Economics and Elections

Question A:

A period of high inflation is substantially more electorally damaging to incumbent governments in advanced countries than a period of high unemployment.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Voters are more likely to punish incumbents for what they perceive as poor national economic performance than they are to reward incumbents for a good economy.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Apart from the pandemic, it's a while since most countries have had high unemployment. The pandemic was rather different because of the many measures governments took to offset its effects. We will see next time we have severe unemployment.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Far from my expertise. Both would be damaging, I am sure. We have recent evidence for the negative impact of inflation.
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
clearly true this time. but, as an eternal truth, not obvious.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
I would not generalize. In my view this clearly depends on circumstances
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
no evidence this is the case
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
Sciences Po
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Partly because high unemployment usually concentrated among those less likely to vote. Okun's misery index might not be too far off, though, as a quantitative measure of the trade-off in the median household's mind.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Without "hard" evidence at hand, I can merely speculate. Here I do: It seems reasonable to me that observing soaring unemployment figures appears to be more tangible, more noticeable, than higher prices everywhere. As always, things depend on relative magnitudes...
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
It might as more people are affected by inflation than by unemployment. But the answer is unclear because, at least for the US, there is evidence that these two issues have different effects by party affiliation and hence the answer could depend on incumbent government.
-see background information here
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
The impacts of inflation are felt directly by almost everyone. The effects of unemployment, while leading to a pessimistic view of growth are directly felt by a relatively small group of people
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
See Stantcheva et al
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
It depends on what is "high" on both. But, the last three years of US data teaches us little about this, since there was almost no increase in unemployment. If inflation had peaked at 6% but unemployment had risen above 6%, wouldn't Harris have lost by even more?
-see background information here
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
I think this certainly true now. Many people had forgotten what high inflation was like and found the experience upsetting. In previous times, when the public was more used to steady inflation, high unemployment rates were more politically salient.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
That's what we say after a period of inflation. We'd say the opposite of high unemployment.

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
There are not that many democracies that have had good economic performance recently. The US yes but very few European countries have done well recently. In Asia South Korea has been doing well but Japan not very well. So again difficult to say. The US seems a special case.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Again, far from my expertise, but it is likely that such an asymmetry exists.
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Sounds plausible. But I have not seen any estimate of this asymmetry.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Again circumstances are important but it is easier for opponents to capitalize on bad news than for incumbents to promote good ones
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
This is an application of Kahneman & Tversky's Prospect Theory
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
Sciences Po
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
But voting is also about much more.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
I tend to agree for reasons borrowing from prospect theory. Losses and gains of equal magnitude are translated into "utils" of different magnitude, the former being larger than the latter, in absolute terms.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
The Q of how much economic performance influences voting is subject to much research. Not sure there is a consensus, let alone evidence on asymmetric responses. The evidence also depends on country development and the strength of voter identification with the parties. See below.
-see background information here
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Good performance is expected and considered the baseline. Bad performance is attributed to policies
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
"A strong economy favors the incumbent" is not the whole story. According to my JPE 2020 paper w Veronesi, "a strong economy favors Republicans, a weak economy favors Democrats." Our model predicted a Trump win in 2024, Biden win in 2020, Trump win in 2016, and more.
-see background information here
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Loss aversion and reference dependence would suggest this, but I do not know of direct evidence for it in the election/macroeconomy context
-see background information here
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
I think this depends on the circumstances. Currently, there is a strong desire to blame incumbents in their country for the high inflation that occurred despite it being a global phenomenon. But incumbents have often won in the past when the economy was doing well.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
It makes sense, superficially, for voters to expect policymakers to deliver good conditions. Except that the shock might be exogenous.