Because all federal spending and taxes must be approved by both houses of Congress and the executive branch, a separate debt ceiling that has to be increased periodically creates unneeded uncertainty and can potentially lead to worse fiscal outcomes.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
The question contains its own answer.
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Janet Currie |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
It does indeed provide some brake on long-term spending, but there has to be a better way.
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
This is a second chance to gridlock. A budget passed by Congress already authorizes the necessary funding.
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Claudia Goldin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
OBVIOUSly
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
This is a question about the behavior of members of Congress. I don't see how an economist could have any expertise on this.
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
In the past, it was not acceptable for legislators to create the disruption from blocking a debt increase. Even RR disapproved.
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Deciding whether or not to pay the debts incurred to fund the previously approved tax and spending is nuts.
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
It sure looks like it's been adding uncertainty lately (e.g. 2011). But it could conceivably be a force for good.
-see background information here -see background information here |
||||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Might not have given the same answer two years ago, but at this point, seems hard to disagree.
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Just read the paper.
|
||||
Hyun Song Shin |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
The debt ceiling is a dumb idea with no benefits and potentially catestrophic costs if ever used.
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Luigi Zingales |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
It can also lead to potential better outcomes
|