Cryptocurrency

Question A:

A bitcoin's value derives from the belief that others will want to use it, which implies that its purchasing power is likely to fluctuate over time to a degree that will limit its usefulness.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

A substantial source of the value of unbacked decentralized private cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, arises from their convenience for use in illegal activities.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

A properly diversified portfolio should include crypto assets.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Its value is liquidity, like unbacked money. Positive price, no dividend. That means eventually it must earn zero expected return, and likely decline in value once "liquidity" (anonymity!) substitutes emerge. Volatility? Fiat money can have low volatility and low return.
Cornelli
Francesca Cornelli
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
These fluctuations and the costs of transacting will prevent bitcoin from being much of a means of payment.
Du
Wenxin Du
HBS
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Eberly
Janice Eberly
Northwestern Kellogg
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Fama
Eugene Fama
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
High volatility is already a fact of life for bitcoin.
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bitcoin is about five times more volatile than gold. Currently, it is a risky store of value which is different from the founder's vision of a payments mechanism. High volatility was originally blamed on illiquidity. However, even with more liquidity - it is still very volatile.
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Bitcoin does depend on the beliefs of others. However, those beliefs can persist for a long time. Wampum -- made from shells of little value -- was the currency in New York for almost 100 years.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
It is already trading like a speculative asset and no reason why that will cease.
Koijen
Ralph Koijen
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Lo
Andrew Lo
MIT Sloan
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
It's obvious that, without any useful physical asset underlying bitcoin or any utility associated with it, it's value is derived strictly from the interest that buyers have in acquiring them.
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Matvos
Gregor Matvos
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bitcoin's value derives both from speculation/gambling, like a meme stock, and from the expectation of future demand for it in transactions. But fluctuations in value will undermine the second use because there is no supply mechanism (like the Fed) to stabilize its value.
-see background information here
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
As a non-dividend paying asset, the primary source of value is resale. Other experiments such as lightning are a potential source of use value,
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Northwestern Kellogg
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
No intrinsic value, actually uses valuable energy resources, value could be disrupted by quantum computing
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bitcoin is not very efficient for legal transactions. Not all "illegal" is bad. Do we want to enforce China, Venezuela currency controls? Enforce every single US law? (Starve the undocumented?) Lose all anonymity in transactions? Crypto needs an enlightened and difficult balance.
Cornelli
Francesca Cornelli
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Du
Wenxin Du
HBS
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Yes, this a "substantial" part of the value, but probably not the major part of the value.
Eberly
Janice Eberly
Northwestern Kellogg
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Being outside the regulated payments network is most valuable for entities that want to avoid scrutiny. This creates demand, there are multiple such payment cryptos, so it need not dampen volatility.
Fama
Eugene Fama
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The centralized stablecoin tether is widely used. Tether is essentially an unregulated bank. Tether has more daily trading volume than BTC+ETH - most for trading, however, a portion for illegal transactions. BTC and monero are used for ransomware.
-see background information here
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
See also Eric Budish's fantastic primer on the issues with Bitcoin specifically
-see background information here
Koijen
Ralph Koijen
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Lo
Andrew Lo
MIT Sloan
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Empirical evidence
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Increased oversight of Bitcoin has decreased the extent to which Bitcoin is used for illegal activity. Illegal activity is more of an issue in smaller cryptocurrencies.
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
I have not seen detailed studies of how much value arises from this feature
Matvos
Gregor Matvos
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
It is not clear how much illegal activity uses this form of payment so it is hard to know whether this is a significant part of its value.
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are the means of payment for ransoms, much cybercrime, and a lot of gains are never reported to tax authorities.
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Eth value partially derives from being a platform token. The pseudo-anonymous nature of most chains means illegal transactions can be tracked.
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Northwestern Kellogg
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Best use case is illicit transactions: weapons, drugs, online scams
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Unbacked crypto only has value for "liquidity" or convenience yield reasons. Long run legal investors have no need for that. Otherwise, pure zero-sum speculation. Invest if you're smarter than average. And half are deluded.
Cornelli
Francesca Cornelli
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Du
Wenxin Du
HBS
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Eberly
Janice Eberly
Northwestern Kellogg
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
An underlying claim to payment service provision could be a portfolio asset, but a bet just adds noise. Actual crypto service provision is likely negligible in a global market portfolio.
Fama
Eugene Fama
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
The weight on crypto, if not 0, should probably be negative, which leads to a huge downside risk.
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
The token complex is approximately $2 trillion and hard to ignore any more. ETFs make it easy to invest. There are hundreds of companies in this space that would qualify - but almost all are private and only available to accredited investors.
-see background information here
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Koijen
Ralph Koijen
Chicago Booth
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
the allocation can be very small depending on one's beliefs about the long-run valuation of crypto currencies (and your confidence in those views)
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Lo
Andrew Lo
MIT Sloan
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Due to the volatility of all crypto assets, they are not useful "stores of value"
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Crypto "can" be part of a well-diversified portfolio, but I don't think it necessarily "should" be. It is not clear what the source of value is for crypto
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
The market portfolio clearly includes these assets, since they exists and are traded
Matvos
Gregor Matvos
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Agree, but would be very small.
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
If crypto has transaction benefits, the expected return will be low due to convenience yield, making it unsuitable for a long-term investor's portfolio; if crypto is like a commodity, there does not seem to be a good economic rationale to expect a positive risk premium.
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Mainly disagree: Currencies are for transactions, so the return on money-like assets is dominated by other assets (and selling them is profitable!). But there is an argument for holding 0.2%ish of portfolio in coins like "socks" whose payoff is their future transaction value.
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Northwestern Kellogg
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Strongly Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Too volatile, non-trivial chance of large negative return, BUT low correlation with other asset classes
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History