Question A:
Implementing a "destination based cash flow tax (including border adjustment)" of the type advocated by Speaker Ryan would substantially reduce the US trade deficit within the next few years.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question B:
Implementing a “destination based cash flow tax (including border adjustment)” of the type advocated by Speaker Ryan would substantially raise prices for US consumers.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question A Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Replacing the sales tax with a value-added tax would be a good idea. This is less clear, but no major effect deficit.
|
||||
Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
I'm reasonably persuaded by Auerbach and Holtz-Eakin, but I'm not certain that U.S. currency will fall one-for-one with the border tax
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
Only in the short-run possibly. In the long-run, dollar appreciation will reduce the advantage of US exporters.
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
I understand the exchange rate argument but am not certain of a full offset.
-see background information here |
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
I am assuming that trade retaliation and changes in foreign exchange prices are not big enough within three years to overcome the effect.
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
Would depend on the reaction of other variables affecting investment & saving, starting with the exchange rate.
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
It's just like a VAT. Countries with VATs do not get a trade advantage. Consumers pay same rate on import/domestic. Exch rates offset/adjust
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
I don't know what the effects of a destination based tax would be or whether it would improve matters. I would prefer a consumption tax.
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
The impact will not be "substantial". Trade deficit implies capital surplus; what is bad about that?
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Currency offset is unlikely to be one for one, so some trade effects are likely. Magnitude would depend on the size of the tax.
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Substantially needs defining, but because unlikely full ex rate adjustment, not negligible effect.
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
There are too many unknowns, including the reactions of other countries, to have any confidence that this would reduce the deficit.
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
Should have only second order effects. Imperfect exchange rate adjustment may cause more real impact, but "substantial" not plausible.
|
Question B Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
If dollar does not lose value to fully offset tax, then yes, consumer prices will rise.
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
Would depend on the reaction of other variables, starting with the exchange rate.
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Amy Finkelstein |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
The point of the tax is to shift fr/producers who are mobile to consumers who aren't. That means consumer prices go up. There's no magic.
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
I don't know what the effects of a destination based tax would be or whether it would improve matters. I would prefer a consumption tax.
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Certainly in the short run.
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Magnitude hard to judge but lobbying by Walmart is not an accident, some pass through into prices likely.
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
"Substantially" here would mean 1 -2 % on level of CPI.
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Whatever the effect on the deficit, it is likely to have adverse effects on domestic prices.
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|