Question A:
Tripling existing import taxes on Chinese steel and aluminum products would lead to measurably higher employment in the US steel industry over the next five years.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question B:
Tripling the tariffs would lead to measurably higher steel and aluminum prices for American producers and measurably higher finished-good prices for American consumers.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question C:
The gains for the American economy from tripling the tariffs would measurably outweigh the losses.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question A Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
It would first depend on whether these imports are shifted to other countries. Second, if it encourages domestic production, it would depend on how automated the new production facilities would be. In sum, there would be some positive effect, but difficult to know how large.
|
||||
Mark Aguiar |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
China's share of US steel and aluminum imports is not large enough for the tariff to make a big difference.
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
The last round of Trump tariffs did not raise employment in protected industries.
-see background information here |
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Dirk Bergemann |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
The substitution of chinese steel can come from many sources, thus the impact of american steel employment is less than clear.
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Assuming the US products are somewhat substitutable for Chinese products, the increased demand for US products would cause US employment in this industry to rise.
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
Likely to just change the source of US imports.
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Edward Glaeser |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Erik Hurst |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Putting a tariff on Chinese steel and aluminum may result in the US importing less from China and more from another country. Also, the extent to which the US increases production domestically, such production is done more with machines than labor.
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
The U.S. does not import very much steel from China.
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Parag Pathak |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
The tariffs will prompt technological adjustments are activity relocations whose countermanding effect on employment is difficult to predict.
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Fiona Scott Morton |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Stefanie Stantcheva |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
James Stock |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Chad Syverson |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Lots of substitution margins around Chinese-produced steel and aluminum, of which shift to domestic employment is only one.
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Ivan Werning |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Imports of Chinese steel would fall. Imports from other countries may mitigate the rise in production in US and effects on employment may be modest. There could also be a negative effect on downstream production and employment, as with Bush steel tariffs.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question B Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Again, the medium-term price effects would depend on whether imports are shifted to other countries and if there is production domestically, how efficient these new facilities would be.
|
||||
Mark Aguiar |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Effects are likely to be small.
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Hard to see how this could fail.
|
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Dirk Bergemann |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
I am interpreting "producers" to mean industrial producers who use steel/aluminum as an input.
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
The usual microeconomics apply.
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
Insofar as source of imports simply changes, price impact will be marginal.
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Edward Glaeser |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Erik Hurst |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
We don't import that much Chinese steel and would substitute to other sources.
|
||||
Parag Pathak |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Fiona Scott Morton |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
tariffs are a form of taxes on the imported good.
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Stefanie Stantcheva |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
James Stock |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Chad Syverson |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
Size depends on available substitution margins, but hard to imagine how it would ever reduce finished-goods prices.
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Ivan Werning |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Based on past experience, the tariffs will likely raise the after tariff price to the US one for one and passed on to downstream input users and consumers, as happened with the Bush steel tariffs and more recently with Trump's tariffs on China.
-see background information here -see background information here |
Question C Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Mark Aguiar |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
This is not the sector to protect. It's a tiny number of jobs, large a moribund set of companies (certainly US steel), and a crucial input into many other domestic sectors. Not all tariffs are self-destructive, but this one is.
|
||||
Abhijit Banerjee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
I don't know exactly gains for the American economy means. How do we weigh widespread losses with gains for a small group of workers?
|
||||
Dirk Bergemann |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Markus Brunnermeier |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Depends on the relative efficiency of US production, what's done with the tariff revenues, and China's counter tariffs. I speculate a negative overall impact on the US economy. It's hard to incorporate the national-security implications for the US economy.
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Liran Einav |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Edward Glaeser |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
CO2 intensity not v different but a bit dated:
This is more favorable to US about CO2 intensity (but see source):
-see background information here -see background information here |
||||
Oliver Hart |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Hilary Hoynes |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Erik Hurst |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Steven Kaplan |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Not equity weighted for sure, but distribution of impacts less clear.
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Parag Pathak |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Larry Samuelson |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
Tariffs are an inefficient employment program.
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Richard Schmalensee |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Fiona Scott Morton |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Carl Shapiro |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Shimer |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Stefanie Stantcheva |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
James Stock |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
Tariffs have direct effects, but they are also bargaining chips. It is hard to assess how those factors add up.
|
||||
Chad Syverson |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
I believe there are agglomerative forces in manufacturing, but these sectors don't seem the place for large ones.
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Ivan Werning |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Protectionism via tariffs creates well-understood aggregate losses in efficiency. This is so even if China "unfairly" subsidizes its steel.
Political motivations aside, actual distributional impacts are modest, ill targeted, and better handled with other more direct tax tools.
-see background information here -see background information here |