About
- Joseph Sondheimer Professor of International Economics, Finance and Accounting
- Co-director of the Initiative on Global Markets (2009-2019)
- Humboldt Research Award (2012)
- Editor of the Journal of Accounting Research (2011-present)
- Fellow of the European Corporate Governance Institute (since 2014) and NBER Research Associate (since 2008)
Voting History
Question A: The reductions in Western programs of development assistance will have no measurable effects on GDP growth in the recipient countries over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: There is evidence that foreign aid can have a positive impact on economic
growth and hence reductions would likely have negative effect. Evidence is not entirely conclusive (due to selection issues) and depends on recipient country institutions and the type of aid.
|
Question B: The reductions in Western programs of development assistance will have substantially negative effects on the most vulnerable people in the recipient countries over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Whenever foreign aid is effective at directing funds to those most in need, this statement should be true.
|
Question C: Development assistance motivated by the potential benefits for the donors in terms of prosperity and security is measurably more effective in promoting GDP growth in recipient countries than aid based on humanitarian or other moral principles.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Disagree |
5 |
|
Question A: Matching US import tariffs to the tariffs, value-added taxes and non-tariff barriers imposed on US goods by other countries would substantially reduce the US trade deficit.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Tariffs do not address the cause of the US trade deficit and are likely to have little impact on it. For an excellent and easy to understand explanation see FT article by Obstfeld below.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: The threat of retaliation against the imposition of higher tariffs on a country’s exports substantially lowers the probability of a trade war.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Answer obviously depends on the rationality of the players & the credibility of the threat. But if the retaliatory response is targeted in a way that it becomes credible, it should lower the probability. See evidence for EU retaliatory threats to 2002 US steel safeguards below.
-see background information here |
Question C: In the event that the threat of retaliation does not deter the imposition of tariffs, the economies of countries subject to higher tariffs on their exports would be measurably better off by responding with targeted tariffs on imports from the first mover.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Plenty of evidence that retaliation will make things worse for all economies involved (see estimates below). Definitely in short-run but also lasting neg effects. The problem of not responding is that it might invite future tariffs. Responding country faces prisoners dilemma.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: The wave of immigration to Germany after 2015 (and up to the Russian invasion of Ukraine) has been a net positive for the country's economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: If we take GDP as measure for net positive, then evidence supports the statement. Small pos. effect (see links). Effects on medium & long-term growth depend on how migrants are integrated into labor markets. 60% of 2015 arrivers in Germany were in jobs by 2019 (see links)
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: Immigration to EU countries has been a net positive for government finances, adding substantially more in tax revenues than the increased costs associated with integration of immigrants.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Evidence supports the statement. Migrants compare favorably to natives in terms of payments and contributions (see links). Their favorable age structure is an important factor.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question C: Given Europe's low and falling fertility rates (from seven million births per year in 1960 to four million today), maintaining its position as a world economic power will require increased immigration over the medium term.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Question A: Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/putting-america-first-in-international-environmental-agreements/
'In recent years, the United States has purported to join international agreements and initiatives that do not reflect our country's values or our contributions to the pursuit of economic and environmental objectives... The United States Ambassador to the United Nations shall immediately submit formal written notification of the United States' withdrawal from the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.'
US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement will deliver a measurable boost to the country's economic growth over the next four years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Disagree |
5 |
|
Question B: US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement will have a measurably negative impact on international progress on mitigation of global warming.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Although the US is the largest emitter, its withdrawal alone has limited impact on the world's progress re climate mitigation, unless it serves as an impetus for other countries to give up their efforts as well.
|
Question A: A baseline US tariff of 10% on all European imported goods would have substantially damaging economic consequences for many countries in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question B: Rather than responding to threatened tariffs with retaliatory measures, unilaterally opening EU markets to US exports would deliver better outcomes for European industry.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: From a pure economic perspective, it would likely be better not to respond. Retaliatory tariffs also have negative consequences for the country that imposes them. However, there are complicated strategic and long-run economic considerations that make the answer uncertain
|
Question C: Disruptions to global supply chains from new tariffs and trade wars will lead to measurably slower global growth over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Question A: The likely need for increased European public investment in defense should come with substantial reallocations of public budgets at the national and EU levels.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: At least in the medium to long run budgets need to be adjusted to the new realities
|
Question B: Greater use of joint EU-level procurement of military equipment and defense research/innovation would promote substantially enhanced capacity in Europe's defense industry.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Agree |
5 |
|
Question C: Increased defense spending would deliver a measurable boost to economic growth in Europe over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Possible but depends on whether the increase is funded with debt or cuts elsewhere.
|
On the basis of current climate policy commitments and potential technology and market responses, my current best estimate for global warming is that average global temperatures by 2100 will rise to no more than 2.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Obviously estimate w/huge std error that requires reliance on climate science. My understanding (see link) is that much depends on whether ctries live up to pledges & NDCs (=2.1 C) or continue w/current policies & actions (=2.7 C). Also hope that Amara's Law is at play for tech
-see background information here |
Question A: A period of high inflation is substantially more electorally damaging to incumbent governments in advanced countries than a period of high unemployment.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: It might as more people are affected by inflation than by unemployment. But the answer is unclear because, at least for the US, there is evidence that these two issues have different effects by party affiliation and hence the answer could depend on incumbent government.
-see background information here |
Question B: Voters are more likely to punish incumbents for what they perceive as poor national economic performance than they are to reward incumbents for a good economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: The Q of how much economic performance influences voting is subject to much research. Not sure there is a consensus, let alone evidence on asymmetric responses. The evidence also depends on country development and the strength of voter identification with the parties. See below.
-see background information here |
Question A: The institutions of society - such as constitutions, laws, judiciaries, and property rights - substantially shape economic decisions, policies, and outcomes.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Strongly Agree |
8 |
|
Question B: On average and over the long term, democracies deliver substantially better economic growth than other forms of government.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: On average and over the long term
|
Question C: Countries where democracy and the rule of law are weakened are likely to experience measurable damage to their economic performance.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question A: Current enforcement of competition policy in Europe is not working to promote innovation and growth.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Uncertain. There is some evidence (below) that Single Market Programme and EU competition policy have helped productivity growth and innovation. But this evidence predates the dominance of US tech giants.
-see background information here |
Question B: European Union bureaucracy and regulations are a substantial constraint on innovation in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: There is definitely evidence to support this statement. The EU needs reforms to reduce bureaucracy and improve regulations. However, the costs re innovation also have to be traded off against the potential benefits of the regulations. Looking at innovation is not enough.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question C: The conduct of the dominant US tech companies in European markets (including lobbying and acquisition of start-ups and competitors) is a substantial constraint on innovation in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: There are good arguments and evidence that large dominant players can stifle innovation and engage in killer acquisitions. But uncertain as I don't know enough about the specific conduct of US tech firms.
|
Question A: In pursuing social and environmental initiatives, the average public company generates more benefits than costs in terms of profits.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Unlikely that E&S initiatives on average increase profits as otherwise we wouldn't have so many environm. & soc. problems. Many studies suggest a positive relation for such initiatives but plagued by selection&endogeneity. Avoiding externalities should typically cost firms money.
|
Question B: In pursuing social and environmental initiatives, public companies would benefit from a measurably lower cost of capital.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: It is possible that pursuing some E&S activities (or engaging in CSR) could lower firm risks and be rewarded by markets with a lower CoC. But I doubt it is true on average for the same reason as first Q. The evidence so far is also mixed.
|
Question C: There are substantial social benefits when managers of public companies make choices that account for the impact of their decisions on customers, employees, and community members beyond the effects on shareholders.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Firm activities can have (substantial) externalities on other stakeholders and taking these externalities into account (almost by definition) creates substantial social benefits. However, doing so likely also reduces firm profits (on average), so there is a tradeoff.
|
Question A: US antitrust investigations of the dominant firms in artificial intelligence are warranted by the need to foster competition and innovation in the technologies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
5 |
|
Question B: Seeking to slow the pace of artificial intelligence use and implementation would be a more effective means of assessing potential harms from the technologies than market deployment and ex post assessment.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
4 |
Comment: One question is whether it can be slowed effectively (esp. internationally). But it will be even harder once AI firms make huge profits & have lobbying power. Also, unlikely markets and deployment will protect us against harm. So we need corp governance and some rules for AI.
|
Question A: The proposed US tariffs on Chinese EVs would lead to measurably higher employment in the US automotive industry over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
|
Question B: The proposed US tariffs on Chinese EVs would measurably slow the adoption of green technology by consumers.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
5 |
|
Question C: Unless the EU matches the proposed US tariffs on Chinese EVs, there would be measurably lower employment in Europe's automotive industry over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
|
Question A: Greater integration of national markets for financial services, energy and telecommunications would give a measurable boost to Europe’s GDP over the next ten years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: The evidence of M&A activity on economic growth is fairly mixed.
