The “Cadillac tax” on expensive employer-provided health insurance plans will reduce costly distortions in US health care if it is allowed to take effect as scheduled in 2018.
Responses
© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
19%
0%
0%
0%
17%
60%
5%
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
© 2025. Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets.
0%
0%
16%
76%
8%
Participant |
University |
Vote |
Confidence |
Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
![]() Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Like the mortgage interest deduction, the federal tax subsidy to employer-provided health insurance plans causes excess consumption.
|
||||
![]() Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
![]() Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
![]() David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
![]() Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
![]() Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Just scratches the surface of the reforms needed in health-care policy
|
||||
![]() Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
I think so. It would be better to count employer-based health insurance as taxable income, but the Cadillac tax is better than nothing.
|
||||
![]() Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
The Cad tax is meant to counter other distortions so this is a q of whether 4th best fixes 3rd best. An economist who says he knows is wrong
|
||||
![]() Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
The rate is too high. Better idea is to make insurance costs equally deductible for all.
|
||||
![]() Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Depends on what happens to the rest of the Obamcare mandates and side payments that are still be litigated
|
||||
![]() Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
![]() Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
![]() Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Even better would be to divorce the provision of health care from employment entirely, but that is probably not a realistic possibility.
|
||||
![]() José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
![]() Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
It will reduce distortions, but I'm not sure by how much
|
||||
![]() Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
![]() Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
The basic reasoning for the tax is sound, but the market is so rife with imperfections that our simple models might be quite misleading.
|