About
- George C. Tiao Distinguished Service Professor of Economics
- Editor Journal of Political Economy (2018—2022)
- National Academy of Sciences Panel on Reengineering the Census Bureau’s Annual Economic Surveys (2015—2018)
Voting History
Question A: The cancellation of the majority of programs run by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) will have no measurable effects on GDP growth in the recipient countries over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: Didn't know any of the numbers here, so I looked up one country off the top of my head, Liberia. Received about $150m in U.S. aid in 2023. GDP that year was $4.24B, so aid was 3.5%. Loosing that seems enough to measurably affect growth.
-see background information here |
Question B: The cancellation of the majority of USAID programs will have substantially negative effects on the most vulnerable people in the recipient countries over the next five years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: See analysis for prior question.
|
Question C: Development assistance motivated by the potential benefits for the donors in terms of prosperity and security is measurably more effective in promoting GDP growth in recipient countries than aid based on humanitarian or other moral principles.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: Too much elasticity of meaning in those words to say anything definitive.
|
Question A: The termination of the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Council and shrinking staff at the core US statistical agencies will lead to a substantial reduction in the reliability of government economic data.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: The statistical agencies do amazing work with very limited resources. The advisory committees allowed the agencies to obtain volunteer expertise in a number of different technical areas. What a loss. (I was a member of the recently disbanded Census Scientific Advisory Committee.)
|
Question B: The quality of economic policy-making will be substantially impaired by reduced funding for the core US statistical agencies.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: Everyone who has ever managed anything more than a one-car parade knows that it is harder to orchestrate anything without performance feedback, and these statistics are high-quality and often have no obvious substitutes.
|
Question C: The ability of businesses to forecast and plan will be substantially impaired by lower quality economic data.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: We know that businesses use these statistics all the time. That says a lot by revealed preference. They're not spending analytical resources on them for aesthetic reasons.
|
Question A: Matching US import tariffs to the tariffs, value-added taxes and non-tariff barriers imposed on US goods by other countries would substantially reduce the US trade deficit.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: It will reduce the total amount of trade; unclear what it does to the difference between flows in each direction
|
Question B: The threat of retaliation against the imposition of higher tariffs on a country’s exports substantially lowers the probability of a trade war.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: MAD theory requires rational actors. Not clear all actors here are rational. In fact it is clear they all are not.
|
Question C: In the event that the threat of retaliation does not deter the imposition of tariffs, the economies of countries subject to higher tariffs on their exports would be measurably better off by responding with targeted tariffs on imports from the first mover.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question A: The president has signed an executive order that pauses enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Permanently ending US enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act will substantially increase global levels of bribery and corruption.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: I don't know how one way or the other if FCPA was successful at shifting the equilibrium. Maybe it was and this will cause a big change; I just don't know the evidence.
|
Question B: Permanently ending US enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act will substantially improve US businesses' long-term profits and long-term competitiveness.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question A: The new administration has issued three executive orders related to energy and climate:
Declaring a National Energy Emergency: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/declaring-a-national-energy-emergency/
'The United States’ insufficient energy production, transportation, refining, and generation constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to our Nation’s economy, national security, and foreign policy. In light of these findings, I hereby declare a national emergency.'
Insufficient energy production, transportation, refining, and generation constitute a substantial threat to the US economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question B: Unleashing American Energy: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/unleashing-american-energy/
'The calculation of the “social cost of carbon” is marked by logical deficiencies, a poor basis in empirical science, politicization, and the absence of a foundation in legislation… rendering the United States economy internationally uncompetitive… the Administrator of the EPA shall issue guidance to address these harmful and detrimental inadequacies, including consideration of eliminating the “social cost of carbon” calculation from any Federal permitting or regulatory decision.'
Eliminating the ‘social cost of carbon’ calculation from any Federal permitting or regulatory decision would substantially improve the international competitiveness of the US economy.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
|
Question C: Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/putting-america-first-in-international-environmental-agreements/
'In recent years, the United States has purported to join international agreements and initiatives that do not reflect our country’s values or our contributions to the pursuit of economic and environmental objectives… The United States Ambassador to the United Nations shall immediately submit formal written notification of the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.'
Withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement will deliver a measurable boost to US economic growth over the next four years.
Vote | Confidence | Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
Comment: In a narrow causal sense, I expect no effect. Withdrawal might be correlated with other decisions that influence outcomes in unknown directions.
|