|
Question B: The potential benefits for GDP from loosening European merger rules to allow greater consolidation within the single market would outweigh the potential harm to consumers from weaker competition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Very difficult if not impossible welfare comparison. But if growth effects are weak benefits are unlikely to outweigh the harm. Also not clear that there is single market in the EU for many products and services
|
Question A:Creation of a more unified capital market in Europe - with a common pool of capital, a single rule book and a strengthened European Securities and Markets Authority, comparable to the US Securities and Exchange Commission – would lead to a substantial shift in the balance of companies listing their shares in the EU vis-a-vis the US.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Unsure that shift would be substantial. Measurable yes. Cap mkt union would help but there are other institutional or market factors. Valuations are higher in US and not clear this is solely because of securities regulation and SEC enforcement (though they are important)
-see background information here |
Question B: Creation of a more unified capital market in Europe - with a common pool of capital, a single rule book and a strengthened European Securities and Markets Authority, comparable to the US Securities and Exchange Commission – would substantially increase the availability of funding for start-ups and growing companies across the EU.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Substantial? Deep & liquid public markets are important, not only b/c they provide funding to growth firms, but also b/c they provide exit for PE and VCs that fund private & startups. Though we also see fewer IPOs in US, yet there is plenty of funding for private & growth firms
|
Question A: The European Union's AI Act was approved by the European Parliament in March 2024: https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-act/
The EU's legislation to regulate artificial intelligence is likely to put European technology firms at a substantial disadvantage to their competitors elsewhere in the world.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Constraining EU firms when competitors are unconstrained is a disadvantage. But how substantial it is depends also on what other countries do, hence uncertain. Even if EU firms are disadvantaged, restrictions can be right if activity has substantial externalities or risks.
|
Question B: By providing a clear set of rules, the EU's legislation on artificial intelligence is likely to enhance research and innovation by firms building the new technology.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Disagree |
4 |
Comment: Providing a clear set of rules removes regulatory uncertainty, which should promote development of AI systems, but only of those that fall within the rules. It also constrains certain developments & innovations, which again can be appropriate depending on externalities and risks
|
Question A: Europe’s economic growth performance over the last 25 years has been measurably better than it would have been in the absence of the single currency.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Evidence for overall economic growth in Euro adopting countries is decidedly mixed, though the effects differ across countries. However, evidence for the growth effect of EU integration is generally positive. Perhaps success of Euro should be judged on price stability?
|
Question B: With euro area member states having given up their ability to carry out independent monetary policy, it is substantially more difficult for them to respond effectively to country-specific macroeconomic disturbances.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
8 |
|
A legalized and carefully regulated market for cannabis would lead to measurably higher social welfare than a system of prohibition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: There are good economic arguments in favor of legalization & regulation. But a key question are the effects on use & health of youth and adolescents. For use, mixed evidence. For health, evidence is still developing. Hence, I am uncertain. See some sources below.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: The economic and financial sanctions against Russia are substantially limiting its ability to wage war on Ukraine.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
No Opinion |
Uncertain |
5 |
|
|
Question B: In the absence of continuing flows of Western economic aid, Ukraine's wartime economy will be substantially compromised.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
1 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question A: A constitutional rule that limits the size of budget deficits that governments can run as a share of GDP is an effective way to impose discipline on a country’s public finances.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
7 |
|
Question B: Germany’s debt brake is a substantial constraint on vital public investment in physical/digital infrastructure and the green transition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: It is substantial constraint for two reasons. For one, large other spending. The purpose of debt brake is to force politicians to make tradeoffs. Second, the brake makes no distinction between consumption and investment. It could make sense to treat (some) investment differently.
|
Question A:The fundamental cause of Argentina’s high inflation is unfunded fiscal commitments that are being financed by the central bank.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Of course many countries have unfunded fiscal commitments, so the magnitude of those commitments matters.
|
Question B: Even if Argentina could marshal the resources to make a full switch to using US dollars for domestic transactions, it would substantially increase the volatility of Argentine GDP.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
7 |
|
Question A: It is best for society if the management of publicly traded corporations only considers the impact of their decisions on customers, employees, and community members to the extent that these effects feedback to affect shareholder wealth.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
9 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: For at least two reasons. First, (negative) externalities from corp activities. Policy doesn't always force firms to internalize them. Second, some shareholders might care about a firm's impact on society (e.g. environment) even when it reduce profit. Max sh welfare not sh wealth
|
Question B: The typical chief executive officer of a publicly traded corporation is paid more than his or her marginal contribution to the firm's value.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Hard to determine. Not aware of evidence showing this convincingly. There is evidence of overpay for firms with weak governance and for pay for luck, but not clear that the average CEO is paid above marginal product.
|
Question A: By enabling women’s life choices about education, work and family, the contraceptive pill made a substantial contribution to closing gender gaps in the labor market for professionals.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question B: Gender gaps in today’s labor market arise less from differences in educational and occupational choices than from the differential career impact of parenthood and social norms around men's and women’s roles in childrearing.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Agree with the statement for developed and fairly advanced economies.
|
Question C: The gender gap in pay would be substantially reduced if firms had fewer incentives to offer disproportionate rewards to individuals who work long and/or inflexible hours.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question A: The EU's taxonomy for sustainable activities - a classification system that defines criteria for economic activities that are aligned with a net zero trajectory by 2050 and the broader environmental goals other than climate - is an effective way to steer greener investment and the energy transition by firms and financial institutions.
Details on the taxonomy are here:
https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/tools-and-standards/eu-taxonomy-sustainable-activities_en
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: If by "effective" we mean whether the taxonomy will steer investments, then the answer is clearly yes, because it is tied to several EU regulations/directives. It is less clear that it is a good way to steer investments or the energy transition.
|
Question B: Use of the EU taxonomy for sustainable activities is likely to stifle important innovations, including in green technology.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Definitely a concern. It could stifle innovation by being inflexible and driven by political compromises, rather than technological advances. It is updated only every three years (and we have not yet seen how much it changes with an update).
|
Question C: On balance, use of the taxonomy in EU directives and regulation is likely to be net beneficial to European citizens.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
8 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: It is too early and not much evidence yet. On one hand, the taxonomy limits greenwashing and guides investments in the direction of sustainability. On the other hand, much hinges on design and flexibility of the taxonomy. A price mechanism (think carbon tax) should be considered.
|
Question A: Fiscal rules on budget deficits and public debt levels are an essential part of a sound fiscal framework.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
7 |
|
Question B: Since the inception of the Stability and Growth Pact, budget deficits in Europe have been measurably lower, on average, than would have been the case without common budget rules.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Uncertain |
7 |
|
Question C: Since the inception of the Stability and Growth Pact, the path of GDP growth in Europe has been measurably more stable than would have been the case without common budget rules.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Disagree |
6 |
|
Question A: Non-bank financial intermediaries pose a substantial threat to financial stability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Uncertain as it depends on the non-bank intermediary and the specific circumstances. But non-bank intermediaries CAN pose a substantial threat to financial stability
|
Question B: Regulating the leverage and liquidity of non-bank financial intermediaries would substantially improve financial stability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Uncertain as not all non-bank intermediaries pose a threat to financial stability. It also depends on how leverage and liquidity are regulated but generally speaking these tools improve financial stability.
|
Question C: Given current regulations, non-bank financial intermediaries should not have access to central bank support.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
|
Question A: A significant factor behind today’s inflation in Europe is dominant corporations in uncompetitive markets taking advantage of their market power to raise prices in order to increase their profit margins.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
2 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: It is a possibility in some markets, but I don't think it is large enough in aggregate to be a "significant factor" in the overall inflation rate (unless one includes energy here, which is a key driver, but largely due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine)
-see background information here |
Question B: A significant factor behind today’s inflation in some sectors of the European economy is dominant corporations in uncompetitive markets taking advantage of their market power to raise prices in order to increase their profit margins.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Concentration or noncompetitive markets can be an amplifying factor in an inflationary environment. But it is unclear that it is a "significant" factor (again excluding energy sector due to special situation). It would likely be a measurable factor in some markets.
-see background information here |
Question C: A significant factor behind today’s inflation in some sectors of the European economy (both competitive and concentrated) is distortions in the aggregate economy where supply does not meet demand.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Question A: If countries could impose a ban on the use of ChatGPT and similar generative AI chatbot services that is technologically effective, they would experience a measurably negative impact on national innovation.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question B: Regardless of whether advances in AI spur productivity growth, they are likely to create deep challenges for society – in areas from labor markets to politics, and including disinformation, privacy, crime, and warfare – that will be difficult to anticipate, plan for, and contain.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: The signs are already there and people who understand these advances much better are warning us to consider these potential consequences.
