About
- Professor of Finance and Director, Research Center SAFE & Center for Financial Studies
- Member of the International Advisory Board of LABEX ReFi (2016-present)
- President of the European Finance Association (2011)
- CEPR Research Fellow (since 1998)
Voting History
Question A: The reductions in Western programs of development assistance will have no measurable effects on GDP growth in the recipient countries over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Ending development aid does have an effect on GDP both directly, as the dollar spent are reduced, and indirectly, as the role played by programs for education and government efficiency for growth are reduced as well.
|
Question B: The reductions in Western programs of development assistance will have substantially negative effects on the most vulnerable people in the recipient countries over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Unless we believe that development money is spent in a completely inefficient way, the negative effect on vulnerable people is what we have to expect.
|
Question C: Development assistance motivated by the potential benefits for the donors in terms of prosperity and security is measurably more effective in promoting GDP growth in recipient countries than aid based on humanitarian or other moral principles.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Disagree |
5 |
|
Question A: Matching US import tariffs to the tariffs, value-added taxes and non-tariff barriers imposed on US goods by other countries would substantially reduce the US trade deficit.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
No Opinion |
Disagree |
7 |
|
|
Question B: The threat of retaliation against the imposition of higher tariffs on a country’s exports substantially lowers the probability of a trade war.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Under standard conditions of political decision making, I would agree with the statement - but the current administration seems to follow a different script in which a trade war may be the desired outcome.
|
Question C: In the event that the threat of retaliation does not deter the imposition of tariffs, the economies of countries subject to higher tariffs on their exports would be measurably better off by responding with targeted tariffs on imports from the first mover.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Targeted retaliatory tariffs are likely to mobilize more inner protest in the US than otherwise.
|
Question A: The wave of immigration to Germany after 2015 (and up to the Russian invasion of Ukraine) has been a net positive for the country's economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: There are pluses and minuses. Plus: Immigration has been largely about young people who, over the longer term, are likely to contribute to economic output. Minus: without consistent immigration policy, many people arriving are lowly/non-educated, implying high integration costs.
|
Question B: Immigration to EU countries has been a net positive for government finances, adding substantially more in tax revenues than the increased costs associated with integration of immigrants.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: see previous question: integration costs are far higher than economic benefits, let alone tax income. In some countries, like Germany, immigrants are overwhelmingly on the asylum track of immigration, which leads to long periods in which joining the workforce is prohibited.
|
Question C: Given Europe's low and falling fertility rates (from seven million births per year in 1960 to four million today), maintaining its position as a world economic power will require increased immigration over the medium term.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Aging populations are the fate of all countries in the world, sooner or later. Staying productive and powerful when population age is rising is possible. It requires flexible social institutions, like gliding retirement age, holding the ratio of workers to pensioners constant
|
Question A: Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/putting-america-first-in-international-environmental-agreements/
'In recent years, the United States has purported to join international agreements and initiatives that do not reflect our country's values or our contributions to the pursuit of economic and environmental objectives... The United States Ambassador to the United Nations shall immediately submit formal written notification of the United States' withdrawal from the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.'
US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement will deliver a measurable boost to the country's economic growth over the next four years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Since the effect of climate policy oN GDP was not clear in the first place, it remains open whether a reduction of climate change-oriented public policy will eventually affect GDP.
|
Question B: US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement will have a measurably negative impact on international progress on mitigation of global warming.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: The US retreat from climate accord will arouse critique and counter movements in some parts of the world. These movements may well help to shape the climate policy in a more effective way. On balance, the prospect is uncertain, depending on two competing effects.
|
Question A: A baseline US tariff of 10% on all European imported goods would have substantially damaging economic consequences for many countries in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question B: Rather than responding to threatened tariffs with retaliatory measures, unilaterally opening EU markets to US exports would deliver better outcomes for European industry.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: This is a ceteris-paribus statement. But in reality there will be a sequence of actions, and whether or not to retaliate will have an impact on next round tariff decisions in the US.
|
Question C: Disruptions to global supply chains from new tariffs and trade wars will lead to measurably slower global growth over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: I tend to agree, but I also believe that the overall effect may be small, due to the re-organization of supply chains.
|
Question A: The likely need for increased European public investment in defense should come with substantial reallocations of public budgets at the national and EU levels.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: An increase in defense spending to 3 or 4 percent of GDP cannot be achieved by simply creating a one-time special purpose fund, or by increasing debt. Unless taxes are raised which is unlikely, given the high taxation level in most EU countries, budget rebalancing is necessary.
|
Question B: Greater use of joint EU-level procurement of military equipment and defense research/innovation would promote substantially enhanced capacity in Europe's defense industry.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: Increased spending does not automatically lead to increased investment in the relevant industries, because procurement may happen in the international market, particularly the US.
|
Question C: Increased defense spending would deliver a measurable boost to economic growth in Europe over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: It all depends on where procurement will take place, and thus where the defense industry will grow - in the EU, or abroad.
|
On the basis of current climate policy commitments and potential technology and market responses, my current best estimate for global warming is that average global temperatures by 2100 will rise to no more than 2.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: The mood in many countries shifts away from giving climate concern high priority in policy agendas. On the other hand, climate sensitive investment strategies are increasingly popular among private agents. Taken together, necessary action happens, although speed is limited.
|
Question A: A period of high inflation is substantially more electorally damaging to incumbent governments in advanced countries than a period of high unemployment.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
7 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Without "hard" evidence at hand, I can merely speculate. Here I do: It seems reasonable to me that observing soaring unemployment figures appears to be more tangible, more noticeable, than higher prices everywhere. As always, things depend on relative magnitudes...
|
Question B: Voters are more likely to punish incumbents for what they perceive as poor national economic performance than they are to reward incumbents for a good economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: I tend to agree for reasons borrowing from prospect theory. Losses and gains of equal magnitude are translated into "utils" of different magnitude, the former being larger than the latter, in absolute terms.
|
Question A: The institutions of society - such as constitutions, laws, judiciaries, and property rights - substantially shape economic decisions, policies, and outcomes.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
6 |
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Comment: This is the basic insight of institutional economics since the 1990s - shaping the research agenda not only in developing economics, but also in areas like financial economics. I recall a World Bank publication of 1994 entitled "Development finance as institution building" ...
|
Question B: On average and over the long term, democracies deliver substantially better economic growth than other forms of government.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: The political system (democracy or autocracy) is one among several conditions that explain economic growth. Abundance of natural resources is another one (think of Saudi Arabia). Other factors like population growth, war or natural disasters matter as well.
|
Question C: Countries where democracy and the rule of law are weakened are likely to experience measurable damage to their economic performance.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Same answer as to the previous question: Democracy is not necessarily a growth engine - other factors may be more important for economic performance.
|
Question A: Current enforcement of competition policy in Europe is not working to promote innovation and growth.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: For infrastructure investment, like platforms or basis software, competition is all too often defined at the level of the national or European economy, rather than globally. Which is one factor contributing to the near absence of European providers of basic technologies.
|
Question B: European Union bureaucracy and regulations are a substantial constraint on innovation in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: It is typically not the European regulation per-se that causes implementation costs, but rather the parallel existence of national regulation and implementation rules that causes anger, costs - eventually constraining investment and innovation.
|
Question C: The conduct of the dominant US tech companies in European markets (including lobbying and acquisition of start-ups and competitors) is a substantial constraint on innovation in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: A lack of cooperation among European firms (developing software jointly, for example), often for alleged anti-trust reasons, or the fear thereof, hampers Innovation, resulting in no, or failed, infrastructure investment.
|
Question A: In pursuing social and environmental initiatives, the average public company generates more benefits than costs in terms of profits.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: It all depends upon customer response to firms' CSR activities. If customers value CSR activities more than the accompanying increase in production costs, then profits may rise. If they are indifferent as to CSR, they will not accept higher prices, and firm profits will fall.
|
Question B: In pursuing social and environmental initiatives, public companies would benefit from a measurably lower cost of capital.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Equilibrium effects of preference-driven stock picking (i.e. selective portfolio composition) are likely to be small at best. Because different investors have different preferences, inducing arbitrage operations that, in equilibrium, equalize risk adjusted cost of capital.
|
Question C: There are substantial social benefits when managers of public companies make choices that account for the impact of their decisions on customers, employees, and community members beyond the effects on shareholders.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Taking strong decisions in favor of one group may or may not outweigh the indirect negative consequences (e.g. lower taxes) for other groups. This renders an "net effect assessment" difficult.
|
Question A: US antitrust investigations of the dominant firms in artificial intelligence are warranted by the need to foster competition and innovation in the technologies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: This is less of an anti-trust issue than a natural monopoly problem. Either way, competition is required to keep power and profitability at bay.
|
Question B: Seeking to slow the pace of artificial intelligence use and implementation would be a more effective means of assessing potential harms from the technologies than market deployment and ex post assessment.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
4 |
Comment: There is also an issue of global competition An international, coordinated slowdown of innovation is not going to happen. In this case it is better to be among the leaders than the followers.
|
Question A: The proposed US tariffs on Chinese EVs would lead to measurably higher employment in the US automotive industry over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Tariffs on EVs will lead to retaliation (not affecting US car industry that much, because it is weak on exports) and relocation (on-shoring Chinese care producers). As a result, for existing car industry in US, EV tariffs will likely not increase employment.
