In general, using more congestion charges in crowded transportation networks — such as higher tolls during peak travel times in cities, and peak fees for airplane takeoff and landing slots — and using the proceeds to lower other taxes would make citizens on average better off.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
| Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
See "The High Cost of Free Parking" by Donald Shoup
-see background information here |
||||
 Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
In general, the theory for pricing of congestion externalities would be analogous to pricing other externalities.
|
||||
 Janet Currie |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Congestion creates many externalities, including the health costs of pollution.
|
||||
 David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Not all citizens ate better off. Huge geographic disparities.
|
||||
 Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Pricing at marginal value has benefits. A simple version of this is known as the first welfare theorem. The proposal goes toward this.
|
||||
 Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
 Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Claudia Goldin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Prices allocate goods more efficiently to consumers.
|
||||
 Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
but be careful about things with large compliance costs as a share of revenue. Waiting 15 mins to pay 20 cent toll is very dumb
|
||||
 Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Congestion is a pure waste of resources, so eliminating it leaves lots of scope for improving standards of living
|
||||
 Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Empirical evidence supports it. And theoretically it also makes sense.
|
||||
 Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Yes, so long as congestion taxes are based on the TRUE social costs of congestion and really reduce other taxes. Let prices allocate demand
|
||||
 Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
 Edward Lazear |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
The failure to price things like time results in overuse. Pricing has already proven to be effective in applicable situations, revenue aside
|
||||
 Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
There is a strong efficiency case but there still could be distributional consequences for some.
|
||||
 Cecilia Rouse |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Potentially but it would depend on the magnitude of the disutility associated with congestion for those with lower elasticities of demand.
|
||||
 Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 Hyun Song Shin |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
 James Stock |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
|
||||
 Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
The only hard part is using the revenue in a reasonable way.
|
||||
 Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Of course the use of the tax revenue is key. Question: why do no GOP candidates favor such policies? Answer: more anti tax than pro market
|
||||
 Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Congestion fees can serve well to match private costs with social costs, as long as they are implemented with minimal transaction costs.
|
||||
 Luigi Zingales |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
|
||||