-see background information here |
Question A: Use of artificial intelligence over the next ten years will lead to a substantial increase in the growth rates of real per capita income in the US and Western Europe over the subsequent two decades.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Key question is how substantial the increase will be - confidence interval is pretty large (and hence low confidence score)
|
Question B: Use of artificial intelligence over the next ten years will have a substantially bigger impact on the growth rates of real per capita income in the US and Western Europe over the subsequent two decades than the internet has had over the past two decades.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: I am reasonably certain that the answer is we don't know (hence vote uncertain). Besides, exact magnitude of the internet's impact on growth and in particular productivity growth is still being debated. It has likely increased over time, which makes comparison even more difficult
|
Question A: Preserving the financial viability of France's state pension system is better achieved by raising the effective retirement age than by raising contributions while working.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: The answer depends somewhat on the source of the problem. But longer life expectations are an important part of the problem that the system faces.
|
Question B: Preserving the financial viability of France's state pension system is better achieved by raising the effective retirement age than by reducing benefits once retired.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Again, it depends on the problem. France is currently towards the lower end of the spectrum among developed countries and life expectancy has grown.
|
Question A: Financial regulators in the US and Europe lack the tools and authority to deter runs on banks by uninsured depositors.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Without insurance, deposits are inherently unstable and runs can occur. However, runs are also connected to asset valuation and risk management. Regulators have extensive tools with respect to both and can therefore prevent many runs.
|
Question B: Not guaranteeing uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley Bank in full would have created substantial damage to the US economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Given how many other U.S. had uninsured deposits and unrealized losses for HTM securities, not guaranteeing deposits could have set off a run at many other banks, which would have been difficult to contain. But doing also set a costly precedent.
|
Question C: Fully guaranteeing uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley Bank substantially increases banks’ incentives to engage in excessive risk-taking.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: The extent to which large uninsured depositors really monitor banks is unclear. In SVB's case they did not. Perhaps they didn't because they expected that they would be bailed out. They likely would pay more attention going forward if there had been haircuts in this case.
|
Question A: The amendments to the Northern Ireland protocol agreed by the UK and the EU are unlikely to have a measurable direct impact on UK growth over the next two years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Disagree |
5 |
|
Question B: If renewed UK-EU scientific cooperation were achieved in the wake of the Windsor framework, it would be likely to have a measurable positive impact on UK growth over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Effect is likely directionally positive, but scientific progress takes time to manifest in growth.
|
Question A: Adam Smith’s metaphor of the invisible hand has been foundational to the development of modern economic theory.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
8 |
|
Question B: Adam Smith’s metaphor of the invisible hand has been commonly misinterpreted as advocacy for pure laissez-faire capitalism.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
No Opinion |
Agree |
8 |
|
|
Question A: Loosening regulations on state aid to allow targeted incentives for companies in certain sectors will substantially improve the EU’s relative attractiveness for corporate investment.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: It will have this effect on the EU's relative attractiveness (and counter US incentives) but also lead to some zero sum competition within the EU. Similar to tax competition.
|
Question B: Loosening regulations on state aid will give a substantial advantage to the economies of EU members with stronger public finances.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Not sure about "substantial" - depends on how the temporary loosening is implemented (e.g., how targeted, how long, any EU funds for poorer countries, etc.)
|
Question C: Even if looser regulations on state aid are temporary, they risk permanent damage to the EU’s longstanding competition policy regime.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Again, much depends on strict implementation (temporary, targeted, limited to those affected by US IRA, etc.). Poor implementation could have this effect but weakening EU competition regime would not be good. See links on earlier IGM polls on EU competition policy below.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: Without government intervention, take-up of electric vehicles will be substantially less than is desirable to reduce carbon emissions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Agree |
6 |
|
|
Question B: To encourage greater take-up of electric vehicles, public expenditure on infrastructure to support them (such as charging stations) is likely to be more cost-effective than providing equivalent amounts as tax credits/purchase rebates for buyers.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Did Not Answer | Uncertain |
5 |
|
|
Question A: Network externalities give Twitter an incumbent advantage that will slow substantially the migration of users who would prefer alternative platforms.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question B: As of now, there needs to be more government regulation around Twitter’s content moderation and personal data protection.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
No Opinion |
Agree |
5 |
|
|
Question A: The carbon border adjustment mechanism will ensure that the European Union’s green objectives are not undermined by the relocation of EU production in the sectors under the mechanism to non-EU countries with less ambitious climate policies (‘carbon leakage').
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Agree in principle. CBAM should help with concerns about leakage and the competitiveness of domestic firms. But “ensure” is a strong statement. The devil is in the details. Much depends on scope and implementation. Evidence for overall effect on emissions mixed.
-see background information here |
Question B: To the extent that the carbon border adjustment mechanism is effective in reducing emissions and carbon leakage, it will impose substantial costs on the economies of poorer countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: If effective, CBAM will shift some of the burden to non-abating countries, which most likely poorer countries. We know this from tariff literature. “Uncertain” because not sure about size of effect. It (or incidence) depends on the demand and supplies elasticities.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: Research on the nature and impact of bank runs has made it possible to limit the occurrence of financial crises and the economic damage they cause.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Agree |
8 |
|
Question B: Despite repeated reforms of financial regulation (and macroprudential policies in some countries), there will always be occasional financial crises.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Foolproof financial regulation is likely not feasible and/or too costly (i.e., more costly than the crises it prevents).
|
Question A: The UK’s removal of the cap on bankers' bonuses (introduced by the EU in 2014 and which limits payouts to two times annual base salary) will provide a measurable boost to the country’s economic growth.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
7 |
|
Question B: Removing the cap on bankers' bonuses will measurably enhance the global competitiveness of the UK’s financial services sector.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: More flexibility in pay structures should at the margin help competitiveness, but not clear how restrictive the cap was in the first place.
|
Question C: Removing the cap on bankers' bonuses will pose a measurable risk to financial stability in the UK.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: The link between variable banker pay and financial stability is theoretically and empirically unclear. For relevant evidence see below.
-see background information here |
Question A: A price cap imposed by the G7/EU countries on purchases of Russian oil and oil-related products (and which applies to all importers of Russian oil using Western trade infrastructure, shipping, and insurance) would be an effective measure to reduce the flow of revenues to Russia.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: In theory, it should but there are many practical questions as to whether the cap will work. For pros and cons see links below. On balance, a cap likely reduces Russia’s oils revenue by some, but it is unclear how big the effect will be.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: The oil price cap imposed by the G7/EU countries will not have a substantial effect on the world oil price (such as the Brent crude benchmark).
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: The effect on price is hard to predict as it depends on how Russia and also China and India respond to the cap.
|
Question A: The increasing share of income and wealth among the richest people in a number of advanced countries is giving significantly more political power to the wealthy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Some work in economics consistent with the relation but evidence in political science viewed more mixed. See links below.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: The increasing share of income and wealth among the richest people in a number of advanced countries is having a significantly negative effect on intergenerational social mobility.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: This is Kruger's Great Gatsby Curve. See his CAP speech for some references in support.
-see background information here |
Question C: The increasing share of income and wealth among the richest people in a number of advanced countries is a major threat to capitalism.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Major is a bit strong. It is not wealth per se, but the sense of fairness, so how the rich obtained it. Inequality can create ripple effects
-see background information here |
Question A: A windfall tax on the excess profits of large oil and gas companies – with the revenue rebated to households – would be an efficient way to provide temporary relief for the average household in European countries from rising energy costs.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: The incidence of this tax is unclear but matters. Moreover there are many issues with constitutionality and implementation of this tax.
|
Question B: Fiscal measures putting a cap on consumer energy prices would be a more appropriate immediate response to increased inflation in the euro area than raising interest rates.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Strongly Disagree |
8 |
|
Stablecoins that are not fully backed by either central bank reserves or government securities with minimal price volatility are inherently vulnerable to runs.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
8 |
High tariffs imposed by the European Union on imports of Russian natural gas would be an effective measure to reduce the flow of revenues to Russia while limiting disruption to supplies to Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Could send very important political&symbolic message. But economic effect hard to predict; depends on dm & sup elasticities and pricing mech
|
Rather than using second-round runoffs to settle elections in which no candidate wins a first-round majority, the overall preferences of the electorate would be better reflected by using a single round with ranked-choice voting, in which voters are instructed to rank all of the candidates.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Disagree |
5 |
Question A:Rising energy prices suggest that the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve will have to increase interest rates faster than they intended to before the invasion.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Uncertain |
8 |
Comment: Depends on view of how transient increases in energy prices are. Lots of volatility in energy prices.
|
Question B: Increased public spending by European countries to accommodate larger defense budgets, migration inflows and accelerated investment in alternative energy sources would be better financed mostly through taxes, rather than debt.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Defense & energy transition are long-run expansions of public spending, so taxes better to avoid distortions from irregular tax patterns
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question C: Economic damage from the shock to global commodity markets will fall disproportionately hard on low- and middle-income countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Shocks typically fall disprop. on these countries but commodity prices increases often positively affect those that have nat resources
|
Question A:The fallout from the Russian invasion of Ukraine will be stagflationary in that it will noticeably reduce global growth and raise global inflation over the next year.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: A bit early and hard to tell at this point, but not unlikely given impact on energy prices and supply chains.
|
Question B: The economic and financial sanctions already implemented will lead to a deep recession in Russia.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question C: Targeting the Russian economy through a total ban on oil and gas imports carries a high risk of recession in European economies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Possible but hard to know. It should still be considered for political and humanitarian reasons. It might be a price worth paying.
|
Question D: Weaponizing dollar finance is likely to lead to a significant shift away from the dollar as the dominant international currency.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: It could have this effect, but not sure it is "likely". It also depends on rules for use in future. Probably good to lay out some rules.
|
Question A:High volatility in the prices of crypto assets such as Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and Ethereum largely reflects movements in investor sentiment rather than news about potential sources of fundamental value (such as possible applications, or use in illicit transactions).