|
Question B: The proposed US tariffs on Chinese EVs would measurably slow the adoption of green technology by consumers.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: View on US only. Several effects to be expected: EV tariffs bring Chinese companies to the US (raising transition speed), shifting supply to more expensive US firms (lowering green transition), plus: tariff signals roll-back on green transition.
|
Question C: Unless the EU matches the proposed US tariffs on Chinese EVs, there would be measurably lower employment in Europe's automotive industry over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: US EV-tariffs lead top increased demand for combustibles, and more exports from EU. Moreover, without higher EU-tariffs on EVs, EU car industry will adjust fast to EV transition, becoming more competitive, and eventually increasing employment, ceteris paribus.
|
Question A: Greater integration of national markets for financial services, energy and telecommunications would give a measurable boost to Europe’s GDP over the next ten years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: First order effect expected - iff (!) steps towards integration solve EU's sovereignty dilemma: decentralized supervision introduces biases in rule implementation, undermining trust by investors. Take Germany's Wirecard as an extreme example of national bias.
|
Question B: The potential benefits for GDP from loosening European merger rules to allow greater consolidation within the single market would outweigh the potential harm to consumers from weaker competition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: While understanding the argument in the question posed, I am uncertain about the consequences. The net effect may be industry-dependent. E.g., European mergers in banking would actually increase competition, because they would open up otherwise largely closed national markets.
|
Question A:Creation of a more unified capital market in Europe - with a common pool of capital, a single rule book and a strengthened European Securities and Markets Authority, comparable to the US Securities and Exchange Commission – would lead to a substantial shift in the balance of companies listing their shares in the EU vis-a-vis the US.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: I "agree"m, although not "strongly", because we do not understand well why firms refrain from going public despite high earnings and excellent growth prospects - which is the case for many Mittelstand-firms in Germany. There may be additional reasons for firms to stay private...
|
Question B: Creation of a more unified capital market in Europe - with a common pool of capital, a single rule book and a strengthened European Securities and Markets Authority, comparable to the US Securities and Exchange Commission – would substantially increase the availability of funding for start-ups and growing companies across the EU.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: I subscribe to the common corporate finance view that better stock market access will increase capital inflow into new business ventures - because exit potential has risen.
|
Question A: The European Union's AI Act was approved by the European Parliament in March 2024: https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-act/
The EU's legislation to regulate artificial intelligence is likely to put European technology firms at a substantial disadvantage to their competitors elsewhere in the world.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: The rules of the AI Act apply to all developers who intend to become active in Europe, no matter where they are located and whether they are final or intermediate product.
|
Question B: By providing a clear set of rules, the EU's legislation on artificial intelligence is likely to enhance research and innovation by firms building the new technology.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Disagree |
4 |
Comment: Other countries, nota by US, may follow suit with similar rules at some point. So, following these rules will likely be the rational strategy for all AI companies - which means that European developers are not at a distinct disadvantage or an advantage either.
|
Question A: Europe’s economic growth performance over the last 25 years has been measurably better than it would have been in the absence of the single currency.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Even if there were no endogenous dynamics strengthening the businesses in the Eurozone, which I believe to exist, the shere abolition of exchange risk and the associated costs of risk management will had a positive impact on Eurozone growth.
|
Question B: With euro area member states having given up their ability to carry out independent monetary policy, it is substantially more difficult for them to respond effectively to country-specific macroeconomic disturbances.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
8 |
Comment: The statement is probably true. But keep in mind that the number of state-specific macro incidences may have declined as well - caused by the monetary unionl.
|
A legalized and carefully regulated market for cannabis would lead to measurably higher social welfare than a system of prohibition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Although I have my doubts about the "measurability" of welfare gain, but in my opinion one should be open for a change, try "legalization" out for a certain period, say 5 years, and then evaluate the effects - both in terms of benefits and social costs.
|
Question A: The economic and financial sanctions against Russia are substantially limiting its ability to wage war on Ukraine.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: We clearly do not know the counterfactual, Russia's "ease-of-war" that would have been possible without sanctions. That said, the main effect of sanctions is on the West, not Russia. The West has self-committed to maximally reduce dependency on Russia, e.g. energy, minerals.
|
Question B: In the absence of continuing flows of Western economic aid, Ukraine's wartime economy will be substantially compromised.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Ukraine's almost complete loss of export earnings is largely compensated by transfer payments and loans from other countries and multilateral institutions. Without it, Ukraine couldn't import the way it does today.
|
Question A: A constitutional rule that limits the size of budget deficits that governments can run as a share of GDP is an effective way to impose discipline on a country’s public finances.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: The constitutional debt brake certainly imposes discipline, and it imposes pressure on non-investment spending. It does, by the way, not necessarily limit investment iff infrastructure investment is financed via private co-financing - typically requiring user fees to be imposed.
|
Question B: Germany’s debt brake is a substantial constraint on vital public investment in physical/digital infrastructure and the green transition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Despite my earlier argument, namely that the debt brake can be "loosened" via PPP programs, the political reality in Germany clearly has little tolerance for user fees, and therefore the debt brake also cuts into public spending, moistly on investment - unfortunately.
|
Question A:The fundamental cause of Argentina’s high inflation is unfunded fiscal commitments that are being financed by the central bank.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Don't know enough about Argentina's fiscal history to judge.
|
Question B: Even if Argentina could marshal the resources to make a full switch to using US dollars for domestic transactions, it would substantially increase the volatility of Argentine GDP.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: If GDP is measured in USD, then exchange rate and inflation will tend to move in opposite directions, stabilizing GDP numbers.
|
Question A: It is best for society if the management of publicly traded corporations only considers the impact of their decisions on customers, employees, and community members to the extent that these effects feedback to affect shareholder wealth.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: The decision taken by management should, to the extent possible, reflect the preferences of shareholders - whether that is identical to shareholder value or not depends on their preferences. The practical problem today is that shareholder preferences are not elicited...
|
Question B: The typical chief executive officer of a publicly traded corporation is paid more than his or her marginal contribution to the firm's value.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: I do not think that a clearcut judgement as to whether the MP of managers is greater or smaller than their payment can seriously be made. There is heterogeneity and variation...
|
Question A: By enabling women’s life choices about education, work and family, the contraceptive pill made a substantial contribution to closing gender gaps in the labor market for professionals.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question B: Gender gaps in today’s labor market arise less from differences in educational and occupational choices than from the differential career impact of parenthood and social norms around men's and women’s roles in childrearing.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question C: The gender gap in pay would be substantially reduced if firms had fewer incentives to offer disproportionate rewards to individuals who work long and/or inflexible hours.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question A: The EU's taxonomy for sustainable activities - a classification system that defines criteria for economic activities that are aligned with a net zero trajectory by 2050 and the broader environmental goals other than climate - is an effective way to steer greener investment and the energy transition by firms and financial institutions.
Details on the taxonomy are here:
https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/tools-and-standards/eu-taxonomy-sustainable-activities_en
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Uncertain |
6 |
|
|
Question B: Use of the EU taxonomy for sustainable activities is likely to stifle important innovations, including in green technology.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Uncertain |
5 |
|
|
Question C: On balance, use of the taxonomy in EU directives and regulation is likely to be net beneficial to European citizens.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Uncertain |
6 |
|
|
Question A: Fiscal rules on budget deficits and public debt levels are an essential part of a sound fiscal framework.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Fiscal rules are not necessarily essential - namely if there is credible mechanism to restructure sovereign debt. If that were the case, market discipline alone would help to keep debt at a sustainable level.
|
Question B: Since the inception of the Stability and Growth Pact, budget deficits in Europe have been measurably lower, on average, than would have been the case without common budget rules.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: I haven't seen the counterfactuals, but I could imagine that SGP has had some impact on debt levels.
|
Question C: Since the inception of the Stability and Growth Pact, the path of GDP growth in Europe has been measurably more stable than would have been the case without common budget rules.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Disagree |
6 |
|
Question A: Non-bank financial intermediaries pose a substantial threat to financial stability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Agree |
6 |
|
|
Question B: Regulating the leverage and liquidity of non-bank financial intermediaries would substantially improve financial stability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Agree |
7 |
|
|
Question C: Given current regulations, non-bank financial intermediaries should not have access to central bank support.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Uncertain |
6 |
|
|
Question A: A significant factor behind today’s inflation in Europe is dominant corporations in uncompetitive markets taking advantage of their market power to raise prices in order to increase their profit margins.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Not knowing the numbers, I can only guess - and disagree with the anti-market undertone of the statement. If anything, higher prices induce investment and increased supply (and lower prices) down the road.
|
Question B: A significant factor behind today’s inflation in some sectors of the European economy is dominant corporations in uncompetitive markets taking advantage of their market power to raise prices in order to increase their profit margins.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: If true, why haven't they taken advantage earlier?
|
Question C: A significant factor behind today’s inflation in some sectors of the European economy (both competitive and concentrated) is distortions in the aggregate economy where supply does not meet demand.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
|
Question A: If countries could impose a ban on the use of ChatGPT and similar generative AI chatbot services that is technologically effective, they would experience a measurably negative impact on national innovation.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: It seems (!) compelling to see AI (and ChatGPT) as a basic innovation that will alter services across many sectors. Thus, banning would be a barrier to participating in these developments.
