US

Bailouts: Banks and Automakers

Question A:

Taking into account all of the economic consequences — including the incentives of banks to ensure their own liquidity and solvency in the future — the benefits of bailing out U.S. banks in 2008 will end up exceeding the costs.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Because GM and Chrysler were bailed out in 2008-09, the U.S. unemployment rate was lower at the end of 2010 than it would it have been if Congress and the executive branch had not intervened.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Taking into account all of the economic consequences — including effects on corporate managers' incentives and on creditors' expectations of how their claims will be treated in future bankruptcies — the benefits of bailing out GM and Chrysler will end up exceeding the costs.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Long term unemployed workers are costly; many collect SSDI. Aiding GM was likely a cost effective welfare/employment program, all else aside
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
On net I agree, but the future costs are difficult to measure.
Currie
Janet Currie
Princeton
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Absent those bailouts, a depression was much more likely. The moral hazard is now being reduced by new rules, such as for capital.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The past bailout, by itself, won't ensure the next one, nor would a refusal to bail firms out set a binding precedent.
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
"Bailing out the banks" is not a very precise characterization of the policies of 2008-9.
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Too many possibilities, and hard to measure costs and benefits.
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The consequenses (economic and social) of a potential financial collapse would have been immense.
Goldin
Claudia Goldin
Harvard
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
may not cost $ but was still an outrage we got to that point
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Yes. Credit markets were frozen and that was having a terrible impact on the economy. Check out a graph of the TED spread.
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Not compared to an ideal policy of an orderly reorganization imposing losses on creditors according to seniority. But better than chaotic.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
10
Bio/Vote History
Bankruptcy and liquidation would have been worse, but could have nationalized a couple of the weakest ones, especially Citi.
-see background information here
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Lazear
Edward Lazear
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Shin
Hyun Song Shin
Princeton
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Many details could have been improved but you could do nothing.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Zingales
Luigi Zingales
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Putting costs aside, this is almost certainly true since many displaced workers would not have found reemployment by now in bad economy.
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Currie
Janet Currie
Princeton
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
To answer this would require a reliable and detailed quantitative macroeconomic model, or at least expert empirical knowledge.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
While I agree, I would have preferred seeing the gov stand behind warantees and provide debtor in possession finance only.
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Probably yes, but a very small effect.
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
In the short run, it seems uncontroversial.
Goldin
Claudia Goldin
Harvard
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
as with banks, even if true, outrageous we ever got to that position
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
the strongest argument is US auto manufacturing would be better off in the long run, which may or may not be true, but v doubtful by 2010
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Again, it would have been better to reorganize with suitable losses on the junior creditors. This would not have resulted in higher unemp.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
But traditional bankruptcy and restructuring was an option too. Challenges for financial and non-financial firms are totally different.
-see background information here
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Lazear
Edward Lazear
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Shin
Hyun Song Shin
Princeton
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
There was no private money available.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Zingales
Luigi Zingales
Chicago Booth
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Currie
Janet Currie
Princeton
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Strongly Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The bankruptcy law was circumvented. Absent unstated exigent (e.g. systemic) reasons, upsetting creditor rights is inefficient.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Incentive effects are real. Incentive effects from a decision to bail out are overstated.
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Again, hard to measure costs and benefits.
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Goldin
Claudia Goldin
Harvard
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
See previous answer
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Costs will appear in the next crisis; the precedent for a bailout is now set. Reduced incentives for the private sector to hold dry powder.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Lazear
Edward Lazear
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Not at all obvious at the time decision was made, and I expect many would disagree now.
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Moral hazard seems less of a problem with non-financial corporations.
Shin
Hyun Song Shin
Princeton
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Zingales
Luigi Zingales
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History