Question A:
One drawback of taxing capital income at a lower rate than labor income is that it gives people incentives to relabel income that policymakers find hard to categorize as "capital" rather than labor".
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question B:
Despite relabeling concerns, taxing capital income at a permanently lower rate than labor income would result in higher average long-term prosperity, relative to an alternative that generated the same amount of tax revenue by permanently taxing capital and labor income at equal rates instead.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question C:
Although they do not always agree about the precise likely effects of different tax policies, another reason why economists often give disparate advice on tax policy is because they hold differing views about choices between raising average prosperity and redistributing income.
Responses
Responses weighted by each expert's confidence
Question A Participant Responses
Question B Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Two things are ott confused. Continuously taxing savings is hugely inefficient. Taxing income at source even if it is capital income isn't.
|
||||
Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
My fear is that the distortions from relabeling the potential gains from lower capital taxes in the second best world in which we live.
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Janet Currie |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
I prefer not to think of all capital as the same.
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
This seems right on average to me, but does it need to be true under all conditions? Of this I am less confident.
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Claudia Goldin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
lots of conflicting results in the research in this area
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
Standard theory is clear that this is good for growth but empirical work is less clear. Is std theory wrong or is evidence not credible?
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Mirrlees-type arguments for taxation of the return to capital involve a sacrifice of the total size of the pot to bring about redistribution
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
But the levels of rates matter and just getting the rate capital down might have no meaningful effects.
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Not what every study finds, but most I have seen.
-see background information here |
||||
Edward Lazear |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
this is probably true if "average prosperity" means income per capita
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Hyun Song Shin |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
Most evidence points to technical change as the main force behind long run growth. Capital accumulation plays a role only in the short run.
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
If you tax investment income what will people do? Stuff their money in the mattress?
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Toni Whited |
UMich Ross School | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Luigi Zingales |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
Question C Participant Responses
Participant | University | Vote | Confidence | Bio/Vote History |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daron Acemoglu |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alberto Alesina |
Harvard | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Joseph Altonji |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Alan Auerbach |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Autor |
MIT | Bio/Vote History | ||
Main reasons: diffs in social prefs and differ in priors about "elasticity" of responses to taxes + regs. Most agree on signs not magnitudes
|
||||
Katherine Baicker |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Marianne Bertrand |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Raj Chetty |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Judith Chevalier |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Janet Currie |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
David Cutler |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
I don't like the phrasing of 'average' in the question.
|
||||
Angus Deaton |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Darrell Duffie |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
My anecdotal experience is that economists differ widely on the relative costs of income heterogeneity (equity versus efficiency).
|
||||
Aaron Edlin |
Berkeley | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Barry Eichengreen |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Ray Fair |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Pinelopi Goldberg |
Yale | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Claudia Goldin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Austan Goolsbee |
Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Michael Greenstone |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Robert Hall |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
The key parameter is the elasticity of substitution in the social welfare function across people. We don't agree on that.
|
||||
Bengt Holmström |
MIT | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Caroline Hoxby |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Kenneth Judd |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Anil Kashyap |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
This is a powerful factor that is often overlooked: the efficiency vs equity debate is still alive, even if sometimes hidden.
|
||||
Pete Klenow |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
Positive (more agreement) vs. Normative (less agreement).
|
||||
Edward Lazear |
Stanford | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Jonathan Levin |
Stanford | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Eric Maskin |
Harvard | Bio/Vote History | ||
if "average prosperity" means average income per capita
|
||||
William Nordhaus |
Yale | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Maurice Obstfeld |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Emmanuel Saez |
Berkeley | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
José Scheinkman |
Columbia University | Did Not Answer | Bio/Vote History | |
|
||||
Hyun Song Shin |
Princeton | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Nancy Stokey |
University of Chicago | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Richard Thaler |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
duh
|
||||
Christopher Udry |
Northwestern | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Toni Whited |
UMich Ross School | Bio/Vote History | ||
|
||||
Luigi Zingales |
Chicago Booth | Bio/Vote History | ||
|