|
Question B: Regardless of whether advances in AI spur productivity growth, they are likely to create deep challenges for society – in areas from labor markets to politics, and including disinformation, privacy, crime, and warfare – that will be difficult to anticipate, plan for, and contain.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: I see challenges, but no insurmountable obstacles.
|
Question A: Use of artificial intelligence over the next ten years will lead to a substantial increase in the growth rates of real per capita income in the US and Western Europe over the subsequent two decades.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Uncertain |
5 |
|
|
Question B: Use of artificial intelligence over the next ten years will have a substantially bigger impact on the growth rates of real per capita income in the US and Western Europe over the subsequent two decades than the internet has had over the past two decades.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Uncertain |
5 |
|
|
Question A: Preserving the financial viability of France's state pension system is better achieved by raising the effective retirement age than by raising contributions while working.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Raising contributions to counter the demographic effect is probably not sustainable, while raising pension age is. The reason is that rising contributions may spur exits from the workforce, either by switching to the shadow economy, or by quitting altogether.
|
Question B: Preserving the financial viability of France's state pension system is better achieved by raising the effective retirement age than by reducing benefits once retired.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: I disagree with the either-or choice: Because there is another possible option: offering different retirement age-payment level pairs, with equal present value (i.e., on an iso-PV-line) - to accommodate different preferences for work and pay level.
|
Question A: Financial regulators in the US and Europe lack the tools and authority to deter runs on banks by uninsured depositors.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: One way to avoid a run would require a safeguard for all holders of demand deposits, whether small or large, individual or corporate. The safeguard could be preferably designed as an insurance scheme, or as an extended liquidity requirement.
|
Question B: Not guaranteeing uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley Bank in full would have created substantial damage to the US economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: I tend to agree here, because of SVB's special business model and the large number of small corporates/start-ups that seem to have stored their funds at the bank.
|
Question C: Fully guaranteeing uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley Bank substantially increases banks’ incentives to engage in excessive risk-taking.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: I am ticking "uncertain" because the answer depends on what the regulator imposes in exchange for an unconditional demand deposit insurance. If one follows the European BRRD model, lots of bail-in debt could strengthen market discipline, and avoid an increase in risk taking.
|
Question A: The amendments to the Northern Ireland protocol agreed by the UK and the EU are unlikely to have a measurable direct impact on UK growth over the next two years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: The Northern Ireland trade volume is limited in size, relative to the UK economy. The importance of "Windsor" agreement is more symbolic, and it eases the path towards better collaboration between UK and EU in the future. In this indirect way, there agreement may impact growth.
|
Question B: If renewed UK-EU scientific cooperation were achieved in the wake of the Windsor framework, it would be likely to have a measurable positive impact on UK growth over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Actual scientific collaboration will not change by much (with or without the framework), and I guess that UK will substitute for EU money anyway - given that net funding of Research via EU is close to zero anyway (note: participation in Horizon program requires co-funding by UK).
|
Question A: Adam Smith’s metaphor of the invisible hand has been foundational to the development of modern economic theory.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: The metaphor has been enormously helpful to spark interest, curiosity and also: fierce opposition to the idea that, under certain conditions, markets aggregate information and allow decentralized action to be coordinated. While important and effective, it is not foundational,
|
Question B: Adam Smith’s metaphor of the invisible hand has been commonly misinterpreted as advocacy for pure laissez-faire capitalism.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: At least this is the way how it is typically used in today's press: as evidently false...
|
Question A: Loosening regulations on state aid to allow targeted incentives for companies in certain sectors will substantially improve the EU’s relative attractiveness for corporate investment.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: In contrast to the US, there are 27 EU countries starting to incentivize investment - a lot of it may be used to compete internally, thereby weakening or even nullifying the aggregate effect.
|
Question B: Loosening regulations on state aid will give a substantial advantage to the economies of EU members with stronger public finances.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: While strong public finances will allow a country to spend more, the EU procurement rules limit the possibility to target investment in a particular country - as large investment are subjected to a EU-wide call for tender.
|
Question C: Even if looser regulations on state aid are temporary, they risk permanent damage to the EU’s longstanding competition policy regime.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Yes, I fear so...
|
Question A: Without government intervention, take-up of electric vehicles will be substantially less than is desirable to reduce carbon emissions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Cars using fossil fuels do not internalize climate externalities, hence they sell too cheap, and electric vehicles need subsidies, one way or the other, to become sufficiently attractive for consumers.
|
Question B: To encourage greater take-up of electric vehicles, public expenditure on infrastructure to support them (such as charging stations) is likely to be more cost-effective than providing equivalent amounts as tax credits/purchase rebates for buyers.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Investing in infrastructure pays off for current and future generations, whereas rebates affect only today's consumers, i.e. it is a public versus private good decision.
|
Question A: Network externalities give Twitter an incumbent advantage that will slow substantially the migration of users who would prefer alternative platforms.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Evident. The problem is more sever if there were more than one „challenger“ apps to Twitter, because of a coordination problem.
|
Question B: As of now, there needs to be more government regulation around Twitter’s content moderation and personal data protection.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
5 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: Whatnis required iis not so much content regulation, but identity revelation, so that the right to free speech is accompanied by full personal responsibility.
|
Question A: The carbon border adjustment mechanism will ensure that the European Union’s green objectives are not undermined by the relocation of EU production in the sectors under the mechanism to non-EU countries with less ambitious climate policies (‘carbon leakage').
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: The undermining of sustainable production processes through global competition is indeed hampered by the CBAM. But, of course, at a cost that needs to be addressed as well, namely the willingness of "the north" to invest in better technologies in "the south" - insurance may help
|
Question B: To the extent that the carbon border adjustment mechanism is effective in reducing emissions and carbon leakage, it will impose substantial costs on the economies of poorer countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: This is why a policy of targeted transfers ("green international aid") can allow improved technology investments in "the south" to reach profitability.
|
Question A: Research on the nature and impact of bank runs has made it possible to limit the occurrence of financial crises and the economic damage they cause.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Fundamental research such as Diamond/Dybvig's has trained the thinking of the entire profession, and in that sense it has contributed to a post-crisis regulation such as the BRRD in Europe, emphasizing equity and bail-in debt to establish market discipline, and to fight runs..
|
Question B: Despite repeated reforms of financial regulation (and macroprudential policies in some countries), there will always be occasional financial crises.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Financial crises don't repeat themselves - because there is learning on the side of both, regulators and investors. But there are also --always-- unknown interdependencies in markets and between institutions, unexpectedly coming to light, and potentially triggering a crisis.
|
Question A: The UK’s removal of the cap on bankers' bonuses (introduced by the EU in 2014 and which limits payouts to two times annual base salary) will provide a measurable boost to the country’s economic growth.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: The impact of the bonus system on the quality of management is probably not large enough, to have any measurable impact on growth or GDP.
|
Question B: Removing the cap on bankers' bonuses will measurably enhance the global competitiveness of the UK’s financial services sector.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: The UK financial services sector is already very competitive. This will not change much as a consequence of lifting the bonus cup. Also, competing institutions in other jurisdictions can adjust the fixed salary to remain competitive.
|
Question C: Removing the cap on bankers' bonuses will pose a measurable risk to financial stability in the UK.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Whether measurable or not, the lifting of the bonus cap while competing jurisdictions in the EU do not, may spur the concentration of risk taking activities in London.
|
Question A: A price cap imposed by the G7/EU countries on purchases of Russian oil and oil-related products (and which applies to all importers of Russian oil using Western trade infrastructure, shipping, and insurance) would be an effective measure to reduce the flow of revenues to Russia.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Given a price cap, Russia could either accept it or reject it. If it accepted, then revenues will be reduced unless either quantity is rising (demand rises w/ lower prices) or prices in the non-affected markt is rising. If rejected, Russia may face additional costs in marketing.
|
Question B: The oil price cap imposed by the G7/EU countries will not have a substantial effect on the world oil price (such as the Brent crude benchmark).