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Clearly speculation drives much of the vola, but also evidence that hashrate, network size or more trad pricing factors matter.
-see background information here |
Question B: Given existing regulation of the financial system, as crypto assets grow in value and become more connected to the rest of the system, the fluctuations in their valuations will pose a serious risk to financial stability in advanced economies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Agree they *could* pose a risk but currently risk is still small. Use of crypto could pose challenges to local currency monetary policy.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question C: Private unbacked crypto assets serve no important economic purpose.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Currently they are mainly a new technology, but they could eventually serve a purpose (e.g., be embedded in a digital platform ecosystem)
-see background information here |
Question A:Firms’ incentives to reduce costs by sourcing inputs and products abroad have caused many European industries to become more vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question B: Private firms have inadequate incentives to make investments to reduce the risk that disruptions in the supply of imports will cause shortages and raise domestic prices.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Resilience is bit like insurance. Underprovision in priv. mkts due to info&public goods prob. Mitigating disruptions requires collaboration.
|
Question C: Prioritisation of efficiency over resilience in global supply chains makes current disruptions likely to continue beyond 2022.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
No Opinion |
Uncertain |
5 |
|
|
Question A:Given the centrality of semiconductors to the manufacturing of many products, securing reliable supplies should be a key strategic objective of EU and national policy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
5 |
|
Question B: Europe’s small role in global semiconductor production is a direct result of insufficient private investment in high-tech innovation.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Little doubt that investment has been insufficient but less clear if this was the only or decisive factor
-see background information here |
Question C: Public support at EU and national level for investment along the value chain for semiconductors, including production, would be the most effective way to ensure security of supply.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Not sure it is the most effective or only way, but it is clear that govt support played huge role in Taiwan and South Korea.
|
Question A:Even without renewed Covid-19 restrictions, uncertainty about the health threat from the Omicron variant is likely to deliver a significant hit to economic activity from now through the first half of 2022.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Not sure it will be significant & how to separate it from slow-down in activity in Europe due to rising infections even prior to new variant
|
Question B: If world vaccine supply continues to be limited, global social welfare would rise by more if those vaccines were made widely available across Africa (with support for effective delivery) rather than accelerating booster vaccinations in rich countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
5 |
|
Question C: Imposing travel bans on countries where new Covid-19 variants are discovered will make it less likely that countries will reveal new variants to the rest of the world.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
|
Question A: Voluntary national targets are unlikely to be an effective mechanism for achieving sharp reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question B: Agreement on a significant global price floor for all carbon emissions would be an effective step towards achieving sharp reductions in emissions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: A significant floor would not only provide incentives for reductions & innovations but also some policy certainty.
|
Question C: Green innovation in the private sector would be strongly stimulated by a substantial increase in public spending on R&D for climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Likely, given substantial policy & technological uncertainty on one hand. Prudent, given the urgency of the matter on the other hand
|
Question A: The introduction of natural experiments to economic analysis of the labor market and related areas has led to a more precise understanding of cause and effect.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Agree but not only in labor and micro, but also many other applied fields like finance and accounting.
|
Question B: The ‘credibility revolution’ in empirical economics has improved our understanding of a number of public policy issues, including education, immigration and the minimum wage.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: For policy, causal inferences are critical so need credible designs. In many areas, still far from real evidence-based policy making.
-see background information here |
Question C: In pursuit of credible research designs, researchers often seek good answers instead of good questions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: While this tendency can be observed, I am uncertain about distortions from it. On net, emphasis on credible designs has moved us forward.
|
Question A: A mandate for public companies to provide climate-related disclosures (such as their greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint) would provide financially material information that enables investors to make better decisions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: GHG emissions are largely externalities & thus not obviously material to investors. But investors try to price carbon risks using disclosure
-see background information here |
Question B: A mandate for public companies to provide climate-related disclosures would induce them to reduce their climate impact significantly.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Lit. broadly supports such real effects. But at times unintended effcts from mandates. For GHG, there is evidence of GHG reductions (US&UK)
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: The current combination of US fiscal and monetary policy poses a serious risk of prolonged higher inflation.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Disagree |
6 |
|
Question B: Current EU and national fiscal policy plans are likely to leave European output below potential a year from now.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
1 |
Uncertain |
7 |
|
Question A:The introduction of even small trade frictions between neighboring countries can result in significant economic damage, particularly to smaller exporting firms.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question B: A national economic boom based on natural resources is likely to harm other sectors of the economy, particularly manufacturing firms.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question A: A global minimum corporate tax rate would limit the benefits to companies of shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions without biasing where they invest.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question B: An international tax system in which the major advanced economies set a minimum rate on corporate income is achievable.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: More a political than an economic question. Answer largely depends on how much pressure major ctrys exert on tax havens. EU is case in point
|
Question C: A global corporate tax system that is based on the location of final consumers would be more efficient than one based on the location of corporate headquarters and production facilities.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Many open questions and depends on details that are not spelled out in Q; such a system involves complex transfers across ctrys.
|
Question A: Under a fixed exchange rate and fully liberalized capital flows, a country loses domestic control of monetary policy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
8 |
Question B: For emerging and developing economies open to the world capital market, a flexible exchange rate confers little advantage over a pegged exchange rate in terms of economic stability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Disagree |
6 |
Question C: The key feature making the US a more natural optimum currency area than the euro area is higher labor mobility.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Disagree |
8 |
Comment: Clearly an important feature, but not clear it is most important one. Other markets, language, institutions & fiscal system matter too.
|
Question A: Reliable Covid-19 vaccines will reach developing countries more quickly if the rich countries pay the pharmaceutical companies at prevailing prices to manufacture and distribute the vaccines (or to license production and support licensees), rather than waiving patent protection.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Speed is key; not clear patents are main constraint. Licensing possible too (see BNTX). Paymts to pharma relative to upfront pub investment
|
Question B: The benefits to the US, Canada, Europe, Japan and other rich countries of paying for 12 billion doses of Covid vaccines at prevailing prices and providing them for free to the rest of the world exceed the costs that the rich countries would incur.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Benefits/dose far outweigh costs (see below). Global problem & fraction of net benefits accrue to rich ctrys. Besides, matter of solidarity
-see background information here |
Question A: The Bank for International Settlements defines a central bank digital currency as follows: ‘In simple terms, a central bank digital currency (CBDC) would be a digital banknote. It could be used by individuals to pay businesses, shops or each other (a 'retail CBDC'), or between financial institutions to settle trades in financial markets (a ‘wholesale CBDC').For developed countries, a central bank digital currency that is available to the public at large would offer social benefits that exceed the associated costs or risks.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: At this point we don't know. See all the CB research papers. Much hinges on design of CBDC and specific features of banking/payment system.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: Central banks that do not introduce their own digital money risk losing the ability to conduct effective monetary policy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
2 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Not if central banks retain oversight and regulate any private sector DC in the way they regulate banks.
|
Question C: The introduction of a central bank digital currency is unlikely to have major effects on the economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Some analyses support statement others say exact opposite. Could affect bank competition, depositor behavior, transmission, but by how much?
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: Removing intellectual property protections on Covid-19 vaccines would substantially improve availability of the vaccines in developing countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: It would improve availability if IP is indeed primary constraint. But there are other obstacles. Thus not sure.
|
Question B: Removing intellectual property protections on Covid-19 vaccines would have a negative impact on vaccine development efforts for future variants of SARS-CoV-2 or for the next pandemic.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Agree w/ effect in principle although a lot of money for development of vax came from public funds to begin with.
|
Question C: Without an international agreement that facilitates vaccine trade, countries’ incentives to limit exports of vaccines and/or key production inputs are likely to prolong the adverse effects of the pandemic in advanced countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question A: Allowing short selling of financial securities, such as stocks and government bonds, leads to prices that, on average, are closer to their fundamental values.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: A substantial body of research supports the notion that short selling contributes to price efficiency (rather than hurts). See e.g. below.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: Requiring investors to disclose short positions in a stock at the equivalent threshold as they are required to do for long positions would result in significantly less short selling.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Disclosing shorts is not equivalent to disclosing longs. Short sellers are often intimidated & can be squeezed but serve important role.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question C: Regulatory restrictions on short selling - such as no naked shorts, temporary bans in times of crisis - make it difficult for optimists and pessimists to have equal influence on asset prices.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Not clear how harmful existing restrictions (e.g., lending requirements) are, but evidence suggests that temp. bans are bad idea.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: EU Covid-19 vaccination efforts are significantly behind those of Israel, Serbia, the UK and the US.Offering substantially higher prices per dose would have resulted in larger capacity investments by vaccine makers and accelerated distribution in Europe significantly.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
5 |
|
Question B: In the current situation, paying for more production capacity would be better than offering higher prices for vaccines.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: Answer depends on what the bottle neck is. If it is capacity, then cap. subsidies help. If it is inputs, then higher prices likely better.
|
Question C: If the EU started paying prices above 100 euros per dose, it would on net reduce the cost of the pandemic to the EU via more lives saved and shorter lockdowns.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: It's fairly clear that "value"/dose to EU is well above current prices but don't know if raising now would help much. Should've done earlier
|
Question A: Policies that aim to reduce obesity by increasing incentives for physical activity would be more welfare-improving than policies that increase the financial costs of consuming calories.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Studies on incentives for exercise have mixed results. Health experts question focus on exercise and some suggest it is an industry tactic.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: A ban on advertising junk foods (those that are high in sugar, salt and fat) would be an effective policy to reduce child obesity.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: There is evidence to support the statement. Documentary "Fed Up" discusses many environmental & industry factors & parallels to tobacco
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question C: Setting targets for schools to reduce obesity (e.g. by diverting financial resources to improve school meals or add cookery to the curriculum) would reduce social welfare because schools in deprived areas, where obesity is higher, are already struggling to deliver the core curriculum.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Very relevant for deprived areas. Evidence programs work & are cost effective, but tradeoff with schooling is typically not considered.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: The current US federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour. States can choose whether to have a higher minimum - and many do.
