Crypto Holdings by US Public Authorities

Question A:

Central banks' international reserves portfolios would have substantially lower risk if they were to hold a substantial portion of their reserves in crypto assets.

Responses

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
13%
0%
56%
23%
8%
0%
0%

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
74%
18%
8%
0%
0%

Question B:

The US economy would benefit substantially by borrowing money to form a strategic crypto asset reserve fund.

Responses

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
13%
0%
56%
21%
8%
0%
3%

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
74%
18%
4%
0%
4%

Question A Participant Responses

Participant
University
Vote
Confidence
Bio/Vote History
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Crypto is an extremely volatile asset class and there is no evidence that crypto hedges other financial risks.
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
It all depends... US EU CB hold few foreign assets, so you must be talking about small countries. Well-backed dollar stable coins could be sanction-proof dollars, not a terrible idea. Unbacked bitcoin, dogecoin, fartcoin, trump coin would be a terrible idea.
Cornelli
Francesca Cornelli
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Du
Wenxin Du
HBS
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Central bank reserves portfolios are dominated by safe bonds denominated in dollars and similarly stable liquid securities. Other than some stablecoins and tokenized safe bonds, which are not under consideration for this purpose, crypto assets are substantially more risky.
Eberly
Janice Eberly
Northwestern Kellogg
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Fama
Eugene Fama
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Cryptoassets have volatilities in the range of 60-100% annualized - the stock market is about 15%. It is hard to imagine that substantial holdings would reduce risk. Of course, volatility is not a complete description of risk. Cryptoassets may reduce other types of risk.
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Koijen
Ralph Koijen
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Lo
Andrew Lo
MIT Sloan
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
You're kidding right? Have you computed the volatility of bitcoin lately??
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Matvos
Gregor Matvos
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
adding a small amount would likely reduce risk (as the correlation with other assets in the reserves portfolio is likely low) but adding substantial amount would raise risk, given the high volatility of crypto currencies (other than stablecoins)
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Crypto pays no interest, has little practical use beyond speculation, has a price that is very volatile, and has little liquidity and market depth, making it a poor reserve asset along nearly every dimension.
-see background information here
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Hoover Institution Stanford
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Strongly Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Strongly Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
crypto assets are inherently worthless. Central Banks should stay far away.
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Strongly Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant
University
Vote
Confidence
Bio/Vote History
Campbell
John Campbell
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Cochrane
John Cochrane
Hoover Institution Stanford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Again, pretty vague. If US borrows to invest in a treasury backed dollar stablecoin, what's the point? Borrowing more to "invest" in bitcoin is about the worst idea I've heard. And it will end up in Trump coin or similar. Supply of unbacked money is elastic. NOTE: Respondent meant to answer "Strongly Disagree" to this question.
Cornelli
Francesca Cornelli
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Diamond
Douglas Diamond
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Du
Wenxin Du
HBS
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Adding to the national debt is costly. I don't see a sufficiently offsetting benefit to stockpiling crypto assets, which have limited strategic or real-economy applications.
Eberly
Janice Eberly
Northwestern Kellogg
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Fama
Eugene Fama
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Gabaix
Xavier Gabaix
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Goldstein
Itay Goldstein
UPenn Wharton
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Graham
John Graham
Duke Fuqua
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey
Duke Fuqua
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
I would oppose this even the word "crypto" was omitted. The US not in a position with $34t of debt to borrow more for some SWF. That said, the US might consider holding rather than selling all the seized crypto, e.g., Bitfinex, Silk Road, etc. This does not involve borrowing.
Hong
Harrison Hong
Columbia Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Jiang
Wei Jiang
Emory Goizueta
Disagree
2
Bio/Vote History
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
See the great parody by Owen Lamont, priceless
-see background information here
Koijen
Ralph Koijen
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Kuhnen
Camelia Kuhnen
UNC Kenan-Flagler
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Lo
Andrew Lo
MIT Sloan
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
This can't possibly be a serious question.
Lowry
Michelle Lowry
Drexel LeBow
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Ludvigson
Sydney Ludvigson
NYU
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Maggiori
Matteo Maggiori
Stanford GSB
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
This would strike me as one of the worst policy ideas ever.
Matvos
Gregor Matvos
Northwestern Kellogg Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Moskowitz
Tobias Moskowitz
Yale School of Management
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Nagel
Stefan Nagel
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
There is no reason why economic benefits should be generated if the government were to, effectively, run a crypto hedge fund
Parker
Jonathan Parker
MIT Sloan
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
The United States has a debt of over 100% of GDP. If it has extra money to invest, it should buy Treasury debt and reduce our national debt, not invest is a non-interest bearing, costly to transfer, public ledger entries.
Parlour
Christine Parlour
Berkeley Haas
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Philippon
Thomas Philippon
NYU Stern
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Puri
Manju Puri
Duke Fuqua
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Roberts
Michael R. Roberts
UPenn Wharton
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Sapienza
Paola Sapienza
Hoover Institution Stanford
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Seru
Amit Seru
Stanford GSB
Strongly Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Stambaugh
Robert Stambaugh
UPenn Wharton
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Starks
Laura Starks
UT Austin McCombs Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Stein
Jeremy Stein
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Stroebel
Johannes Stroebel
NYU Stern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Titman
Sheridan Titman
UT Austin McCombs
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Columbia Business School
Strongly Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Whited
Toni Whited
UMich Ross School
Strongly Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History