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Given a price cap, Russia could either accept it or reject it. If it accepted, then revenues will be reduced unless either quantity is rising (demand rises w/ lower prices) or prices in the non-affected markt is rising. If rejected, Russia may face additional costs in marketing.
|
Question A: The increasing share of income and wealth among the richest people in a number of advanced countries is giving significantly more political power to the wealthy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question B: The increasing share of income and wealth among the richest people in a number of advanced countries is having a significantly negative effect on intergenerational social mobility.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: ...because access to education and networks are often wealth-dependent
|
Question C: The increasing share of income and wealth among the richest people in a number of advanced countries is a major threat to capitalism.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: ...because unequal access to society's resources may pave the way for populists and extremist parties.
|
Question A: A windfall tax on the excess profits of large oil and gas companies – with the revenue rebated to households – would be an efficient way to provide temporary relief for the average household in European countries from rising energy costs.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Windfall profits in the energy sector and relief for poorer households are two different things that must not be connected directly.
|
Question B: Fiscal measures putting a cap on consumer energy prices would be a more appropriate immediate response to increased inflation in the euro area than raising interest rates.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Strongly Disagree |
8 |
Comment: Thou shall not manipulate market prices, because of adverse allocative consequences. Poorer households may be compensated directly.
|
Stablecoins that are not fully backed by either central bank reserves or government securities with minimal price volatility are inherently vulnerable to runs.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: With positive asset volatility, the 'stable'-claim no longer holds for all creditors. Then, sequencing matters, i.e., a run is possible.
|
High tariffs imposed by the European Union on imports of Russian natural gas would be an effective measure to reduce the flow of revenues to Russia while limiting disruption to supplies to Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: This is a question of tariff incidence; demand for gas is currently price inelastic, revenues for the exporter may thus not fall at all.
|
Rather than using second-round runoffs to settle elections in which no candidate wins a first-round majority, the overall preferences of the electorate would be better reflected by using a single round with ranked-choice voting, in which voters are instructed to rank all of the candidates.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: The ranking procedure may give undue weight to the group of similar-positioned candidates (doubles).
|
Question A:Rising energy prices suggest that the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve will have to increase interest rates faster than they intended to before the invasion.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
8 |
Comment: There are considerations in both directions that may require the ECB to condition an interest move on inflationary dynamics in the summer
|
Question B: Increased public spending by European countries to accommodate larger defense budgets, migration inflows and accelerated investment in alternative energy sources would be better financed mostly through taxes, rather than debt.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
|
Question C: Economic damage from the shock to global commodity markets will fall disproportionately hard on low- and middle-income countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question A:The fallout from the Russian invasion of Ukraine will be stagflationary in that it will noticeably reduce global growth and raise global inflation over the next year.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Consequences of the war go both ways: supply chain and energy prices lower growth, energy substitution and military buildup do the opposite.
|
Question B: The economic and financial sanctions already implemented will lead to a deep recession in Russia.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: While I expect to see a recession because of global pull out from Russia, there are also some counter effects from rising energy revenues.
|
Question C: Targeting the Russian economy through a total ban on oil and gas imports carries a high risk of recession in European economies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Unfortunately, yes. I would nevertheless advocate closing NorthStream1, the existing gas pipeline, and to substitute via renewables.
|
Question D: Weaponizing dollar finance is likely to lead to a significant shift away from the dollar as the dominant international currency.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: This shift away from the dollar is under way already, as weaponizing of finance has become an element in international politics for years.
|
Question A:High volatility in the prices of crypto assets such as Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and Ethereum largely reflects movements in investor sentiment rather than news about potential sources of fundamental value (such as possible applications, or use in illicit transactions).
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Sentiment is more of a stationary variable, which is unlikely to produce price swings regularly.
|
Question B: Given existing regulation of the financial system, as crypto assets grow in value and become more connected to the rest of the system, the fluctuations in their valuations will pose a serious risk to financial stability in advanced economies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: There is a rising risk of contagion into the regulated banking sector if crypto assets become part of the asset universe held by banks.
|
Question C: Private unbacked crypto assets serve no important economic purpose.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: If "important" means 'factual' rather than 'desired', then the answer is yes; it includes betting, informal markets, crime, laundering.
|
Question A:Firms’ incentives to reduce costs by sourcing inputs and products abroad have caused many European industries to become more vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: The question is about the counterfactual. Not clear whether home-sourcing could lead a different class of bottlenecks: simultaneity.
|
Question B: Private firms have inadequate incentives to make investments to reduce the risk that disruptions in the supply of imports will cause shortages and raise domestic prices.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Private firms' incentives depend on expected price sensitivities. As long as prices reflect possible future shortages, firms will react.
|
Question C: Prioritisation of efficiency over resilience in global supply chains makes current disruptions likely to continue beyond 2022.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: I don't see the alleged prioritization of efficiency over resilience. It is a matter expectations, and people learn from past experiences.
|
Question A:Given the centrality of semiconductors to the manufacturing of many products, securing reliable supplies should be a key strategic objective of EU and national policy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
1 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: I interpret the statement in a general way: policy should provide the legal/judicial backup for the fulfillment of private contracts.
|
Question B: Europe’s small role in global semiconductor production is a direct result of insufficient private investment in high-tech innovation.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: There is specialization, and there may be better fields for Europe to specialize in, given path dependency of industrial development.
|
Question C: Public support at EU and national level for investment along the value chain for semiconductors, including production, would be the most effective way to ensure security of supply.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Open markets and encouraging supplier diversification are at least as good.
|
Question A:Even without renewed Covid-19 restrictions, uncertainty about the health threat from the Omicron variant is likely to deliver a significant hit to economic activity from now through the first half of 2022.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Omicron tells us that the pandemic is here to stay for much longer. This should have significant present value effects.
|
Question B: If world vaccine supply continues to be limited, global social welfare would rise by more if those vaccines were made widely available across Africa (with support for effective delivery) rather than accelerating booster vaccinations in rich countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: The if-condition in the statement is important here, for otherwise a strong production effort in Africa would have been a better response.
|
Question C: Imposing travel bans on countries where new Covid-19 variants are discovered will make it less likely that countries will reveal new variants to the rest of the world.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Viruses spread with and without travel bans, I suppose...
|
Question A: Voluntary national targets are unlikely to be an effective mechanism for achieving sharp reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Implemented rules of self-commitment may have an important role model effect, leading to spillovers to other countries.
|
Question B: Agreement on a significant global price floor for all carbon emissions would be an effective step towards achieving sharp reductions in emissions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: ...that looks like a first-best outcome in a second best situation.
|
Question C: Green innovation in the private sector would be strongly stimulated by a substantial increase in public spending on R&D for climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: It all depends on how the spending program is implemented. More centralized investment decisions may lead to less effectiveness.
|
Question A: The introduction of natural experiments to economic analysis of the labor market and related areas has led to a more precise understanding of cause and effect.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Using natural experiments is an intelligent way to build causal inference on the diversity of institutions, shocks and behavior.
|
Question B: The ‘credibility revolution’ in empirical economics has improved our understanding of a number of public policy issues, including education, immigration and the minimum wage.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
|
Question C: In pursuit of credible research designs, researchers often seek good answers instead of good questions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
|
Question A: A mandate for public companies to provide climate-related disclosures (such as their greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint) would provide financially material information that enables investors to make better decisions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Since future regulatory developments are likely to increase the costs of emissions, they affect expected cashflow, and firm value.
|
Question B: A mandate for public companies to provide climate-related disclosures would induce them to reduce their climate impact significantly.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Disclosure may provide incentives for a "run to the median", with some companies issuing/emitting less, and perhaps others issuing more.
|
Question A: The current combination of US fiscal and monetary policy poses a serious risk of prolonged higher inflation.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: The economy is near full capacity which is the time when a slow inflationary process may accelerate unless Fed policy does not counteract.
|
Question B: Current EU and national fiscal policy plans are likely to leave European output below potential a year from now.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Private investments are increasing these days, with a good chance of reducing the so-called output gap to a low value, a year from now.
|
Question A:The introduction of even small trade frictions between neighboring countries can result in significant economic damage, particularly to smaller exporting firms.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
1 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: An example can always be constructed that confirms the statement - the question is whether it generalizes to very generic settings
|
Question B: A national economic boom based on natural resources is likely to harm other sectors of the economy, particularly manufacturing firms.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: It all depends whether or not the other sectors can adjust smoothly to the rise in factor prices driven by the boom in some sectors.
|
Question A: A global minimum corporate tax rate would limit the benefits to companies of shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions without biasing where they invest.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: This is exactly the argument of the proponents - and I think it is correct as a first order effect.
|
Question B: An international tax system in which the major advanced economies set a minimum rate on corporate income is achievable.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: The devil is in the details - as we cam already see from the responses from Ireland, the Bahamas, and the UK.
|
Question C: A global corporate tax system that is based on the location of final consumers would be more efficient than one based on the location of corporate headquarters and production facilities.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: This is a question concerning tax incidence rather than how taxes are being raised (value added, for example).
|
Question A: Under a fixed exchange rate and fully liberalized capital flows, a country loses domestic control of monetary policy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: The statement is true to a certain degree only. Therefore, MP still has impact albeit less than under a flexible exchange rate system.
|
Question B: For emerging and developing economies open to the world capital market, a flexible exchange rate confers little advantage over a pegged exchange rate in terms of economic stability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: In this generality, the statement is wrong. Eventually it all depends on the underlying economic policy pursued.
|
Question C: The key feature making the US a more natural optimum currency area than the euro area is higher labor mobility.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
8 |
Comment: The comparison between US and Euro area misses out on the key point, that defines OCA: the fiscal and political unity.
|
Question A: Reliable Covid-19 vaccines will reach developing countries more quickly if the rich countries pay the pharmaceutical companies at prevailing prices to manufacture and distribute the vaccines (or to license production and support licensees), rather than waiving patent protection.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Waiving patent laws this time will weaken patent laws at other times.
|
Question B: The benefits to the US, Canada, Europe, Japan and other rich countries of paying for 12 billion doses of Covid vaccines at prevailing prices and providing them for free to the rest of the world exceed the costs that the rich countries would incur.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: This would be a transfer with very large social rate of return - and with a high economic rate of return as well.
