A Quarter Century of the Euro

Question A:

Europe’s economic growth performance over the last 25 years has been measurably better than it would have been in the absence of the single currency.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

With euro area member states having given up their ability to carry out independent monetary policy, it is substantially more difficult for them to respond effectively to country-specific macroeconomic disturbances.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
I think this is probably true but measuring relative to the counterfactual is very difficult. This is especially so given the Eurozone crisis.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Strongly Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
It has avoided what would likely have been exchange rate crises in the weaker countries. But it has made normal macroeconomic adjustment substantially harder, in the absence of country specific monetary policy and exchange rate.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Counterfactual exercise is always difficult. Nevertheless there is serious empirical evidence of the positive impact of the single market, although not all has been reaped yet (services).
-see background information here
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Maybe not uniformly true for all euro countries though
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
Sciences Po
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Disappointing result to date reflect weakness of euro area risk-sharing and poor national macroeconomic management
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Even if there were no endogenous dynamics strengthening the businesses in the Eurozone, which I believe to exist, the shere abolition of exchange risk and the associated costs of risk management will had a positive impact on Eurozone growth.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Strongly Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Evidence for overall economic growth in Euro adopting countries is decidedly mixed, though the effects differ across countries. However, evidence for the growth effect of EU integration is generally positive. Perhaps success of Euro should be judged on price stability?
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Since the performance was mediocre, one may dream of a rosier alternative. But, insofar as we would have the two big shocks---a financial crisis in 2007-08 and a pandemic in 2020 anyway---without the euro, many EA regions would have done much worse in response to them.
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
The Euro has been positive for growth in important respects but 2010-12 showed risks of monetary union without more fiscal integration
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Long-run growth depends on structural factors. Monetary and exchange rate policy are generally neutral over the long-run. There are some euro area members that have probably benefitted from macroeconomic stability relative to the alternative but growth effects would be minor.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Better only inasmuch it has prevented currency crises.

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Monetary policy is certainly a powerful policy tool but in addition there are fiscal policy and various other policies. Also, ECB monetary policy is potentially much more powerful than a single country's. Whether there is a substantial difference is again difficult to establish.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
this was half of my answer to the first question.
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Botticini
Maristella Botticini
Bocconi
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Europeans have limited experience of floating regimes.. Furthermore, in principle fiscal policy is more effective within a monetary union than in a flex regime.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Gorodnichenko
Yuriy Gorodnichenko
Berkeley
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Guriev
Sergei Guriev
Sciences Po
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Pre-euro national monetary policies were often destabilising.
Javorcik
Beata Javorcik
University of Oxford
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
The statement is probably true. But keep in mind that the number of state-specific macro incidences may have declined as well - caused by the monetary unionl.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Mayer
Thierry Mayer
Sciences-Po Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
With common monetary policy and EU-wide constraints on fiscal policy, there aren't many country-specific policies left to offset country-specific shocks. One remaining tool is macroprudential policy, but its potency is limited.
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Propper
Carol Propper
Imperial College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Rasul
Imran Rasul
University College London
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School
Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Reis
Ricardo Reis
London School of Economics
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
More difficult, but not substantially more difficult. Also, for many of the countries, decades of experience showed that independent monetary policy was not optimal or even good monetary policy.
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Unability to depreciate versus higher resilience due to better monetary and financial stability frameworks.
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Storesletten
Kjetil Storesletten
University of Minnesota
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Sturm
Daniel Sturm
London School of Economics
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Tenreyro
Silvana Tenreyro
LSE
Agree
1
Bio/Vote History
Important to note that there are other macro costs and benefits to weigh in when evaluating the advantages of a monetary union, beyond the cost of giving up independent monetary policy (such cost is mitigated by the high correlation of shocks and spillovers across EA countries).
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Van der Ploeg
Rick Van der Ploeg
Oxford
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
And independent monetary policy has been valuable for the UK
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin
Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
This statement ignores the reality of European monetary policy prior to the euro. Exchange rate stability was highly valued and the EMS required countries to largely shadow the Bundesbank's interest rates. EMU at least gives everyone a say in policy.
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
That's it, no own central bank anymore.