidies.
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Network externalities are key.
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
Especially with gasoline prices where they are.
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Effective infrastructure will be critical in moving to electric vehicles as the norm.
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
The evidence, such as it is, seems to point in this direction, but hard to be confident. Grid upgrades needed for mass high-speed charging.
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
James Stock |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Helping with “range anxiety” might allow other manufacturers to compete with Tesla’s array of superchargers.
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|