|
Question A: The Bank for International Settlements defines a central bank digital currency as follows: ‘In simple terms, a central bank digital currency (CBDC) would be a digital banknote. It could be used by individuals to pay businesses, shops or each other (a 'retail CBDC'), or between financial institutions to settle trades in financial markets (a ‘wholesale CBDC').For developed countries, a central bank digital currency that is available to the public at large would offer social benefits that exceed the associated costs or risks.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
9 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Critical issues: what role for digital currencies in competition with crypto currencies, what is impact on banking industry?
|
Question B: Central banks that do not introduce their own digital money risk losing the ability to conduct effective monetary policy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: The answer depends on whether or not digitalization of a currency is a necessary condition to maintain the role of government-backed monies.
|
Question C: The introduction of a central bank digital currency is unlikely to have major effects on the economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: As before, it will have an effect if it turns the table in the competition between state and private (crypto) monies.
|
Question A: Removing intellectual property protections on Covid-19 vaccines would substantially improve availability of the vaccines in developing countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Since avoiding a long-lasting Covid economic crisis in developing countries is in developed countries own interest, jabs will be provided.
|
Question B: Removing intellectual property protections on Covid-19 vaccines would have a negative impact on vaccine development efforts for future variants of SARS-CoV-2 or for the next pandemic.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Like this time, the breakthrough is likeley to come from small, start-up institutions, like BionTech (Mainz) or Curavec (Tübingen).
|
Question C: Without an international agreement that facilitates vaccine trade, countries’ incentives to limit exports of vaccines and/or key production inputs are likely to prolong the adverse effects of the pandemic in advanced countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question A: Allowing short selling of financial securities, such as stocks and government bonds, leads to prices that, on average, are closer to their fundamental values.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: If short sellers push stocks away from fundamentals, investor tend to search for facts, and may build up "repairing" counter positions.
|
Question B: Requiring investors to disclose short positions in a stock at the equivalent threshold as they are required to do for long positions would result in significantly less short selling.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Limits on long positions in stocks are far larger than typical short positions taken by individual investors. Thus, they are not binding.
|
Question C: Regulatory restrictions on short selling - such as no naked shorts, temporary bans in times of crisis - make it difficult for optimists and pessimists to have equal influence on asset prices.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: That's exactly the point of discussion in the Wirecard case.
|
Question A: EU Covid-19 vaccination efforts are significantly behind those of Israel, Serbia, the UK and the US.Offering substantially higher prices per dose would have resulted in larger capacity investments by vaccine makers and accelerated distribution in Europe significantly.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: It is as simple as that. Note that equity-like co-investments in such facilities would have been even better, overcoming risk aversion.
|
Question B: In the current situation, paying for more production capacity would be better than offering higher prices for vaccines.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: Both should work together. Ultimately, fast inventors have to benefit.
|
Question C: If the EU started paying prices above 100 euros per dose, it would on net reduce the cost of the pandemic to the EU via more lives saved and shorter lockdowns.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: The higher price goes into the right direction - ultimately different cost and benefit effects have to be aggregated.
|
Question A: Policies that aim to reduce obesity by increasing incentives for physical activity would be more welfare-improving than policies that increase the financial costs of consuming calories.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Disagree |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Heavy consumers (of food leading to obesity) are not always practicing physical exercise - so relative price change has a stronger effect.
|
Question B: A ban on advertising junk foods (those that are high in sugar, salt and fat) would be an effective policy to reduce child obesity.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: Unclear whether ads are the main driver of consumption...
|
Question C: Setting targets for schools to reduce obesity (e.g. by diverting financial resources to improve school meals or add cookery to the curriculum) would reduce social welfare because schools in deprived areas, where obesity is higher, are already struggling to deliver the core curriculum.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Too many unintended side-effects, like discrimination accusation or defiance. In any case, there should be extra money, not substitution.
|
Question A: The current US federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour. States can choose whether to have a higher minimum - and many do.
A federal minimum wage of $15 per hour would lower employment for low-wage workers in many states.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: The counter effect to higher wage for low income people is higher training or job-related equipment to make those people more productive.
|
Question B: A federal minimum wage that is pegged to state and/or local conditions such as the cost of living would be preferable to the current arrangements that give states a role in setting the policy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Uniform minimum wage tends to balance living conditions across regions - which may have desired re-distributional effects across states.
|
Question A: The UK economy is likely to be at least several percentage points smaller in 2030 than it would have been if the country had remained in the European Union.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: It all depends on the extent to which the UK will pursue a beggar-thy-neighbor policy, basically free-riding or arbitraging on the EU.
|
Question B: The aggregate economy of the 27 countries still in the EU is likely to be at least several percentage points smaller in 2030 than if the UK had not left.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: UK's EU membership produced positive externalities, concerning goods & services, but also w.r.t. the broader policy decisions taken.
|
Requiring Facebook to divest WhatsApp and Instagram is likely to make society better off.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: The two major elements in restoring consumer sovereignty are: strong(er) data protection rights, and competition in the use of data.
|
Question A: Our understanding of labor productivity has been much enhanced by accounting for monetary and promotion-based incentives within firms and related selection effects.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
No Opinion |
Agree |
6 |
|
|
Question B: Large salaries for senior business executives are less a reflection of an individual’s current contribution to a firm’s overall performance than a ‘prize’ for those who put in the effort to achieve one of the top positions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Uncertain |
5 |
|
Question A: A wealth tax would be an effective way to reduce inequality.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: A wealth tax will lower inequality only if the resulting wealth transfer/tax avoidance activities do not outweigh the intended effect.
|
Question B: A wealth tax in a form discussed in the UK (where individuals could be taxed a percentage of their net worth over £750,000, excluding any personal pension savings and their main home) would be an effective way to improve public finances after the Covid-19 crisis.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
7 |
|
Question C: A public policy goal that could be accomplished with a well-enforced wealth tax could be accomplished at lower cost with modifications to existing taxes, such as income tax, capital gains tax, inheritance tax and property tax.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Uncertain |
6 |
|
Question A: Google's dominance of the market for internet search arose mainly from a combination of economies of scale and a quality algorithm.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question B: In light of Google’s dominance, its current operating practices could have a substantial negative effect on social welfare in the long run.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
|
Question C: The nature of the market dominance of technology giants in the digital economy warrants either the imposition of some kind of regulation or a fundamental change in antitrust policy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
|
The practical application of auction theory to the licensing of rights to use public assets like radiospectrum and other natural resources has generated substantially higher government revenues and better allocative efficiency worldwide than would have happened under previous arrangements.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Agree |
8 |
|
|
Strong competition from foreign producers is likely to encourage greater private sector expenditure on research and development in the home market.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Uncertain |
7 |
|
|
Question A: The ECB should aim to achieve an inflation rate that averages 2% over time.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
8 |
Comment: Since in monetary policy credibility is king, the ECB should not change but rather hold on to its inherited objective.
|
Question B:The ECB should take account of the environmental implications of its policy decisions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Disagree |
7 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Recall Tinbergen: one policy instrument per objective. Keep monetary policy for inflation targeting, use Ordnungspolitik otherwise.
|
Question C: The objectives set for the ECB by Treaty should make maximum sustainable employment of equal importance as price stability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Treaty is wise and respects Tinbergen rule. If you want more employment, use fiscal measures or, again, a better Ordnungspolitik.
|
Question A: Right now, the central focus of fiscal policy should be on temporary measures to provide protection and promote rapid economic recovery rather than trying to advance other objectives, such as reducing debt, tackling climate change or addressing inequality.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: "Agree", yes, it should be the central focus. BUT given that these measure have secondary effects anyway, they need attention as well.
|
Question B: Cutting taxes on firms (or delaying tax collection) will allow more of them to survive and be more effective than public spending for triggering a rapid economic recovery.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Tax reductions, particularly in the form of loss carry backwards to firms over several years, provide protection and boost the recovery.
|
Question C: European recovery fund disbursements to crisis-hit countries should be primarily in the form of grants rather than loans.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Definitely not in the form of loans. Grants are better - but combined with dividends, as proposed by SAFE, the Pandemic Equity Fund, excel.