A federal minimum wage of $15 per hour would lower employment for low-wage workers in many states.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Likely lowers emplymt for some locations&groups but not clear by how much. Mixed evid. Can also lower poverty on net, so might be worthwhile
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: A federal minimum wage that is pegged to state and/or local conditions such as the cost of living would be preferable to the current arrangements that give states a role in setting the policy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Fed regime that accounts for local conditions would dominate uniform wage regime and address many concerns about a hike to $15.
|
Question A: The UK economy is likely to be at least several percentage points smaller in 2030 than it would have been if the country had remained in the European Union.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Most estimates I have seen are on this order. For UK, multiple channels at play: trade, migration&human capital and FDI
|
Question B: The aggregate economy of the 27 countries still in the EU is likely to be at least several percentage points smaller in 2030 than if the UK had not left.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Total impact likely small(er). Main channel trade. But more uncertainty in predictions for EU; some ctrys could be affected more than others
|
Requiring Facebook to divest WhatsApp and Instagram is likely to make society better off.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Uncertain, not because there is no issue; many good reasons to take action. But not clear breakup best solution. Need new approach for DPs
-see background information here |
Question A: Our understanding of labor productivity has been much enhanced by accounting for monetary and promotion-based incentives within firms and related selection effects.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Question B: Large salaries for senior business executives are less a reflection of an individual’s current contribution to a firm’s overall performance than a ‘prize’ for those who put in the effort to achieve one of the top positions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: JEP below by Lazear (section on Relative Pay and Tournament Theory) w/ evidence. Other factors (incl. "luck") can play role too - see links.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: A wealth tax would be an effective way to reduce inequality.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: It is one lever to fight ineq but lots of issues w/implementing WT well. Issues w/progressive consumption tax as alternative too, so unclear
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: A wealth tax in a form discussed in the UK (where individuals could be taxed a percentage of their net worth over £750,000, excluding any personal pension savings and their main home) would be an effective way to improve public finances after the Covid-19 crisis.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
2 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Know little about UK specifics but disagree w/ notion to create new tax to restore finances post covid. Perhaps one-off tax better?
|
Question C: A public policy goal that could be accomplished with a well-enforced wealth tax could be accomplished at lower cost with modifications to existing taxes, such as income tax, capital gains tax, inheritance tax and property tax.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Equivalence w/ capital income tax under some conditions; some arguments in favor of WT (see below), but there are also inher and prop taxes.
-see background information here |
Question A: Google's dominance of the market for internet search arose mainly from a combination of economies of scale and a quality algorithm.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question B: In light of Google’s dominance, its current operating practices could have a substantial negative effect on social welfare in the long run.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Given G's dominance in market for search there clearly is potential for such harm. Don't know enough about its practices to answer.
|
Question C: The nature of the market dominance of technology giants in the digital economy warrants either the imposition of some kind of regulation or a fundamental change in antitrust policy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
|
The practical application of auction theory to the licensing of rights to use public assets like radiospectrum and other natural resources has generated substantially higher government revenues and better allocative efficiency worldwide than would have happened under previous arrangements.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
|
Strong competition from foreign producers is likely to encourage greater private sector expenditure on research and development in the home market.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Evidence in both directions, differing for Europe & US. Difference could depend on domestic comp or labor markets (e.g., trapped factors)
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: The ECB should aim to achieve an inflation rate that averages 2% over time.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Uncertain |
8 |
Comment: Not my area but evidence exists suggesting inflation targeting in flexible way works well (though not clear how big a change this would be)
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B:The ECB should take account of the environmental implications of its policy decisions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Clear that via effect on econ activity ECB policy has env implications but not obvious if mon policy is best way to address externalities
|
Question C: The objectives set for the ECB by Treaty should make maximum sustainable employment of equal importance as price stability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
2 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: While I can see arguments for Fed or BoE, it would be much harder for ECB w/ so many euro ctrys, emply better addressed with fiscal policies
|
Question A: Right now, the central focus of fiscal policy should be on temporary measures to provide protection and promote rapid economic recovery rather than trying to advance other objectives, such as reducing debt, tackling climate change or addressing inequality.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Given knock-on and hysteresis effects, this likely makes sense. Some stimulus could be used for other objectives, e.g., climate.
-see background information here |
Question B: Cutting taxes on firms (or delaying tax collection) will allow more of them to survive and be more effective than public spending for triggering a rapid economic recovery.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Firm survival, esp. of SMEs, is important but it is less clear that corp tax reductions are the only or most effective way to address crisis
-see background information here |
Question C: European recovery fund disbursements to crisis-hit countries should be primarily in the form of grants rather than loans.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Some funds should be distributed as grants but argument in favor is political rather than economic. Focus on how hard a country is hit.
|
Question D: European recovery fund disbursements to crisis-hit countries should not be made on condition of commitments to reform by recipients.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Disagree |
8 |
Comment: If idea for fund is solidarity & joint insurance, then no conditions. But EU should promote reforms&rule of law but has bad track record.
|
Question A: Given the social and regulatory pressures to keep prices down for drugs and vaccines to treat Covid-19, the financial incentives for pharmaceutical companies to invest in such products are below the value of the investment to society.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Generally speaking, I agree. For Covid-19, governments have offered support ex ante to counter this issue and incentivize investment.
|
Question B: Government commitments to pay developers and manufacturers above average costs for an effective vaccine or drug treatments for Covid-19 would accelerate production.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Largely implied by answer to earlier question, but in case of Covid & at this stage, I am not sure much can be done to accelerate further.
|
Question C: Given the positive externalities from vaccination, an effective Covid-19 vaccine should have priority in public healthcare funding even in countries where other diseases cause more death and disability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Would agree for advanced economies, not clear developing ctrys should spend on Covid vaccine, rather than other diseases.
|
Question A: Political conflict plays a key role in shaping economic decisions, policies and outcomes.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
|
Question B: Most European countries have larger social welfare systems than the United States in part because the latter is more heterogeneous by race and ethnicity.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: The first paper by Alesina et al referenced below examines exactly this question and there are several follow-ups with further support.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: Clearing the market for surgical face masks using prices is detrimental to the public good.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
|
Question B: Laws to prevent high prices for essential goods in short supply in a crisis would raise social welfare.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: There are equity or inequality issues related to price gouging but they can be (better) addressed with policy in question 3.
|
Question C: Governments should buy essential medical supplies at what would have been the market price and redistribute according to need rather than ability to pay.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
|
Question A: Economic damage from the virus and lockdowns will ultimately fall disproportionately hard on low- and middle-income countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: There is a lot of heterogeneity across ctrys, but health care syst weaker, high pop density, & less ability to work from home.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: A temporary standstill on sovereign debt payments by low- and middle-income countries to all official and private creditors to give those countries space to cover the immediate costs of the crisis would benefit advanced economies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: It could benefit advanced ctrys too, but whether it would is uncertain in my mind; does not mean advanced economies shouldn't do it to help.
|
Question C: Export restrictions on food and medical supplies, and other protectionist measures, are likely to cost lives and slow economic recovery in all countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question A: Government support to private firms in the form of debt (either directly or with the help of public guarantees) is desirable, but risks leaving them with too much leverage to invest and grow in the future.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Debt overhang is a serious concern.
|
Question B: Providing funds to viable businesses in the form of equity injections is a vital complement to debt support.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Makes sense to offer equity as well. But devil is in the detail here. In past, non-voting preferred stock prgs have been quite successful.
|
Question C: With the EU ban on state aid suspended, government capital injections should be provided via a newly created pan-European equity fund, rather than be left to national governments acting independently.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Agree that level playing field for businesses across EU is important. Fund could also kick start EU VC funding (not just old biz).
