About
- Professor, London School of Economics
- Commander of the British Empire
- Member of the IMF Managing Director’s External Advisory Group
- External Member, Monetary Policy Committee, Bank of England (2017-2023)
Voting History
Question A: Matching US import tariffs to the tariffs, value-added taxes and non-tariff barriers imposed on US goods by other countries would substantially reduce the US trade deficit.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question B: The threat of retaliation against the imposition of higher tariffs on a country’s exports substantially lowers the probability of a trade war.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question C: In the event that the threat of retaliation does not deter the imposition of tariffs, the economies of countries subject to higher tariffs on their exports would be measurably better off by responding with targeted tariffs on imports from the first mover.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question A: The wave of immigration to Germany after 2015 (and up to the Russian invasion of Ukraine) has been a net positive for the country's economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question B: Immigration to EU countries has been a net positive for government finances, adding substantially more in tax revenues than the increased costs associated with integration of immigrants.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question C: Given Europe's low and falling fertility rates (from seven million births per year in 1960 to four million today), maintaining its position as a world economic power will require increased immigration over the medium term.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question A: Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/putting-america-first-in-international-environmental-agreements/
'In recent years, the United States has purported to join international agreements and initiatives that do not reflect our country's values or our contributions to the pursuit of economic and environmental objectives... The United States Ambassador to the United Nations shall immediately submit formal written notification of the United States' withdrawal from the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.'
US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement will deliver a measurable boost to the country's economic growth over the next four years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question B: US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement will have a measurably negative impact on international progress on mitigation of global warming.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question A: A baseline US tariff of 10% on all European imported goods would have substantially damaging economic consequences for many countries in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question B: Rather than responding to threatened tariffs with retaliatory measures, unilaterally opening EU markets to US exports would deliver better outcomes for European industry.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: The answer depends, amongst other factors, on whether potential tariffs are permanent or temporary. From EU's perspective, a limited and more selective retaliation might be less damaging than a blanket-all sectors retaliation.
|
Question C: Disruptions to global supply chains from new tariffs and trade wars will lead to measurably slower global growth over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: I would expect growth with tariffs and trade disruptions to be lower than without. The projections for the next 5 years are very strong to start with. Tariffs will detract from that high baseline.
|
Question A: The likely need for increased European public investment in defense should come with substantial reallocations of public budgets at the national and EU levels.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question B: Greater use of joint EU-level procurement of military equipment and defense research/innovation would promote substantially enhanced capacity in Europe's defense industry.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question C: Increased defense spending would deliver a measurable boost to economic growth in Europe over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: It depends on how much Europe relies on imports of defence and military equipment versus domestic production
|