-see background information here |
Question D: European recovery fund disbursements to crisis-hit countries should not be made on condition of commitments to reform by recipients.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Disagree |
8 |
Comment: In some countries, the inner politics are road-blocked. Relief can only come from outside conditionality... In such cases, I am in favor.
|
Question A: Given the social and regulatory pressures to keep prices down for drugs and vaccines to treat Covid-19, the financial incentives for pharmaceutical companies to invest in such products are below the value of the investment to society.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: There is a trade-off between restricted prices on one side and government assisted, eased market access - and thus: volume on the other side
|
Question B: Government commitments to pay developers and manufacturers above average costs for an effective vaccine or drug treatments for Covid-19 would accelerate production.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Higher rents leads to higher competition among producers, increased politcal lobbying - and hence slower decision and production processes.
|
Question C: Given the positive externalities from vaccination, an effective Covid-19 vaccine should have priority in public healthcare funding even in countries where other diseases cause more death and disability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: What matters in this decision problem is the extent to which drugs have externalities - Covid drugs may or may not excel on this metric.
|
Question A: Political conflict plays a key role in shaping economic decisions, policies and outcomes.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Evident...
|
Question B: Most European countries have larger social welfare systems than the United States in part because the latter is more heterogeneous by race and ethnicity.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
|
Question A: Clearing the market for surgical face masks using prices is detrimental to the public good.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: As there are strong externalities involved, e.g. in hospital personnel, the usual allocational efficiency arguments do not apply fully.
|
Question B: Laws to prevent high prices for essential goods in short supply in a crisis would raise social welfare.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Price ceilings would deter production, without necessary implications for allocation, hence ceilings will lead to welfare losses.
|
Question C: Governments should buy essential medical supplies at what would have been the market price and redistribute according to need rather than ability to pay.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: That is a way to ridge the gap between efficiency and a more broadly defined concept of welfare.
|
Question A: Economic damage from the virus and lockdowns will ultimately fall disproportionately hard on low- and middle-income countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: One factor will be the degree of coordination of national rescue programs. The less coordinated, the worse. At EU level, and globally.
|
Question B: A temporary standstill on sovereign debt payments by low- and middle-income countries to all official and private creditors to give those countries space to cover the immediate costs of the crisis would benefit advanced economies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Would create all sorts of trouble, arbitrage opportunities, and a worsening of financing conditions without solving the debt overhang.
|
Question C: Export restrictions on food and medical supplies, and other protectionist measures, are likely to cost lives and slow economic recovery in all countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: All depends on allocation of production capacities and output inventories among countries at the moment when the restrictions are imposed.
|
Question A: Government support to private firms in the form of debt (either directly or with the help of public guarantees) is desirable, but risks leaving them with too much leverage to invest and grow in the future.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Debt overhang is a major problem in this crisis - as an earnings shortfall needs to be bridged. Adding debt may prove self-defeating.
-see background information here |
Question B: Providing funds to viable businesses in the form of equity injections is a vital complement to debt support.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: The pandemic crisis has pushed companies across Europe deeply into debt overhang-waters - equity-type is therefore an adequate response.
|
Question C: With the EU ban on state aid suspended, government capital injections should be provided via a newly created pan-European equity fund, rather than be left to national governments acting independently.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: The pan-European nature levels the "playing" field, and creates --via the Fund-- a common interest in the prosperity of Europe as a whole.
|
Question A:Even with the support policies implemented by European governments in response to the crisis, low-income workers will suffer a relatively bigger hit to their incomes than those further up the distribution.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: The answer must be country-specific. E.g., Germany has automatic stabilizers, like Kurzarbeit, making small entrepreneurs the main losers.
|
Question B: With schools across Europe closed in the lockdown, existing gaps in access to quality education between high- and low-income households will be exacerbated.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Again, country-specific access to quality education is not the problem, but family support in using the access - which is income-related.
|
Question C: Combating the effects of the pandemic on inequality should be a priority for policy interventions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: No. The widening gap of competitivity between Europe's north and south, resulting from huge differences in aid programs, needs attention.
|
Question A: Severe lockdowns – including closing non-essential businesses and strict limitations on people’s movement – are likely to be better for the economy in the medium term than less aggressive measures.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Given a situation of radical uncertainty with slow Bayesian updating on pandemic fundamentals, a maxmin strategy suggests tough action early
|
Question B: While national governments have responded to the crisis with substantial economic policy measures, a joint euro area fiscal response is still highly desirable.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
9 |
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Comment: Without a coordinated European answer, the crisis may spill into the banking sector, and also to sovereign risk - endangering the Eurozone
-see background information here |
Question C: Given the willingness of the European Central Bank to buy sovereign bonds, including Italian bonds, without limits, there is no need for ‘coronabonds’.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
7 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: The ECB can't do miracles. Rather, we must invent a better instrument than Corona-bonds - that avoids its traps and convinces its critics.
|
Question A: Even if the mortality of COVID-19 proves to be limited (similar to the number of flu deaths in a regular season), it is likely to cause a major recession.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Agree |
7 |
|
|
Question B: The economic effects of COVID-19 coming from reduced spending will be larger than those coming from disruptions to supply chains and illness-related workforce reductions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Uncertain |
6 |
|
|
Question C: The economic policy institutions of the Eurozone are well equipped to ameliorate the potential economic damage from COVID-19.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Disagree |
7 |
|
|
Question A: Germany's current account surplus is undesirable even from a purely German viewpoint: the country would be better off if, for example, it ran a smaller primary surplus, in turn leading to a smaller current account surplus.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: If the EU is one economy, some countries will always run a surplus/deficit; there is no point in balancing the current account by country.
|
Question B: The Eurozone would be in better shape if fiscal policy were more expansionary, which would allow monetary policy to be slightly less so.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: There are pros and cons, as some countries have hard-to sustain government debt levels, others not. Thus, a case by case analysis is needed.
|
Question C: If there is a recession in the Eurozone, it will be essential to have a coordinated fiscal expansion.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Fiscal policies in the Eurozone are by and large regional/national decisions, so coordination may be either not justified, or not needed.
|
Question A: The European Union goal of reaching net zero emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050 will be a major drag on economic growth.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: The policy will require significant public and private investments, allowing for knock-on effects that are likely to spur growth.
|
Question B: Carbon taxes are a better way to implement climate policy than cap-and-trade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: The big difference is the "cap" - without it, taxes may distort investment and consumption, but will not necessarily reduce emissions.
|
Question C: A carbon border tax targeting imports from non-EU countries with less strict climate policies is likely to harm developing economies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: The question leaves open whether or not the border tax is accompanied by higher levies for CO2 production within borders.
|
Question A: Following the UK election result, the certainty that the country is going to leave the European Union will provide a substantial short-term boost to the UK economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: The demise of the "fork" (in versus out) reduces ambiguity greatly, allowing longer term planning once again.
|
Question B: Given that the transition period currently expires at the end of 2020, there is still a considerable risk that the UK will leave the European Union without a trade agreement.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: I don't thing that the EU on the other side of the table will play hard ball - they will rather give in, allowing for a trade arrangement.
|
Question C: Leaving the European Union without a trade agreement would have a large negative impact on the UK economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: This is too complicated a case to think it through properly now.
|
Question A: Under current policies on climate change, the associated physical risks (such as those arising from total seasonal rainfall and sea level changes, and increased frequency, severity, and correlation of extreme weather events) will be at most a very small factor in monetary policy decisions over the next decade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: The answer is "uncertain", because I fear political pressure combined with central bank hubris may lead to action based on a false positive
|
Question B: The physical risks associated with climate change under current policies are likely to threaten financial stability over the next decade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
|
Question A: Europeans would benefit more from an extra €1 billion of public R&D spent through existing (public) channels than from an extra €1 billion of private R&D spent through existing (private) channels, all else equal.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: I believe in the direct plus indirect benefit of basic research, which is more likely to be public rather than private R&D.
|
Question B: Europeans would benefit more from an extra €1 billion of public medical research spent through existing (public) channels than from an extra €1 billion of private medical research spent through existing (private) channels, all else equal.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Public R&D may have positive second round effects in the form of private R&D, whereas the opposite is less likely to happen.
|
Question A: Randomized control trials are a valuable tool for answering some long unsettled questions in development economics research.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: This is an overall YES, because it addresses directly the identification problem, thereby hinting at effective policy instruments.
|
Question B: Randomized control trials are a valuable tool for making significant progress in poverty reduction.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: The fact that I learn something about causality does not imply implementing isolated changes (of instruments) in the real world is easy.
|
Question A: Having companies run to maximize shareholder value creates significant negative externalities for workers and communities.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: There is a route to maximizing shareholder value while simultaneously upholding stakeholder utility: That is German Ordnungspolitik.
|
Question B: Appropriately managed corporations could create significantly greater value than they currently do for a range of stakeholders – including workers, suppliers, customers and community members – with small impacts on shareholder value.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: In its generality, the statement is hard to disagree with...
|
Question C:Effective mechanisms for boards of directors to ensure that CEOs act in ways that balance the interests of all stakeholders would be straightforward to introduce.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Long term profitability will not be maximized when other stakeholders' interests are manifestly violated.
|
Question A:Rising inequality is straining the health of liberal democracy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Not inequality per se undermines democracy, but the degree to which being rich or poor becomes hereditary.
|
Question B: Enacting more redistributive expenditures and policies would be likely to limit the rise of populism in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Populism - as today's new nationalism - is driven by doubts about future living standard and way of life, rather than inequality at home.
|
Question C: European governments should allocate more resources to policies that would be likely to limit the rise of populism in Europe, even if it means higher public debt or lower public spending in other areas.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Fighting populism-nationalism needs bold decisions promoting a sense of relevance and pride for European politics. That is no spending issue
|
Question A:At this point, there is little that the European Central Bank can do to increase or maintain output in the Eurozone.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: The ECB can influence output via interest rates if and only if the investment function is monotonic everywhere. But this may not be true.
|
Question B: When the economy is operating below its potential, larger fiscal deficits are likely to increase demand and output.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: There are two caveats in the statement: first, output is below potential, and second, Ricardian equivalence does not hold.
|
Question C: When the economy is operating below its potential and monetary policy is at the effective lower bound, fiscal policy should prioritize increasing output over decreasing public debt.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: I disagree because of unconditional nature of the statement. What if Ricardian equivalence holds, and investment function bends backwards?