|
Question A:Even with the support policies implemented by European governments in response to the crisis, low-income workers will suffer a relatively bigger hit to their incomes than those further up the distribution.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Quite a bit of evidence has emerged for US. Effects in EU likely similar, though less extreme. Depends also on profession.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: With schools across Europe closed in the lockdown, existing gaps in access to quality education between high- and low-income households will be exacerbated.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Both groups will take a hit but my guess is hit for low-inc will be relatively larger. Many relevant factors (internet) correlated w/ inc.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question C: Combating the effects of the pandemic on inequality should be a priority for policy interventions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: For econ policy, inequality should be one priority, but not only one. Size of the pie matters too. Inequality at national & EU level matters
|
Question A: Severe lockdowns – including closing non-essential businesses and strict limitations on people’s movement – are likely to be better for the economy in the medium term than less aggressive measures.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: No med expert, but several studies suggest strict measures have econ benefits of lives saved that outweigh value of projected losses of GDP.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: While national governments have responded to the crisis with substantial economic policy measures, a joint euro area fiscal response is still highly desirable.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Comment: Coordination of response very desirable; Not clear more is needed right now, but solidarity is important & opportunity to show EU matters.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question C: Given the willingness of the European Central Bank to buy sovereign bonds, including Italian bonds, without limits, there is no need for ‘coronabonds’.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: ECB strategy might give enough room, but not sure sustainable; prefer transparent fiscal response by EU; not sure co-bonds can deliver this.
-see background information here |
Question A: Even if the mortality of COVID-19 proves to be limited (similar to the number of flu deaths in a regular season), it is likely to cause a major recession.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: The severity of the downturn likely differs by country, but in many countries the knock-on effects are already quite severe.
|
Question B: The economic effects of COVID-19 coming from reduced spending will be larger than those coming from disruptions to supply chains and illness-related workforce reductions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Obviously hard to separate supply & demand, but question is essentially asking whether there is big multiplier from shock, my answer is yes.
|
Question C: The economic policy institutions of the Eurozone are well equipped to ameliorate the potential economic damage from COVID-19.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: EU's supranational structure allows ctrys to help each other. Unclear how effective EU is. ECB has little room. Fiscal response necessary.
|
Question A: Germany's current account surplus is undesirable even from a purely German viewpoint: the country would be better off if, for example, it ran a smaller primary surplus, in turn leading to a smaller current account surplus.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Depends on sources of surplus for which no consensus. Yet agree GER should spend more on public R&D, incentives for private inv. &tax reform
-see background information here |
Question B: The Eurozone would be in better shape if fiscal policy were more expansionary, which would allow monetary policy to be slightly less so.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Again, depends on what money is spend on. Structural reform. Neg rates do not seem to work. In US, subsidies to banks seem to work better
-see background information here |
Question C: If there is a recession in the Eurozone, it will be essential to have a coordinated fiscal expansion.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
|
Question A: The European Union goal of reaching net zero emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050 will be a major drag on economic growth.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Likely a drag but hard to know how large. Goals have consequences for competitiveness & require large investments.
|
Question B: Carbon taxes are a better way to implement climate policy than cap-and-trade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Tax has some advantages (link), but no clear dominance. Cap&trade may be politically easier to implement. Either one better than status quo.
-see background information here |
Question C: A carbon border tax targeting imports from non-EU countries with less strict climate policies is likely to harm developing economies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: It hurts exports of some countries with high carbon use in production but could complement policies in EU if we lack global solution.
|
Question A: Following the UK election result, the certainty that the country is going to leave the European Union will provide a substantial short-term boost to the UK economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Uncertainty resolution is positive, but it made Brexit near certainty. So bump might not be large. Still huge uncertainty about trade deal.
|
Question B: Given that the transition period currently expires at the end of 2020, there is still a considerable risk that the UK will leave the European Union without a trade agreement.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Especially if BJ introduces bill that prevents extension beyond 2020.
|
Question C: Leaving the European Union without a trade agreement would have a large negative impact on the UK economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: BoJo aims for Canada-style FTA w/o alignment, so services not covered. Thus, even w/ such trade agreement likely negative impact from Brexit
|
Question A: Under current policies on climate change, the associated physical risks (such as those arising from total seasonal rainfall and sea level changes, and increased frequency, severity, and correlation of extreme weather events) will be at most a very small factor in monetary policy decisions over the next decade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Climate change can certainly create supply shocks that are relevant to monetary policy. Hard to know how large these shocks might be.
-see background information here |
Question B: The physical risks associated with climate change under current policies are likely to threaten financial stability over the next decade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Agree climate change can pose systemic risks. But don't know how likely. There are huge time lags in (nonlinear) physical climate responses.
|
Question A: Europeans would benefit more from an extra €1 billion of public R&D spent through existing (public) channels than from an extra €1 billion of private R&D spent through existing (private) channels, all else equal.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Key Q: Is public RD complement or substitute? Evidence weakly favors former, esp @ higher aggregation & more general invstm. Not conclusive.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: Europeans would benefit more from an extra €1 billion of public medical research spent through existing (public) channels than from an extra €1 billion of private medical research spent through existing (private) channels, all else equal.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Again, evidence tends to favor complementarity, but difficult to measure. Complementarity appears stronger for basic research.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: Randomized control trials are a valuable tool for answering some long unsettled questions in development economics research.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Clearly an important tool not only in development. Work by 3 Nobel Laureates has demonstrated this for dev. But also not the only one.
|
Question B: Randomized control trials are a valuable tool for making significant progress in poverty reduction.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Pov reduct is complicated process involving mkts, institutions & politics. RCT can help but need many tools, incl. theory, for sign. reduct.
|
Question A: Having companies run to maximize shareholder value creates significant negative externalities for workers and communities.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Co should max sh welfare not value. Even Milton F recognized these externalities, need laws & ethics as constraints & perhaps stronger ones.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: Appropriately managed corporations could create significantly greater value than they currently do for a range of stakeholders – including workers, suppliers, customers and community members – with small impacts on shareholder value.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Unlikely as implies corp leave lots money on table or managers extract huge rents; yet maximizing stakeh. welfare could address externalit.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question C:Effective mechanisms for boards of directors to ensure that CEOs act in ways that balance the interests of all stakeholders would be straightforward to introduce.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
8 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: It would clearly be difficult but this does not imply that one should not try. There are many difficult governance problems.
-see background information here |
Question A:Rising inequality is straining the health of liberal democracy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Feels that way @moment. Theories to support; evidence less clear. Also argument: greater econ. inequality -> greater political inequality
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: Enacting more redistributive expenditures and policies would be likely to limit the rise of populism in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: If link in A) is true & policies successful in limiting inequality, then agree. But evidence for link in A) is tenuous.
-see background information here |
Question C: European governments should allocate more resources to policies that would be likely to limit the rise of populism in Europe, even if it means higher public debt or lower public spending in other areas.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: While limiting extreme populism likely good, focus should be on inequality& its neg effects. Populism can be exercise of democratic rights.
|
Question A:At this point, there is little that the European Central Bank can do to increase or maintain output in the Eurozone.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: The ECB has bought countries and EU considerable time for structural reforms, but its measures also eased pressures for necessary reforms.
|
Question B: When the economy is operating below its potential, larger fiscal deficits are likely to increase demand and output.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Depends also on time horizon over which outcome is considered.
|
Question C: When the economy is operating below its potential and monetary policy is at the effective lower bound, fiscal policy should prioritize increasing output over decreasing public debt.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
7 |
|
Question A:Selecting candidates for membership of the ECB Executive Board based primarily on nationality ahead of competence is likely to have a negative effect on the quality of monetary policy in the Eurozone.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Constraining the choice set should have weakly negative effects.
|
Question B: Although the central bank can never be an entirely technocratic institution, the selection process for the ECB President and members of the Executive Board is significantly worsened by intergovernmental trade-offs involving appointments to other European institutions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Again hard to see how such trade offs should not have weakly negative effects. But not sure that it is significantly negative.
|
On bids for infrastructure projects, the average European would be better off if Europe’s governments favored European firms over Chinese firms (or firms from any other country with non-profit-related geopolitical strategies) — even if it means sometimes choosing a higher-cost bidder.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Depends on reason. Protectionism clearly bad for consumers. But if a bid is skewed due to other motives, then costs not only consideration.
|
Question A: Breaking the “doom loop” — a negative spiral that can result when banks hold sovereign bonds and governments bail out banks — would increase the stability of European economies in the event of another financial crisis.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Substantial evidence for doom loop and its effect on financial stability as well as that banks’ sovereign holdings are source of instability
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: Regulators should try to break the doom loop by assigning positive risk weights — in calculating banks’ capital requirements — to banks’ holdings of domestic and other Eurozone sovereign bonds.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Positive weights would be one way to reduce incentives to hold sovereign bonds, but not clear it is the best way to break doom loop. Limits?