|
Question A:Selecting candidates for membership of the ECB Executive Board based primarily on nationality ahead of competence is likely to have a negative effect on the quality of monetary policy in the Eurozone.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Yes, a negative influence is possible because national elctorates may believe "their" agent will bias his/her decisions.
|
Question B: Although the central bank can never be an entirely technocratic institution, the selection process for the ECB President and members of the Executive Board is significantly worsened by intergovernmental trade-offs involving appointments to other European institutions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: The phrase overstates the effective influence of trade-offs. An appointment balance may help to achieve mutual recognition, given quality.
|
On bids for infrastructure projects, the average European would be better off if Europe’s governments favored European firms over Chinese firms (or firms from any other country with non-profit-related geopolitical strategies) — even if it means sometimes choosing a higher-cost bidder.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: The response to geopolitical interests is a wise strong set of conditionalities if awarded, rather than exclusion from the bidding process.
|
Question A: Breaking the “doom loop” — a negative spiral that can result when banks hold sovereign bonds and governments bail out banks — would increase the stability of European economies in the event of another financial crisis.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: In the Eurozone, banks' home bias creates bankruptcy risk because states cannot print the money needed to redeem their debt.
|
Question B: Regulators should try to break the doom loop by assigning positive risk weights — in calculating banks’ capital requirements — to banks’ holdings of domestic and other Eurozone sovereign bonds.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: I only weakly agree, because there are second order effects of risk weights, and there are better alternatives, like concentration limits.
|
Question C: Breaking the doom loop would impose substantial costs on powerful political constituencies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
8 |
Comment: Second order (political) effects of changing risk weights are only poorly understood.
|
Residents of big European cities would be better off, on balance, if governments did more to counter gentrification, for example by using rent and other housing subsidies, public housing investments, zoning regulations, or similar policies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Too homogeneous a neighborhood in inner cities, as wel as in "les banlieues", may undermine cohesion and solidarity in society at large.
|
Question A: A common European deposit insurance scheme, once fully implemented, would increase the stability of European economies in the event of another financial crisis.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: “Fully implemented” implies implementation in a way that minimizes moral hazard, e.g. through a European reinsurance scheme.
|
Question B: A common European deposit insurance scheme, once fully implemented, would increase the likelihood of another financial crisis in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Strongly Disagree |
8 |
Comment: No, it would not iprovided it is implemented cleverly, e.g. relying on a reinsurance scheme.
|
Question A: Overall, public spending on the arts in Europe creates benefits that exceed the deadweight loss caused by taxation to fund it.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Clearly, the statement is subject to decreasing marginal returns, so the optimal amount of spending is finite.
|
Question B: Additional public spending on the arts in Europe would create incremental benefits that exceed the deadweight loss caused by taxation to fund it.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Given the high level of public spending on the arts in Europe, we may have reached the point of negative marginal returns in some countries.
|
Question A: The average European is better off if Europe’s competition authorities let firms merge into European champions in their sectors, even it weakens competition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: There are pros and cons, and I do not see easily how to weigh these arguments...
|
Question B: If China and other countries use policies that create giant international firms, then the average European is better off if Europe's competition authorities let firms merge into European champions in their sectors, even it weakens competition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Disagree |
6 |
|
Question A: Letting publicly traded European firms report earnings annually rather than quarterly would lead their executives to place more weight on long-term issues in their investments and other decisions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: The point is that Board-level brain-time needed to justify volatile results is reduced to an -arguably- more reasonable time span.
|
Question B: A switch from quarterly to annual earnings reports would, on net, benefit shareholders of European firms.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Board-level brain time is redirected to longer horizons - which on balance may benefit shareholders.
|
Question A: To the extent that public corporations pursue social and environmental initiatives, they tend to achieve higher risk-adjusted (private) returns than otherwise similar corporations that pursue such initiatives less.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: It is an unlikely combination, doing good and having private benefits too.
|
Question B: To the extent that Norway’s global government pension fund makes investments for social and environmental objectives — apart from investments that would bring the highest expected risk-adjusted returns — it improves the welfare of Norwegians.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: There is an emotional benefit in pursuing such an investment stratategy that may be relevant here.
|
Question A: The fiscal rules of the European Union should give more flexibility to member countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: The rule itself should be rock-solid, the user should herself select the buffers required to achieve the desired degree of flexibility.
|
Question B: The Italian budget for 2019 that the European Commission rejected in October would have increased Italy’s risk of fiscal insolvency substantially.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: It increasese default probability through its indirect effect on future debt incentives; while the direct effect may be negligible.
|
Question C: If France runs a 2019 budget deficit of around 3.4% of GDP, as announced by President Macron’s government, France’s risk of fiscal insolvency will increase substantially.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: As in the case of Italy, rule-breaking carries the risk of repetition, although to a lessor extent for France.
|
Question A: Capping the number of ride-sharing drivers as is being discussed in New York City, Chicago and London will make the average resident in that city worse off.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Too many side and cross effects to consider in order to arrive at a "safe" welfare conclusion.
|
Question B:To achieve a given level of congestion, it would be better to use taxes for driving that vary based on the level of congestion, rather than limiting the number of ride-sharing vehicles.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: The marginal cost of adding or subtracting vehicles instantly, according to traffic status, is lower with ride-sharers than with cabs.
|
People who migrated to Europe between 2015 and 2018 are likely — over the next two decades — to contribute more in taxes paid than they receive in benefits and public services.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: As employment rate among migrants goes up over time, and much of taxation is indirect anyway, chances are that the statement comes true.
|
Ideas are nonrival, so increasing returns to scale is an essential feature of technological change in a market economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Voters overestimate the effect that current governments have on their economies’ concurrent economic performance.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Often, in public debate, external forces and uncontrolled markets are blamed for poor economic performance, not true own political omissions
|
Over the next decade, autonomous cars will raise average welfare in the EU by at least as much as smartphones have over the past decade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Autonomous cars are relevant for urban areas, whereas smartphones have affected the life of almost everybody, thus a larger welfare effect.
|
Britain’s Labour party recently proposed giving the Bank of England a target of 3% annual labor productivity growth. Consider the following statement:Central banks cannot significantly increase productivity growth over a ten year horizon, except perhaps by promoting macroeconomic stability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Quite an absurd suggestion, vastly overestimating what monetary policy can achieve - in the end frustrating central bankers and the public.
|
Question A: The European Commission has proposed new rules to ensure that “digital business activities are taxed in a fair and growth-friendly way in the EU”. Consider two statements regarding this proposal:An EU-wide 3% tax on revenue from digital activities would, on balance, be a good idea.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
7 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: A "fair" digital tax should allocate the tax base (profits) virtually among producer and consumer countries; a 3% tax may start negotiations
|
Question B:If the EU decides to tax digital service providers, it would be better — given the difficulties of measuring and verifying digital activity — to tax them on the revenue, rather than the profits, that they generate locally.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Yes, but profit taxation requires negotiations between countries to share the tax base (unlikely to work in todays protectionist world)
|
The European Union often uses its antitrust powers to protect EU-based firms from international competition, rather than to promote greater competition in European markets.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Strongly Disagree |
6 |
Comment: A generalized answer to this question needs to be specify a particular industry. In banking I do not agree, in others I don't know enough.
|
Question A: Trade with China makes most Europeans better off because, among other advantages, they can buy goods that are made or assembled more cheaply in China.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Trade with China, as with other countries, is of a reciprocal nature, and it helps Europeans (and Chinese) in consumption and employment.
|
Question B: Some Europeans who work in the production of competing goods, such as clothing and furniture, are made worse off by trade with China.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: This statement is in a way a no-brainer. But it begs the question whether it does not also help affected European producers to find a niche.
|
Question C: If the EU followed the new US steel tariffs by imposing similar EU tariffs on steel from China, it would improve Europeans’ welfare.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Disagree |
6 |
Strongly Disagree |
7 |
Comment: I do not believe in strategic trade policy as an instrument of welfare improvement: European and Chinese welfare are not substitutes.
|
Question A: Assuming it exits its third bailout program this summer without an immediate restructuring or other debt relief, Greece is unlikely to default on its sovereign debt in the coming decade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Greece is now back on track, has accepted many hardships in order to comply with European requests - why should it change its stance?
|
Question B: Greece would be better off if it had decided to exit the euro between 2011 and 2015.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Disagree |
7 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Exiting a currency union is tough. Lots of international exposures will be in default, because of the extreme devaluation.
|
Question C: If Greece had defaulted on (or restructured) its private debt in 2010, while also staying within the euro, that combination would have been better for Greece than either exiting the euro or proceeding as it has actually done.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: The default-in-2010 option would have been close to Banking Union rules: Bail-in creditors - which at the time were mostly foreign banks
|
Question A: Bitcoins are more similar to gold than they are to currency.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Disagree |
6 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: A bitcoin is a private bet on becoming a (public) legal tender, and on earning the seignorage.
|
Question B: Bitcoins are more similar to gold than they are to Dutch tulips in the 1630s.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Again, tulips had developed into a mutually accepted expression of value, and bulbs were seen as the key (algorithm) to replication/mining.
|
The US spends roughly 17% of GDP on healthcare, according to the OECD; most European countries spend less than 12% of GDP.
Higher quality-adjusted US healthcare prices contribute relatively more to the extra US spending than does the combination of higher quantity and quality of US care (interpreting quantity and quality to reflect both greater American healthcare needs due to underlying population health and the delivery of more or better healthcare services to Americans).
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
No Opinion |
Uncertain |
6 |
|
|
Over the past two years, all else equal, the appeal of the US as a destination for immigrants has changed in ways that will likely decrease innovation in the US economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: I know a few excellent students who in earlier years would have applied for a top US school, and who now prefer to stay in Europe.
|
Question A:Holding other policies fixed, the average European would be better off if every European country taxed corporate profits at a rate of 20% (based as closely as possible on a common definition of profits).
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: The effect of lower tax rate on average income is probably stronger than that of lower taxable income (given concurrent US-tax reduction).
|
Question B: If other policies were held fixed and every European country taxed corporate profits at a common rate of 20%, then reducing that common rate substantially below 20% would make the average European better off.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Disagree |
1 |
Strongly Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Same as before.
|
Question A: All else equal, if corporations throughout Europe set quotas for a minimum number of women board members, the shareholder value of European companies would increase.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Even if more women on boards meant better decisions, the effect on shareholder value in general equilibrium is likely non-positive.
|
Question B: Taking into account the likely effects on investments in human capital by men and women, setting quotas throughout Europe for a minimum number of women board members would generate substantial net benefits for Europeans.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: The sum of two marginal effects - one positive (women), the other negative (men) - is likely to be positive in this case.
|
Question A: Subsidizing renewable energy sources is better than taxing fossil fuels, assuming the subsidy or tax would be set at levels that would reduce carbon emissions by an equivalent amount.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Disagree |
6 |
|
Question B: Germany’s solar-energy subsidies to date have produced net social benefits for Germany.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Disagree |
5 |
|
Question C: Solar-energy subsidies to date in Germany and other countries have produced net social benefits for the world.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
|
Insights from psychology about individual behavior – examples of which include limited rationality, low self-control, or a taste for fairness – predict several important types of observed market outcomes that fully-rational economic models do not.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: while I see the impact of nudging on macro outcomes (e.g. pension fund participation), I am uncertain whether this is due to irrationality.
|
The influx of refugees into Germany beginning in the summer of 2015 will generate net economic benefits for German citizens over the succeeding decade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
9 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Direct effects likely negative, while indirect effects -ranging from fiscal stimuli to change in immigration policy- likely positive. Sum=?
|
Question A: Holding labor market institutions and job training fixed, rising use of robots and artificial intelligence is likely to increase substantially the number of workers in advanced countries who are unemployed for long periods.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: We will see lots of changes, not only robots coming in. But also very different ways of working, leading also to shorter employment spells.
|
Question B: Rising use of robots and artificial intelligence in advanced countries is likely to create benefits large enough that they could be used to compensate those workers who are substantially negatively affected for their lost wages.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Absolutely. But mind the term "could". Whether or not it happens depends critically on fundamental adjustments of our societal architecture.
|
Question A: Consumers will be better off, on balance, if European cities treat firms that provide ride-sharing platforms (such as Uber) as substantively different from taxi firms, and thus not necessarily warranting the same regulation.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Exempting ride sharing services from existing regulations would put taxi firms at an imposed disadvantage, undermining efficiency.
|
Question B: Assuming that taxi and ride-sharing companies were treated as substantively similar — including requirements that they operate on an equal footing regarding safety, insurance and taxation — letting ride-sharing services compete without restrictions on prices or routes would raise consumer welfare.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question C: Regardless of how ride-sharing services are treated, existing regulations for traditional taxi firms in many European cities harm consumers by limiting competition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Welfare is affected by two effects, reduced competition (a minus), and increased safety/reliability (a plus). The sum is thus indeterminate.
|
Question A: Revising France’s labor market policies — by reducing employment protection, decentralizing labor negotiations to the firm level, and making training programs more accessible and responsive to labor demands — would, all else equal, increase productivity in France’s economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: The second policy option in the list (decentralized labor negotiations) may backfire, boosting strike incentives and lowering productivity.
|
Question B: Reducing employment protection would reduce the equilibrium unemployment rate in France.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: I only note in passing that the relationship between equilibrium unemployment rate and welfare is likely to be non-monotonic.
|
Question A: The ECB's asset purchases over the past two years have reduced the threat of deflation in the euro area as a whole.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: APP has desired real effects iff credit supply is the problem, not demand, nor structural reform. Moreover, is mild deflation a threat?
|
Question B: If the economic outlook in the euro area becomes less favorable, then increasing the ECB's asset purchase program (in size or duration) would substantially increase the euro area's economic growth over the following five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: APP may have opposite effect: Expectations of unsustainable debt levels at states and banks leading to low interest rates & low growth.
|
In general, absent any inside information, an equity investor can expect to do better by holding a well-diversified, low-fee, passive index fund than by holding a few stocks.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Strongly Agree |
9 |
Comment: A quant hedge fund may extract extra return by big data strategies, but an average guy, like myself, will likely fail with stock-picking.
|
Question A: Without changes in policy, a rising share of people who are over age 65 will exert a substantial downward influence on per capita real GDP in western European countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: The emphasis is on "without change in policy" - but it is those changes that will weigh heavily on the policy agenda, e.g. retirement age.
|
Question B: In European countries where the share of those over 65 is rising, there are net social benefits to adjusting retirement ages for state-financed (including pay-as-you-go) pension systems upwards, so that revised retirement ages better reflect longer life expectancies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Increasing retirement age will go hand in hand with changing work conditions. As a consequence, productivity of elderly is likely to rise.
|
Question A: All else equal, there are substantial advantages to having much of Europe’s human capital and infrastructure for international financial activity clustered in a single city, as they are at present in London.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
8 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: For hub-and-spoke structure, we need to balance agglomeration synergy against systemic risk externality (created at hub, borne by spokes).
-see background information here |
Question B: All else equal, Britain’s rules on hiring, firing and working hours are significantly more conducive to financial activity than those in other large European countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: For non-tariff employees, income tax law and conducive (friendly) regulatory policies are way more important than hiring and firing rules.
|
Question A: Setting the EU rules aside, and assuming it would take 2.5% of Italy’s GDP to recapitalize its banks, the Italian government would improve financial stability in Europe if it injected this amount of public funds into its banks.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
10 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Inject all capital into strong banks, not weak ones, thus restructuring and scaling down the entire sector. Good plan, but will not happen.
|
Question B: If Italy were to inject public funds into its banks without imposing losses on at least some claimants, an important cost would be the effect on future incentives (economic or political) in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
9 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Europe's new regulatory architecture aims for market discipline through bail-inability of equity and junior debt. US pursues different model
-see background information here |
Question A: Because of the Brexit vote's outcome, the UK's real per-capita income level is likely to be lower a decade from now than it would have been otherwise.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Think of the EU as a collective good with some redistributive features. Strong countries that separate leave tab on the table for remainers.
|
Question B: Because of the Brexit vote's outcome, the rest of the EU's real per-capita income level is likely to be lower a decade from now than it would have been otherwise.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: As the UK leaves, an advocate of markets and free competition departs - with negative consequences for the rest of the EU.
|
In general, using more congestion charges in crowded transportation networks — such as higher tolls during peak travel times in cities, and peak fees for airplane takeoff and landing slots — and using the proceeds to lower other taxes would make citizens on average better off.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
7 |
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Comment: Note that crowdedness is endogenous, and an allocation of proceeds to all citizens (rather than other transportation users) is third best.
|
On the whole, the shift from state to private ownership of many industrial assets in central and eastern European countries after communism has increased productivity in those countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Comment: While productivity has increased almost surely, production may actually have dropped significantly, as industry was largely dismantled.
|
Question A: Freer movement of goods and services across borders within Europe has made the average western European citizen better off since the 1980s.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Comment: Citizens, not workers or consumers are evaluated. Gains from trade have probably increased in terms of averaging across Europeans.
|
Question B: Freer movement of goods and services across borders within Europe has made many low-skilled western European citizens worse off since the 1980s.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Gains from trade have increased the extent to which redistribution via the social security system can be effective.
|
Question A: Giving tax incentives to specific firms to locate operations in a country typically generates domestic benefits that outweigh the costs to the country providing the incentives.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: While benefits are consummated locally, negative externalities and allocative distortions are largely outside the country.
|
Question B: Europe as a whole benefits when European cities or countries compete with each other by giving tax incentives to firms to locate operations in their jurisdictions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Compare innovation and competition (pro) with rent seeking and allocative distortions (contra). For Europe, the "contra" argument dominates.
|
Question A: Freer movement of people to live and work across borders within Europe has made the average western European citizen better off since the 1980s.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Welfare comparisons are hard to substantiate. Moreover, note the identification problem: EU trade and migration happened simultaneously.
|
Question B: Freer movement of people to live and work across borders within Europe has made many low-skilled western European citizens worse off since the 1980s.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Freer migration has increased GDP, and thus has raised transfers to lower-skilled people. The balance, I believe (!), may well be positive.
|