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question C: Breaking the doom loop would impose substantial costs on powerful political constituencies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Uncertain |
8 |
Comment: Likely but only indirect evidence based on governments' resistance to potential solutions
-see background information here -see background information here |
Residents of big European cities would be better off, on balance, if governments did more to counter gentrification, for example by using rent and other housing subsidies, public housing investments, zoning regulations, or similar policies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Concerned about gentrification, but not much evidence on benefits of policies to counter it; have evidence policies have non-trivial costs.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: A common European deposit insurance scheme, once fully implemented, would increase the stability of European economies in the event of another financial crisis.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: In principle effect of DI in crisis is clear, but for EU DI much depends on implementation and harmonization. EU has mixed record on that.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: A common European deposit insurance scheme, once fully implemented, would increase the likelihood of another financial crisis in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Strongly Disagree |
8 |
Comment: Clear tradeoff w/ ex ante moral hazard. Evidence supports this & some suggests ex ante effect dominates but much depends on supervision.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: Overall, public spending on the arts in Europe creates benefits that exceed the deadweight loss caused by taxation to fund it.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Often public good arg & WTP thru taxes can be high, but pos external & dw loss hard to measure. Complicated distributional& pol. econ consid
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: Additional public spending on the arts in Europe would create incremental benefits that exceed the deadweight loss caused by taxation to fund it.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Less likely than A, but still unclear. Some evidence that spending is opportunistic by politicians but also used to attract human capital.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: The average European is better off if Europe’s competition authorities let firms merge into European champions in their sectors, even it weakens competition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Step in wrong direction; comp laws don't prevent mergers w/ strong econ rationale; if anything, we need stronger comp enforcemt
|
Question B: If China and other countries use policies that create giant international firms, then the average European is better off if Europe's competition authorities let firms merge into European champions in their sectors, even it weakens competition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
4 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Other legal&political ways to address unfair competition; Would we weaken EU IP laws just because other countries don't have/enforce them?
|
Question A: Letting publicly traded European firms report earnings annually rather than quarterly would lead their executives to place more weight on long-term issues in their investments and other decisions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
9 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Conceivable, but evidence is quite mixed. Recent studies for Singapore&UK say no. Some studies show more emphasis on acc numbers w/ Q report
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: A switch from quarterly to annual earnings reports would, on net, benefit shareholders of European firms.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
9 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Even w/ neg on invest, there are offsets. Q rep increases liquidity in secondary mkts&improves monitoring. Quite a few benefits from Q rep.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: To the extent that public corporations pursue social and environmental initiatives, they tend to achieve higher risk-adjusted (private) returns than otherwise similar corporations that pursue such initiatives less.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
8 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Evidence on doing well by doing good mixed. Metastudy finds small pos. association btw corp social & financial performance;tricky estimation
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: To the extent that Norway’s global government pension fund makes investments for social and environmental objectives — apart from investments that would bring the highest expected risk-adjusted returns — it improves the welfare of Norwegians.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Agree |
5 |
Comment: Depends on non-classical&non-monetary preferences of Norwegians. Possible but hard to know. Note also global fund invests outside of Norway.
|
Question A: The fiscal rules of the European Union should give more flexibility to member countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Flex good to avoid pro-cyclical tightening but issue is time inconsistency&incentives. Adopt bounds for deficits that depend on cycle in EU?
|
Question B: The Italian budget for 2019 that the European Commission rejected in October would have increased Italy’s risk of fiscal insolvency substantially.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Deficit was not much above rules, but debt is high & spreads reacted accordingly. Bigger issue may have been budget broke earlier promises.
|
Question C: If France runs a 2019 budget deficit of around 3.4% of GDP, as announced by President Macron’s government, France’s risk of fiscal insolvency will increase substantially.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Absolute level still low, but rel. increase in spreads is substantial. Main concern is that reason for larger deficit is inability to reform
|
Question A: Capping the number of ride-sharing drivers as is being discussed in New York City, Chicago and London will make the average resident in that city worse off.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Uncertain |
7 |
Comment: Consumers benefit from lower prices due to ride sharing competition, but drivers' income and congestion are offsetting considerations
|
Question B:To achieve a given level of congestion, it would be better to use taxes for driving that vary based on the level of congestion, rather than limiting the number of ride-sharing vehicles.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Tax finer instrument but should apply to all cars; w/ cap drivers stay longer on road. Cong pricing more efficient but distributional effect
|
People who migrated to Europe between 2015 and 2018 are likely — over the next two decades — to contribute more in taxes paid than they receive in benefits and public services.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Too early to tell. Labor mkt outcomes often worse for long time. Demographics are plus. Much depends on fast integration into lab mkt.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Ideas are nonrival, so increasing returns to scale is an essential feature of technological change in a market economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Non-rivalry gives rise to increasing returns to scale; most ideas are non-rival (unless protected) and central to technological change.
|
Voters overestimate the effect that current governments have on their economies’ concurrent economic performance.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: There is evidence for link between voting choice & current/past econ performance, but link is weaker than conventional wisdom may suggest.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Over the next decade, autonomous cars will raise average welfare in the EU by at least as much as smartphones have over the past decade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: A.cars reduce opp. cost & productivity, but impact could take longer. Relat magnitude unclear. Sm phone hard to assess, so many apps & uses
|
Britain’s Labour party recently proposed giving the Bank of England a target of 3% annual labor productivity growth. Consider the following statement:Central banks cannot significantly increase productivity growth over a ten year horizon, except perhaps by promoting macroeconomic stability.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Traditional CB tools don't directly affect productivity. Indirect effects via demand conceivable, but not clear how large&persistent.
|
Question A: The European Commission has proposed new rules to ensure that “digital business activities are taxed in a fair and growth-friendly way in the EU”. Consider two statements regarding this proposal:An EU-wide 3% tax on revenue from digital activities would, on balance, be a good idea.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Good idea to put the topic on agenda, but costs and benefits are quite uncertain at this point. Revenue generated is small given exemptions
|
Question B:If the EU decides to tax digital service providers, it would be better — given the difficulties of measuring and verifying digital activity — to tax them on the revenue, rather than the profits, that they generate locally.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: I agree local profits for digital are very difficult to determine, easy to shift & taxing consumption could make sense. But much uncertain.
|
The European Union often uses its antitrust powers to protect EU-based firms from international competition, rather than to promote greater competition in European markets.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Strongly Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Little hard evidence to support protectionism for mergers or fines. Could be in other areas&we lack similar EU tech firms as counterfactuals
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: Trade with China makes most Europeans better off because, among other advantages, they can buy goods that are made or assembled more cheaply in China.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
8 |
|
Question B: Some Europeans who work in the production of competing goods, such as clothing and furniture, are made worse off by trade with China.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
5 |
Agree |
7 |
|
Question C: If the EU followed the new US steel tariffs by imposing similar EU tariffs on steel from China, it would improve Europeans’ welfare.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Strongly Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Small group might benefit from tariffs, but most are hurt. Overall costs outweigh benefits considering how widely steel is used in economy.
|
Question A: Assuming it exits its third bailout program this summer without an immediate restructuring or other debt relief, Greece is unlikely to default on its sovereign debt in the coming decade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Very hard to predict. Much depends on continued structural reforms & if there is a major shock to world economy. Not much room for error.
|
Question B: Greece would be better off if it had decided to exit the euro between 2011 and 2015.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Exit restores competitiveness, but would have led to default on euro liab thereafter would have been little political will to help Greece.
-see background information here |
Question C: If Greece had defaulted on (or restructured) its private debt in 2010, while also staying within the euro, that combination would have been better for Greece than either exiting the euro or proceeding as it has actually done.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Default w/ liquidity for GR/EU banking system & money for structural reform would have been better than giving money to creditors. See oped.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: Bitcoins are more similar to gold than they are to currency.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Bitcoin is neither close to gold nor to a currency. Studies show that its asset prices so far do not behave like gold or other currencies.
-see background information here |
Question B: Bitcoins are more similar to gold than they are to Dutch tulips in the 1630s.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
6 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Investors might be speculating on bitcoins being used in some future application, but there are many competitors or alternatives.
|
The US spends roughly 17% of GDP on healthcare, according to the OECD; most European countries spend less than 12% of GDP.
Higher quality-adjusted US healthcare prices contribute relatively more to the extra US spending than does the combination of higher quantity and quality of US care (interpreting quantity and quality to reflect both greater American healthcare needs due to underlying population health and the delivery of more or better healthcare services to Americans).
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Lots evidence: It's not quantity; price is main&biggest factor; only Q is whether care intensity (the other big driver) is quality or price.
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Over the past two years, all else equal, the appeal of the US as a destination for immigrants has changed in ways that will likely decrease innovation in the US economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Will have neg impact on US human capital, which has tight link to innovation. Magnitude less clear. Impact seen in applications for MBA prgs
|
Question A:Holding other policies fixed, the average European would be better off if every European country taxed corporate profits at a rate of 20% (based as closely as possible on a common definition of profits).
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Weakly agree but case in EU not clear cut (see link). Only effective if base harmonized too. Tricky Q as ctries like IRE need big adjustment
-see background information here |
Question B: If other policies were held fixed and every European country taxed corporate profits at a common rate of 20%, then reducing that common rate substantially below 20% would make the average European better off.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Strongly Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Benefits are uncertain & concerns about effect on inequality, esp if policies are fixed & govnmts cannot compensate for inequality effects
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: All else equal, if corporations throughout Europe set quotas for a minimum number of women board members, the shareholder value of European companies would increase.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
5 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: In short run, evidence suggests negative effects likely bc supply of qualified women is not yet large enough. Not much evidence on long-run.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: Taking into account the likely effects on investments in human capital by men and women, setting quotas throughout Europe for a minimum number of women board members would generate substantial net benefits for Europeans.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Even if effects on firm value were negative, could still make sense for society to do it. But GE & long run effects are very hard to judge.
|
Question A: Subsidizing renewable energy sources is better than taxing fossil fuels, assuming the subsidy or tax would be set at levels that would reduce carbon emissions by an equivalent amount.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
5 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: CO2 tax better than either one; Subs require govmnt to pick energy source & hard to justify unless spur innovation w/ large spillovers.
|
Question B: Germany’s solar-energy subsidies to date have produced net social benefits for Germany.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
3 |
Disagree |
5 |
Comment: Wide range of estimates&benefits abroad; FiT&output sub often expensive; wind did better. Maybe offsetting benefits w/ energy independence
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question C: Solar-energy subsidies to date in Germany and other countries have produced net social benefits for the world.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
5 |
Comment: Subs spurred tech dev & adoption that w’d not have occurred as quickly; also evidence of tech spillovers but size unclear yet crucial to Q.
-see background information here |
Insights from psychology about individual behavior – examples of which include limited rationality, low self-control, or a taste for fairness – predict several important types of observed market outcomes that fully-rational economic models do not.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Tend to agree, but depends on setting & details. Often traditional models can be extended to explain as well. Point is not always to predict
|
The influx of refugees into Germany beginning in the summer of 2015 will generate net economic benefits for German citizens over the succeeding decade.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
2 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Agree for migrants,esp w/ low birth rate as DE. Less clear w/ large ref influx. Key is quick right to work&access to education. DE too rigid
-see background information here -see background information here -see background information here |
Question A: Holding labor market institutions and job training fixed, rising use of robots and artificial intelligence is likely to increase substantially the number of workers in advanced countries who are unemployed for long periods.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: History&prior evidence disagree. Some job polarization&lots of complementarity. Could AI&robots be different? Yes, but so far very uncertain
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B: Rising use of robots and artificial intelligence in advanced countries is likely to create benefits large enough that they could be used to compensate those workers who are substantially negatively affected for their lost wages.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
4 |
Agree |
6 |
Comment: Assuming firms generally make tech investments when NPV positive, gains should be large enough. But not clear that the transfers take place.
|
Question A: Consumers will be better off, on balance, if European cities treat firms that provide ride-sharing platforms (such as Uber) as substantively different from taxi firms, and thus not necessarily warranting the same regulation.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
7 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Uber is more than info society service as it sets price&driver pay, so treating as transport w/minimum quality reg makes sense.
|
Question B: Assuming that taxi and ride-sharing companies were treated as substantively similar — including requirements that they operate on an equal footing regarding safety, insurance and taxation — letting ride-sharing services compete without restrictions on prices or routes would raise consumer welfare.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
9 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Classic concerns about open entry mitigated with online platforms. Not letting them compete on equal footing likely violates EU law.
-see background information here |
Question C: Regardless of how ride-sharing services are treated, existing regulations for traditional taxi firms in many European cities harm consumers by limiting competition.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Entry regulation mostly harmful. But there clearly is a case for (minimum) quality regulation, though some quality competition can be good.
|
Question A: Revising France’s labor market policies — by reducing employment protection, decentralizing labor negotiations to the firm level, and making training programs more accessible and responsive to labor demands — would, all else equal, increase productivity in France’s economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Unclear as UE protection can also spur firm-specific invt & more lab flex brings in less prod wrkrs; FR prod already among highest in world
|
Question B: Reducing employment protection would reduce the equilibrium unemployment rate in France.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
4 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Ambig evidence & theory bc opposite effect on turnover & duration; likely composition effect (CDD to CDI), which could be good for young
|
Question A: The ECB's asset purchases over the past two years have reduced the threat of deflation in the euro area as a whole.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: QE likely helped w/ deflationary pressures but by how much is unclear. There are also negative effects that question sets aside.
|
Question B: If the economic outlook in the euro area becomes less favorable, then increasing the ECB's asset purchase program (in size or duration) would substantially increase the euro area's economic growth over the following five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
2 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Perhaps one could make a case for an extension of the program (in case of a shock) but I am skeptical about further expansion.
|
In general, absent any inside information, an equity investor can expect to do better by holding a well-diversified, low-fee, passive index fund than by holding a few stocks.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
9 |
Strongly Agree |
9 |
Comment: Lots of evidence. Few people consistently earn risk-adj. ret > index ret. And even then, much might be compensation for time & effort.
-see background information here |
Question A: Without changes in policy, a rising share of people who are over age 65 will exert a substantial downward influence on per capita real GDP in western European countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Question B: In European countries where the share of those over 65 is rising, there are net social benefits to adjusting retirement ages for state-financed (including pay-as-you-go) pension systems upwards, so that revised retirement ages better reflect longer life expectancies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: If benefits defined as pc GDP, not so clear if defined broader. Likely unpopular so indexing is option. Consider alternatives as well.
|
Question A: All else equal, there are substantial advantages to having much of Europe’s human capital and infrastructure for international financial activity clustered in a single city, as they are at present in London.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Substantial agglomeration benefits in cities (Krugman, 1991); applies esp. to financial services and skilled labor
|
Question B: All else equal, Britain’s rules on hiring, firing and working hours are significantly more conducive to financial activity than those in other large European countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
6 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Not clear that significantly so; depending on dimension of labor law, NL, IE, DE, CH can be close. And, less flex can be good for innovation
-see background information here |
Question A: Setting the EU rules aside, and assuming it would take 2.5% of Italy’s GDP to recapitalize its banks, the Italian government would improve financial stability in Europe if it injected this amount of public funds into its banks.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
7 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: Helps in short-run but not clear in long-run w/o other reforms, as issue is also profitability & bank density; can increase sovereign risks
|
Question B: If Italy were to inject public funds into its banks without imposing losses on at least some claimants, an important cost would be the effect on future incentives (economic or political) in Europe.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
8 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Bending BRRD would create bad political incentives & undermine EU rules but excluding missold retail would not have same moral hazard effect
|
Question A: Because of the Brexit vote's outcome, the UK's real per-capita income level is likely to be lower a decade from now than it would have been otherwise.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Trade barriers and uncertainty are negative. But much will depend on terms of exit and when it will be triggered.
|
Question B: Because of the Brexit vote's outcome, the rest of the EU's real per-capita income level is likely to be lower a decade from now than it would have been otherwise.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
3 |
Agree |
7 |
Comment: EU larger than UK, so impact likely smaller but same caveat as in first part. Also, EU lost force for more open and flexible markets.
|
In general, using more congestion charges in crowded transportation networks — such as higher tolls during peak travel times in cities, and peak fees for airplane takeoff and landing slots — and using the proceeds to lower other taxes would make citizens on average better off.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Comment: Congestion pricing is like pricing externalities. But welfare effects are not entirely obvious.
-see background information here |
On the whole, the shift from state to private ownership of many industrial assets in central and eastern European countries after communism has increased productivity in those countries.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Comment: During transition in those economies, we also saw productivity gains for state-owned firms but gains for privatized firms were much larger.
-see background information here |
Question A: Freer movement of goods and services across borders within Europe has made the average western European citizen better off since the 1980s.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Strongly Agree |
8 |
Comment: Especially in the long run.
|
Question B: Freer movement of goods and services across borders within Europe has made many low-skilled western European citizens worse off since the 1980s.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
7 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Benefit from lower prices but neg. employment effects; net effect depends on horizon & transfers. Bigger effect for them is technology
-see background information here |
Question A: Giving tax incentives to specific firms to locate operations in a country typically generates domestic benefits that outweigh the costs to the country providing the incentives.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Uncertain |
3 |
Uncertain |
6 |
Comment: Can be local benefits but unclear politicians offer tax incentives only when net beneficial locally. Governmental agency problems get in way
-see background information here |
Question B: Europe as a whole benefits when European cities or countries compete with each other by giving tax incentives to firms to locate operations in their jurisdictions.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Disagree |
2 |
Disagree |
7 |
Comment: Zero sum unless companies would otherwise leave EU. Inefficient but it can help when tax rates are too high due to political economy reasons
|
Question A: Freer movement of people to live and work across borders within Europe has made the average western European citizen better off since the 1980s.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
7 |
Agree |
8 |
Comment: Especially when considering that many western European countries have low birth rates and aging populations.
|
Question B: Freer movement of people to live and work across borders within Europe has made many low-skilled western European citizens worse off since the 1980s.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Agree |
6 |
Disagree |
6 |
Comment: Native wages for lowest-skilled decrease, but also depends on relative skills of migrants to low-skilled natives
-see background information here |